Sutherland (1961) proposed that the detection of motion might depend upon the ratios of firings in cells sensitive to movement in opposite directions. Sekuler and his collaborators have argued that the notion of a ratio mechanism at threshold is wrong. The findings and arguments upon which this conclusion was based are challenged, an explicit model is described which provides an account of data previously held to be inconsistent with a ratio model, and an experiment is reported which provides unequivocal support for the ratio model and whose findings are inconsistent with the predictions from Sekuler's “independence” model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarlowH. B.HillR. M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature (London)200, 1345–7.
2.
BlakemoreC.CarpenterR. H. S.GeorgesonM. A. (1970). Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature (London)228, 32–9.
3.
BlakemoreC.MunceyJ. P. J.RidleyR. M. (1971). Perceptual fading of a stabilized cortical image. Nature (London)233, 204–5.
4.
CampbellF. W.GreenD. G. (1965). Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. Journal of Physiology181, 576–93.
5.
LevinsonE.SekulerR. (1975a). Inhibition and disinhibition of direction-specific mechanisms in human vision. Nature (London)254, 692–3.
6.
LevinsonE.SekulerR. (1975b). The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement. Journal of Physiology250, 347–66.
7.
LovegroveW. (1976). Inhibition in simultaneous and successive contour interaction in human vision. Vision Research16, 1519–21.
8.
MovshonJ. A. (1975). The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. Journal of Physiology249, 445–68.
9.
PantleA.SekulerR. (1969). Contrast response of human visual mechanisms sensitive to orientation and direction of motion. Vision Research9, 397–406.
10.
PettigrewJ. D.NikaraT.BishopP. O. (1968). Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research6, 373–90.
11.
SekulerR. (1975). Visual motion perception. The Handbook of PerceptionCarteretteE.FriedmanM.New York: Academic Press5, 387–430.
12.
SekulerR. W.GanzL. (1963). After-effect of seen motion with a stabilised retinal image. Science139, 419–20.
13.
SekulerR.LehrD.StoneW.WolfM. (1971). Human visual motion sensitivity: evidence against a ratio theory of sensory coding. Perception and Psychophysics9, 483–4.
14.
SekulerR.LevinsonE. (1974). Mechanisms of motion perception. Psychologia17, 38–49.
15.
SutherlandN. S. (1961). Figural after-effects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology13, 222–8.
16.
TolhurstD. J. (1973). Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus. Journal of Physiology231, 385–402.
17.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
WurtzR. H. (1969). Visual receptive fields of striate cortex neurons in awake monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology32, 722–42.
