The institutional structure and urban policy preferences of the Blair administration have now emerged from the British government's comprehensive spending review. In a series of recent publications, notably from the Department of Transport, Environment and the Regions (DETR) and the Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) report Bringing Britain Together, the government places a welcome emphasis on the importance of working with communities and in community economic development. Unfortunately though, these initiatives contrast with a simultaneous commitment to fiscal restraint and work-based labour market policies, which seem to mark continuity. The extent to which the urban policy agenda and institutions are open to influence from community organisations promoting social justice claims that differ from those of government is therefore unclear. This paper uses Healey's 'collaborative planning' approach to explore the potential for the engagement of one such community organisation, Local Exchange Trading Schemes (LETS), to test the extent to which the new policy institutions are open to influence 'from below'.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaronovitch, S. (1996) A typology of evaluation, in: S. Aaronovitch and T. Agath-Angelou(1997) Urban Regeneration: Evaluation as a Tool for Policy Development, pp. 16-20. Local Economy Policy Unit, South Bank University , London.
2.
Axford, N. and Pincii, S. (1994) Growth coalitions and local economic development in southern England: a case study of the Hampshire Development Association , Political Geography, 13, pp. 344-360.
3.
Bailey, N., Barker, A. and Macdonald, K. (1995) Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy. London: UCL Press.
4.
Barnes, H., North, P. and Walker, P. (1996) LETS on Low Income. London: The New Economics Foundation.
5.
Best, S. and Kellner, D. (1991) Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. London: Macmillan.
6.
Blair, A. (1998) The Third Way. London: The Fabian Society.
7.
Bowring, F. (1998) LETS: an eco-socialist initiative ?, New Left Review, 232, pp. 91-111.
8.
Boyle, D. (1999) 'Funny Money': In Search of Alernative Cash. London: Harper Collins.
9.
Burton, P. (1997) Urban Policy and the Myth of Progress, in Policy and Politics, 25, pp. 421-436.
10.
Callinicos, A. (1989) Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
Cdp (Community Development Project) (1977) Gilding the Ghetto: The State and the Poverty Experiments. London: CDP.
12.
Clavel, P. and Kraushaar, R. (1998) On being unreasonable: Progressive Planning in Sheffield and Chicago, International PlanningStudies, 3, pp. 143-162.
13.
Davoudi, S. and Healey, P. (1995) City Challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture ?, Environment and PlanningC, 13, pp. 79-95.
14.
Deas, I. and Ward, K. (1999) The song has ended but the melody lingers: RDAs and the lessons of the UDC 'experiment', Local Economy, 14, pp. 114-132.
15.
Detr (Department Of The Environment, Transport And The Regions) (1998a) Community-based Regeneration Initiatives: A Working Paper. London: DETR.
16.
Detr (Department Of The Environment, Transport And The Regions) (1998b) Regeneration Programmes: The Way Forward . London: DETR.
17.
Dfee (Department Of Education And Employment) ( 1997) Welfare to Work Employment Zones: Local Solutions to Individual Needs. London: DFEE .
18.
Dfee (Department Of Education And Employment) ( 1999) Jobs for all. Nottingham: DFEE Publications .
19.
Douglass, M. and Friedmann, J. (Eds) Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age. London: John Wiley and Sons.
20.
Dss (Department Of Social Security) (1998) New Ambitions for Our Country: A New Contract for Welfare. London: DSS.
21.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S.J. and Wan-Dersman, A. (1996) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. London: Sage.
22.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Empowering civil society: Habermas, Foucault and the question of conflict, in M. Douglass and M. Friedmann (Eds) Cities for Citizens, pp. 185-212. Chichester: John Wiley.
23.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy . Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
The Guardian (1999) Editorial: Councils that fail: private cures aren't the answer, 19 January, p. 17.
26.
Hastings, A. (1996) Unravelling the process of 'partnership' in urban regeneration policy, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 253-268.
27.
Hastings, A., McArthur, A. and McGreggor, A. (1996) Less Than Equal? Community Organisations and Regeneration Partnerships. Bristol: The Policy Press.
28.
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
29.
Healey, P. (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning, Environment and Planning A, 28, pp. 1377-1394.
30.
Hutton, W. (1998) The state we should be in, Marxism Today, November/December pp. 34-37.
31.
Lang, P. (1994) LETS work: rebuilding the local economy. Bristol: Grover Books.
