In most current accounts of character classification, emphasis is laid on the role of the positive set. Reanalysis of a previous experiment (Marcel, 1970) showed that in the constant set procedure, as well as the varied set procedure, when consecutive sets of digits are used, latency to negative probes depends on remoteness from the positive set boundary, except when the positive set consists of only one item. Two further experiments showed that in both the constant-and varied-set procedures, latency to individual negative probes decreased with their frequency, except with positive sets of one item. These data indicate that negatives are not usually classified as such merely by default. Some alternative models to Sternberg's are discussed. It is proposed that when he is able to (always with one-item positive sets) the subject will perform a physical match. Otherwise the probe will access its location in long-term memory, associated with which is appropriate response information. The ease of recovery of that information is emphasized as responsible for variation in latencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaddeleyA. D.EcobJ. R. (1973). Reaction time and short-term memory: implications of repetition effects for the high-speed exhaustive scan hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology25, 229–40.
2.
BanksW. P.FarielloG. R. (1974). Memory load and latency in recognition of pictures. Memory and Cognition2, 144–8.
3.
BertelsonP. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction time to new versus repeated signals in a serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology65, 478–84.
4.
BriggsG. E. (1974). On the predictor variable for choice reaction time. Memory and Cognition2, 575–80.
5.
BrownleeK. A. (1965). Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and EngineeringNew York: Wiley.
6.
BurrowsD. (1972). Modality effects in retrieval of information from short-term memory. Perception and Psychophysics11, 365–72.
7.
BurrowsD.OkadaR. (1971). Serial position effects in high-speed memory search. Perception and Psychophysics10, 305–8.
8.
CorballisM. C. (1975). Access to memory: an analysis of recognition times. Attention and Performance V.RabbittP. M. A.DornicS.London: Academic Press.
9.
CorballisM. C.KirbyJ.MillerA. (1972). Access to elements of a memorized list. Journal of Experimental Psychology94, 185–90.
10.
CorballisM. C.MillerA. (1973). Scanning and decision processes in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology98, 379–86.
11.
CorballisM. C.RoldanC. E.ZbrodoffJ. (1974). Response set effects in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition2, 501–8.
12.
EgethH.MarcusN.BevanW. (1972). Target-set and response-set interaction: Implications for models of human information processing. Science176, 1447–8.
13.
EpsteinW.RockI. (1960). Perceptual set as an artifact of recency. American Journal of Psychology73, 214–28.
14.
FalmagneJ.-C.TheiosJ. (1969). On attention and memory in reaction time experiments. Attention and Performance IIKosterW. G.Amsterdam: North Holland Press316–23.
15.
ForrinB.CunninghamK. (1973). Recognition time and serial position of probed item in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology99, 272–9.
16.
ForrinB.KumlerM. L.MorinR. E. (1966). The effects of response code and signal probability in a numeral-naming task. Canadian Journal of Psychology20, 115–24.
17.
ForrinB.MorinR. E. (1966). Effect of contextual associations upon selective reaction time in a numeral-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology71, 40–6.
18.
HawkinsH. L.HoskingK. (1969). Stimulus probability as a determinant of discrete choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology82, 435–40.
19.
HitchG. J.Proactive interference in short-term forgetting. In preparation.
20.
KirsnerK.CraikF. I. M. (1971). Naming and decision processes in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology88, 149–57.
21.
KornblumS. (1969). Sequential determinants of information processing in serial discrete reaction time. Psychological Review76, 113–31.
22.
KruegerL. E. (1970). Effect of stimulus probability on two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology84, 377–9.
23.
KristoffersonM. W. (1972). When item recognition and visual search functions are similar. Perception and Psychophysics12, 379–84.
24.
LivelyB. L.SanfordB. J. (1972). The use of category information in a memory-search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology93, 379–85.
25.
MarcelA. J. (1969). Sequential and parallel processing and the nature of the decisions in pattern recognition and classification Paper delivered to the Experimental Psychology Society, London, January.
26.
MarcelA. J. (1970). Some constraints on sequential and parallel processing, and the limits of attention. Attention and Performance IIISandersA. F.Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.
27.
MarcelA. J.ForrinB. (1974). Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology103, 450–60.
MowbrayG. H.RhoadesM. U. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology11, 16–23.
30.
NausM. J. (1974). Memory search of categorized lists: a consideration of alternative self-terminating search strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology102, 992–1000.
31.
PosnerM. I. (1969). Abstraction and the process of recognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation IIIBowerG. H.SpenceJ. T.New York: Academic Press44–96.
32.
PosnerM. I.BoiesS. J.EichelmanW. H.TaylorR. L. (1969). Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology79, 1–16.
33.
PosnerM. I.TaylorR. L. (1969). Subtractive method applied to separation of visual and name components of multiletter arrays. Acta Psychologica30, 104–14.
34.
RossJ. (1970). Extended practice with a single-character classification task. Perception and Psychophysics8, 276–8.
35.
ShiffrinR. M.SchneiderW. (1974). An expectancy model for memory search. Memory and Cognition2, 616–28.
36.
SimpsonP. J. (1970). The organization of retrieval in the recognition of letters and digits Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Sussex.
37.
SimpsonP. J. (1972). High-speed memory scanning: stability and generality. Journal of Experimental Psychology96, 239–46.
SternbergS. (1966). High speed scanning in human memory. Science153, 652–4.
40.
SternbergS. (1967). Two operations in character recognition: some evidence from reaction time measurements. Perception and Psychophysics2, 45–53.
41.
SternbergS. (1970). Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. In AntrobusJ. S. (Ed.), Cognition and AffectCanada: Little, Brown & Co.
42.
SternbergS. (1975). Memory-scanning: new findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology27, 1–32.
43.
TheiosJ. (1972). The locus of cognition Paper presented at meeting of The Psychonomic Society, St Louis, Missouri, 4 November.
44.
TheiosJ. (1973). Reaction time measurements in the study of memory processes: theory and data. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation VII.New York: Academic Press43–85.
45.
TheiosJ.SmithP. G.HavilandS. E.TraupmannJ.MoyM. C. (1973). Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process. Journal of Experimental Psychology97, 323–36.
46.
WingfieldA.BrancaA. A. (1971). Strategy in high-speed memory search. Journal of Experimental Psychology83, 63–67.
