An experiment was conducted in which subjects matched upper and lower case versions of well-known abbreviations, such as BBC and etc, and meaningless controls. “Same” RT showed a familiarity effect for upper case versions of abbreviations such as BBC and GPO, but not for the lower case versions bbc and gpo. The converse did not occur for abbreviations such as etc, which were thought to occur most frequently in lower case. The “different” RT was inhibited by familiarity, with pairs such as IBM GPO being classified less rapidly than their lower case versions or controls. These effects occurred for subjects instructed to report “No” for “same” displays and “Yes” for “different” displays as well as for subjects given a conventional decision-report assignment. Some implications of these results for an account of the manner in which familiarity affects graphemic comparison processes are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallF.WoodC.SmithE. E. (1974). When are semantic targets detected faster than visual or acoustic ones?Perception and Psychophysics17, 1–8.
2.
BamberD. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics6, 169–74.
3.
BaronJ. (1975). Successive stages in word recognition. In RabbittP. M. A.DornicS. (Ed.), Attention and PerformanceNew York: Academic Press5, 563–74.
4.
BaronJ.ThurstonI. (1973). An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology4, 207–28.
5.
BarronR. W.PittengerJ. B. (1974). The effect of orthographic structure and lexical meaning on “same-different” judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology26, 566–81.
6.
BesnerD.JacksonA. (1975). Same-different judgments with words and nonwords: a word superiority/inferiority effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society6, 578–80.
7.
BindraD.WilliamsJ. A.WiseJ. S. (1965). Judgements of sameness and difference: experiments on decision time. Science150, 1625–8.
8.
BraceyG. W. (1969). Two operations in character recognition: a partial replication. Perception and Psychophysics6, 357–60.
9.
BriggsG. E.JohnsenA. M. (1972). On the nature of central processing in choice reactions. Memory and Cognition1, 91–100.
10.
BriggsG. E.SwansonJ. M. (1970). Encoding, decoding, and central functions in human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology86, 296–308.
11.
ChambersS. M.ForsterK. I. (1975). Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task. Memory and Cognition3, 549–59.
12.
ClarkH. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review76, 387–404.
13.
ClarkH. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 335–59.
14.
CohenG. (1968). A comparison of semantic, acoustic and visual criteria for matching of word pairs. Perception and Psychophysics4, 203–4.
15.
CohenG. (1970). Search times for combinations of visual, phonemic and semantic targets in reading prose. Perception and Psychophysics8, 370–2.
16.
EgethH.BleckerD. (1971). Differential effects of familiarity on judgements of sameness and difference. Perception and Psychophysics9, 321–6.
17.
EichelmanW. H. (1970). Familiarity effects in the simultaneous matching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology86, 275–82.
18.
EstesW. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General104, 122–45.
19.
GreenD. W.ShalliceT. (1976). Direct visual access in reading for meaning. Memory and Cognition4, 753–8.
20.
HamiltonH. W.DeeseJ. (1971). Does linguistic marking have a psychological correlate?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 707–14.
21.
HendersonL. (1974). A word superiority effect without orthographic assistance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology26, 301–11.
22.
HendersonL.ChardJ. (1976). On the nature of the facilitation of visual comparisons by lexical membership. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society7, 432–4.
23.
HendersonL.HendersonS. E. (1975). Visual comparison of words and random letter strings: effects of number and position of letters different. Memory and Cognition3, 97–101.
24.
HershensonM. (1972). Verbal report and visual matching latency as a function of the pronounceability of letter arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology96, 104–9.
25.
HuttenlocherJ.HigginsE. T. (1971). Adjectives, comparatives, and syllogisms. Psychological Review78, 487–504.
26.
JohnsenA. M.BriggsG. E. (1973). On the locus of display load effects in choice reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology99, 266–71.
27.
KleimanG. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior14, 323–39.
28.
KolersP. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In LevinH.WilliamsJ. P. (Eds), Basic Studies on ReadingNew York: Basic Books90–118.
29.
MarshallJ. C.NewcombeF.HolmesJ. M. (1975). Lexical memory: a linguistic approach. In KennedyR. A.WilkesA. L. (Eds), Studies in Long Term MemoryLondon: Wiley315–22.
30.
PattersonK. E.MarcelA. J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology29, 307–18.
31.
PollatsekA.WellA. D.SchindlerR. M. (1975). Familiarity affects visual processing of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1, 328–38.
32.
PosnerM.MitchellR. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review74, 392–409.
33.
RaynerK.PosnanskyC. J. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General107, 64–80.
34.
ReicherG. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology81, 275–80.
35.
SanfordA. J.SeymourP. H. K. (1974). The influence of response compatibility on a semantic classification task. Acta Psychologica38, 405–12.
36.
ScarboroughD. L.CorteseC.ScarboroughH. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 1–17.
37.
SchaefferB.WallaceR. (1970). The comparison of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology86, 144–52.
38.
SeymourP. H. K. (1970). Conceptual uncertainty and the latency of judgements of the congruence of word-shape pairs. Acta Psychologica34, 451–61.
39.
SeymourP. H. K. (1971). Perceptual and judgemental bias in classification of word-shape displays. Acta Psychologica35, 461–77.
40.
SeymourP. H. K. (1973). Judgements of verticality and response availability. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society1, 196–8.
41.
SeymourP. H. K. (1974). Asymmetries in judgments of verticality. Journal of Experimental Psychology102, 447–55.
42.
SeymourP. H. K. (1975). Semantic equivalence of verbal and pictorial displays. In KennedyR. A.WilkesA. L. (Eds), Studies in Long Term MemoryLondon: Wiley253–87.
43.
SeymourP. H. K. (1977). Conceptual encoding and locus of the Stroop effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology29, 245–65.
44.
ShalliceT.WarringtonE. K. (1975). Word recognition in a phonemic dyslexic patient. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology27, 187–99.
45.
ShobenE. J. (1976). The verification of semantic relations in a same-different paradigm: an asymmetry in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior15, 365–79.
SternbergS. (1967). Two operations in character recognition: some evidence from reaction time measurements. Perception and Psychophysics2, 45–53.
48.
SternbergS. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. In KosterW. G. (Eds), Attention and PerformanceAmsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company2, 276–315.
49.
SternbergS. (1975). Memory scanning: new findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology27, 1–32.
50.
TaylorD. A. (1976). Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2, 417–28.
51.
WellA. D.PollatsekA.SchindlerR. M. (1975). Facilitation of both “same” and “different” judgments of letter strings by familiarity of letter sequence. Perception and Psychophysics17, 511–20.