32.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Leach, N. and Clifford, S. (1997) LETS think of an alternative system, Economic Development, 56, p 10.
34.
Lee, R. ( 1996) Moral Money? LETS and the social construction of local economic geographies in Southeast England, Environment and Planning A, 28, pp. 1377-1394.
35.
Letslink Uk (1998a) LETS, social exclusion and benefit dependency . Available from LETSLink UK, 2 Kent Street, Portsmouth, P01 3BS, UK (mimeograph).
36.
Letslink Uk (1998b) Proposals for a LETS and benefits disregard pilot within New Deal for Communities Pathfinders (mimeograph).
37.
Letslink Uk (1998c) Proposals for a LETS and benefits disregard pilot within Employment Zones (mimeograph) .
38.
Levitas, R. (1999) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: McMillan.
39.
Lipsky, M. (1968) Protest as political resource, American Political Science Review, 62, pp. 1144-1158.
40.
Logan, J.R. and Molotch, H.L. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41.
Macfarlane, R. (1994) Community Involvement in City Challenge. London: National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
42.
Mackintosh, M. (1992) Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, 7, pp. 210-225.
43.
Morris, W. (1884/1993) Useful work versus useless toil , in: News from Nowhere and Other Writings, pp. 287-306. London : Penguin.
44.
Mouffe, C. (1998) The radical centre: a politics without adversary , Soundings, 9 (Summer) pp. 11-23.
45.
North, P. (1996) LETS: a tool for empowerment in the inner city? , Local Economy, 11, pp. 284-293.
46.
North, P. (1997) Local Exchange Trading Schemes: a social movement approach. School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol .
47.
North, P. (1998b) LETS, 'hours' and the Swiss 'business ring': local currencies and business development programmes, Local Economy , 13, pp. 114-132.
48.
North, P. (1999a) Explorations in heterotopia: LETS and the micropolitics of money and livelihood, Environment and Planning D, 17, pp. 69-86.
49.
North, P. (1999b) LETS get down to business!: Problems and possibilities of involving the small business sector in CED using local currencies, in: G. Haughton (Ed.) Community Economic Development. London: Macmillan (forthcoming).
50.
North, P. (1999c) Transforming the mainstream or building lifeboats? Contested strategies for social change through LETS. Paper presented at the Institute of British Geographers Conference, University of Leicester (available from the author).
51.
Oatley, N. (1998) Managing decline: institutional fixes and urban policy in England (or new Labour: new pragmatism). Paper presented at the Cities and the Millennium Conference, University of East London, December.
52.
Pacione, M. (1997) Local exchange trading systems as a response to the globalisation of capitalism, UrbanStudies, 34, pp. 1179-1199.
53.
Pharoah, C., Romney-Alexander, D. , Kemp, K. and Smerdon, M. (1998) Achieving the double bottom line: a study of the voluntary and community sector in regeneration partnerships . West Malling, Kent: Charities Aid Foundation.
54.
Scott, J. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Newhaven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
Seu (Social Exclusion Unit) (1998) Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. London: SEU.
56.
Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilisation and movement participation, American Sociological Review, 51, pp. 464-481.
57.
Taylor, M. (1995) Unleashing the Potential: Bringing Residents to the Centre of Regeneration. York: Joseph Rountree Foundation.
58.
Thorne, L. (1996) Local exchange trading systems in the UK: a case of re-embedding?Environment and Planning A, 28, pp. 1361-1376.
59.
Toynbee, P. (1999) The new credit deal for the poor is turning into an expensive disaster, The Guardian, 8 February, p. 18.
60.
Urban FoRum (1998) Which agenda drives New Deal?, Urban Forum News, 9 (November/ December), pp. 1, 4.
61.
Ward, K. (1997) Coalitions in urban regeneration: a regime approach , Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 1493-1506.
62.
Weston, D. (1992) De-linking green pounds from the big system, NewEconomics, 22, pp. 10-11.
63.
Wilks-Heeg, S. and Townley, B. (1999) Democratic evaluation, Local Economy , 14(1), pp. 27-42.
64.
Williams, C.C. (1995) Trading favours in Calderdale, Town and Country Planning, August, pp. 214-215.
65.
Williams, C.C. (1996a) Local exchange trading systems: a new source of work and employment ?, Environment and Planning A, 28, pp. 1395-1415.
66.
Williams, C.C. (1996b) Informal sector responses to unemployment: an evaluation of the potential of LETS, Work, Employment and Society, 10, pp. 341-360.
