Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An examination of the implications of the theory of geometric illusions proposed by Gregory (1963) leads to the prediction that the illusion error should be determined by the retinal image projected by the figure rather than by its perceived characteristics where these differ. This prediction is tested in two experiments, using a version of the Zöllner illusion. In the first experiment, distance is used to manipulate the retinal image characteristics and, in the second, slant. In both cases, error is found to follow changes in the retinal image rather than being held relatively constant by the perceived size and shape. It is suggested that the effect of slant and distance on illusions, as reported by others, can be attributed to the change in retinal image characteristics involved in such operations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

L. B.

Houssiadas

(1965). The perception of illusions as a constancy phenomenon. British Journal of Psychology 56, 135–42.

Carlson

J. A.

(1966). Effect of instructions and perspective drawing ability on perceptual constancies and geometric illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72, 874–9.

Fisher

G. H.

(1968). An experimental and theoretical appraisal of the inappropriate size-depth theories of illusions. British Journal of Psychology 59, 373–84.

Gregory

R. L.

(1962). Visual perception from the engineering point of view—stability and distortions of visual space Unpublished paper prepared for Internat. Congr. on Human Factors in Electronics Long Beach, California.

Gregory

R. L.

(1963). Distortions of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature, London 199, 678–80.

Gregory

R. L.

(1968). Perceptual illusions and brain models. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 171, 279–96.

Hamilton

(1966). Susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer illusion and its relationship to differences in size constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, 63–72.

Horrell

R. I.

(1968). The geometric illusions as inappropriate constancy scaling: an examination of a theory Thesis submitted for Ph.D. degree at the University of Sheffield.

Houssiadas

Brown

L. B.

(1963). The effect of viewing slant and distance on some visual illusions. Australian Journal of Psychology 15, 108–12.

10.

Marshall

A. J.

Di Lollo

(1963). Hering illusion with impoverishment of stimulus in scotopic and photopic vision. American Journal of Psychology 76, 644–52.

11.

Marshall

A. J.

Di Lollo

(1966). Distortion of parallel lines in geometric fields as a function of size of display. Psychonomic Science. 4, 405–6.

12.

Tausch

(1954). Optische Täuschungen als artifizielle Effekte der Gestaltungsprozesse von Grossen- und Formenkonstanz in der naturlichen Raumwahrnehmung. Psychologische Forschung 24, 299–348.

13.

Wallace

G. K.

(1966). The effect of background on the Zöllner illusion. Acta psychologica 25, 373–80.

Retinal Image or Perceived Features as Determinants of Error in Geometric Illusions?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References