This article aims to develop a critical approach to squatter (gecekondu) studies in Turkey and investigates the various representations of the gecekondu people in these studies in different periods by placing them in their social, political and economic contexts. It details changes in the representation of the gecekondu population from the 'rural Other' in the 1950s and 1960s, to the 'disadvantaged Other' in the 1970s and early 1980s, to the 'urban poor Other(s)', the 'undeserving rich Other(s)' and the 'culturally inferior Other(s) as Sub-culture' between the mid 1980s and mid 1990s, and finally to the 'threatening/varoşlu Other' in the late 1990s. It asserts that, while the approach to the gecekondu people varies from an elitist one, to one which is sympathetic to the gecekondu people, this group, nevertheless, has been consistently the 'inferior Other' for Turkish gecekondu researchers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alpar, I. and Yener, S. (1991) Gecekondu Arastirmasi [The Gecekondu Research] . Ankara: The Directorate of Social Planning Publications.
2.
Ayata, S. (1996) Varoşlar, çatışma ve şiddet [The Varoş, conflict and violence], Görüş, pp. 18-23.
3.
Bolak, H.C. (1997) Marital power dynamics: women providers and working-class households in Istanbul, in: J. Gugler (Ed.) Cities in the Developing World, pp. 218-232. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Davis, M. (1992) City of Quartz. New York: Vintage Books.
5.
Eke, F.E. (1981) The absorbtion of low income groups in Ankara, Ekistics, 286, pp. 64-70.
6.
Ekinci, O. (1993) Illegal kent: Sultanbeyli [The illegal city: Sultanbeyli] , Cumhuriyet, 28 December, p. 16.
7.
Erder, S. (1995) Yeni kentliler ve kentin yeni yoksullar1 [The new urbanites and the new poor of the city], Toplum ve Bilim, 66, pp. 106-119.
8.
Erder, S. (1996) Istanbul'a Bir Kent Kondu: Ümraniye [A City Has Landed in Istanbul: Umraniye] . Istanbul: Iletişim.
9.
Erder, S. (1997) Kentsel Gerilim [Urban Tension]. Ankara: Ugur Mumcu Foundation Publications.
10.
Erman, T. (1997) The meaning of city living for rural migrant women and their role in migration: the case of Turkey, Women's Studies International Forum, 20, pp. 263-273.
11.
Erman, T. (1998a) The impact of migration on Turkish rural women: four emergent patterns, Gender and Society, 12, pp. 146-167.
12.
Erman, T. (1998b) Becoming 'urban' or remaining 'rural': the views of Turkish rural-to-urban migrants on the 'integration' question, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 30, pp.541-561.
13.
Etöz, Z. (1999) Gecekondudan varoşa [From the gecekondu to the varoş]Paper presented to the Sixth National Conference of the Turkish Science Foundation, Ankara, November.
14.
Etoz, Z. (2000) Varoş: bir istila, bir tehdit [Varoş: an invasion, a danger], Birikim, 132, pp. 49-53.
15.
Foucault, M. (1980) PowerlKnowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
16.
Gilbert, A. (1994) Third world cities: poverty, employment, gender roles and the environment during a time of restructuring, UrbanStudies, 31, pp. 605-633.
17.
Gökçe, B. (Ed.) (1993) Gecekondularda Ailelerarasi Geleneksel Dayanışmanin Çağdaş Organizasyonlara Dönüiişümü [The Transformation of the Interfamilial Traditional Solidarity in Squatter Settlements to Modern Organisations]. Ankara : Undersecretariat of Women and Social Services.
18.
Güneş-Ayata, A. (1990/91) Gecekondularda kimlik sorunu, dayanışma örüntüleri ve hemşehrilik [The identity problem, solidarity networks and hemşehrilik in the gecekondu], Toplum ve Bilim , 51/52, pp. 89-101.
19.
Ilkkaracan, I. and Ilkkaracan P. (1998) 1990'lar Turkiyesi'nde kadin ve göç [Women and migration in the 1990s in Turkey], in: O. Baydar (Ed.) 75. Yilda Köylerden Sehirlere [From Villages to Cities in the 75th Year of the Republic], pp. 305-322. Istanbul: Turkish Historical Foundation Publications.
20.
Karpat, K. (1976) The Gecekondu: Rural Migration and Urbanization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Kartal, K. (1982) Ankara as the focus of social change in the process of urbanization, in: K. Kartal (Ed.) Kentsel Bütünleşme [The Urban Integration], pp. 123-163. Ankara : The Turkish Society for Social Science Publications .
22.
Katz, M.B. (1993) The urban 'underclass' as a metaphor of social transformation, in M. B. Katz (Ed.) The 'Underclass' Debate, pp. 3-23. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Kiray, M. (1968) Values, social stratification and development, Journal of Social Issues, 24, pp. 87-102.
24.
Kiray, M. (1970) Squatter housing: fast depeasantisation and slow workerisation in underdeveloped countries. Paper presented at the Research Committee on Urban Sociology of the 7th World Congress of Sociology, Varna, September.
25.
Kongar, E. (1973) Altındağ'da kentle bütünleşme [Integration with the city in Altindag], Amme Idaresi Dergisi , 6, pp. 58-84.
26.
Lerner, D. (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: The Free Press.
27.
McNay, L. (1994) Foucault: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
Ogretmen, I. (1957) Ankara'da 158 Gecekondu [158 Gecekondus in Ankara] . Ankara: AUSBF Publication.
29.
Öncü, A. (1997) The myth of the 'ideal home' travels across cultural borders to Istanbul, in: A. Öncü and P. Weyland (Eds) Space, Culture and Power: New Identities in Globalizing Cities, pp. 56-72. London : Zed Books.
30.
Öncü, A. and Weyland, P. (1997) Introduction: struggles over lebensraum and social identity in globalizing cities, in: A. Öncü and P. Weyland (Eds) Space, Culture and Power: New Identities in Globalizing Cities, pp. 1-10. London : Zed Books.
31.
Perlman, J.E. (1976) The Myth of Marginality. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
Sencer, Y. (1979) Türkiye'de Kentlesme: Bir Toplumsal ve Kültürel Değişme Süreci [Urbanization in Turkey: A Social and Cultural Transformation Process]. Ankara: The Ministry of Culture Publications.
33.
Şenyapili, T. (1978) Bütünleşmemiş Kentli Nüfus Sorunu [The Problem of the Unintegrated Urban Population]Ankara : Middle East Technical University Publications .
34.
Şenyapili, T. (1982) Economic change and the gecekondu family, in: C. Kağitçibaşi (Ed.) Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey, pp. 237-248. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35.
Tatlidil, E. (1989) Kentleşme ve Gecekondu [Urbanisation and the Gecekondu]. Izmir: Ege University Publications.
36.
Tok, N. ( 1999) A critical approach to gecekondu studies in Turkey . Unpublished MA thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
37.
Tok, N. and Erman, T. (1999) Gecekondunun değişen çehresini anlamak [Understanding the changing face of the gecekondu]. Paper presented to the Sixth National Conference of the Turkish Social Science Asssociation, Ankara, November.
38.
Türkdoğan, O. (1977 ) Yoksulluk Kültürü: Gecekondulularin Toplumsal Yapisi [The Culture of Poverty: The Social Structure of the Gecekondu]. Ankara: Dede Korkut Publications.
39.
World Bank (1999) Migrant women's participation in the labor force in urban Turkey. Report prepared for theWorld Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank.
40.
Yasa, I. (1966) Ankara'da Gecekondu Aileleri [The Gecekondu Families in Ankara]. Ankara: Ministry of Health and Social Services Publications.
41.
Yasa, I. (1970) Gecekondu ailesi: geçiş halinde bir aile tipolojisi [The gecekondu family: a family typology in transition], The AUSBF Journal, 25, pp. 9-18.
42.
Yasa, I. (1973) Gecekondu ailesi mozayigi [The mosaic of the gecekondu family], Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 6, pp. 41-46.
43.
Yorukhan, T. (1968) Gecekondular ve Gecekondu Bölgelerinin Sosyo-kültürel Özellikleri [The Socio-cultural Characteristics of the Gecekondu Areas and Their Residents]Ankara: Ministry of Development and Resettlement Publications.
