Owing to the different characteristics of each of the multiple polymers, obtaining a homogenous metal injection moulding (MIM) feedstock blend is challenging. Therefore, studying interactions between the polymeric components is vital for achieving suitable MIM feedstocks. We report on the effects of different compatibilisers – EGMA and E40 – on the interactions in polyoxymethylene (POM) and polypropylene (PP) blends. We measured contact angles and performed Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy analyses to identify the suitable compatibiliser that yields a feedstock with excellent properties. It was found that the binder system based on EGMA-3 demonstrates the lowest contact angle and best miscibility for the POM/PP blends compared to E40. This enhanced interaction lies in the chemistry of EGMA, having an active site that reduces the interfacial tension between the components of the POM/PP blend. Subsequently, this creates a positive interaction between the polymers and metal powders, ensuring good adhesion within the feedstock.
IsmailMH, MuhamadN, JumahatA, . Study on stability of a novel binder system based on palm stearin in metal injection moulding application. Sci Res J. 2007;4(2):1–12.
2.
MinLY, QuanLX, HuaLF, . Effects of surfactant on properties of MIM feedstock. T Nonferr Metal Soc China. 2007;17(1):1–8.
3.
HayatMD, WenG, LiT, . Compatibility improvement of Ti-MIM feedstock using liquid surfactant. J Mater Process Technol. 2015;224:33–39.
4.
GermanRM.Powder metallurgy and particulate materials processing: the processes, materials, products, properties and applications. Sci Sinter. 2005;38(1):95–95.
5.
EnnetiRK, OnbattuvelliVP, GulsoyO, Powder-binder formulation and compound manufacture in metal injection molding (MIM). In Handbook of metal injection molding. 2019;4:57–88.
6.
SubukiI, JaiJ, IsmailMH, . Interaction between binder and powder in injection moulding of 316L stainless steel. In: R Ibrahim, MH Saleh, K Norsal, MZA Malek, MA Sulaiman, MA Baharom, editors. Advanced materials research. Malaysia: Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2014. Vol. 879, p. 7–11.
7.
HausnerovaB, BleyanD, KasparkovaV, . Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools. Ceram Int. 2016;42(1):460–465.
8.
Dehghan-ManshadiA, BerminghamMJ, DarguschMS, . Metal injection moulding of titanium and titanium alloys: challenges and recent development. Powder Technol. 2017;319:289–301.
CaoP, HayatMD.Feedstock technology for reactive metal injection molding: process, design, and application. Cambridge (US): Elsevier; 2020.
11.
PattiA, LecocqH, SergheiA, . The universal usefulness of stearic acid as surface modifier: applications to the polymer formulations and composite processing. J Ind Eng Chem. 2021;96:1–33.
12.
ChiouYH, LiuSJ, LinST.Superplastic behaviour of a zirconia powder-binder blend. Ceram Int. 1996;22(3):211–217.
13.
WongpanitP, KhanthsriS, PuengboonsriS, . Effects of acrylic acid-grafted HDPE in HDPE-based binder on properties after injection and debinding in metal injection molding. Mater Chem Phys. 2014;147: 238–246.
14.
Ghasemi-MobarakehL, CanoS, MomeniV, . Effect of increased powder–binder adhesion by backbone grafting on the properties of feedstocks for ceramic injection molding. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(17):3653.
15.
HayatMD, JadhavPP, ZhangH, . Improving titanium injection moulding feedstock based on PEG/PPC based binder system. Powder Technol. 2018;330: 304–309.
16.
YeS, MoW, LvY, . The technological design of geometrically complex Ti-6Al-4 V parts by metal injection molding. Appl Sci. 2019;997:1339–1349.
17.
JiangX, LiD, LuR, . Study of hyperbranched polymer on POM-based binder in metal injection molding. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(12);125377–125392.
18.
BleyanD, HausnerovaB, SvobodaP.The development of powder injection moulding binders: a quantification of individual components’ interactions. Powder Technol. 2015;286: 84–89.
19.
HuangJ, ChengH, WuJ, . Blends of poly (propylene) and polyacetal compatibilized by ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;89(6):1471–1477.
20.
WacharawichanantS, SiripattanasakT.Mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene/polyoxymethylene blends. Adv Chem Eng Sci. 2013;3(3): 202–205.
21.
LinXD, CheungWL.Effect of single screw extrusion through a round die on the morphology of POM/PP blends. J Mater Process Technol. 1997;63(1–3):476–480.
22.
OwensDK, WendtRC.Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969;13(8): 1741–1747.
23.
RabelW.Wetting theory and its application to the study and use of the surface properties of polymers. Farbe und Lack. 1971;77:997–1006.
24.
KaelbleDH.Dispersion-Polar surface tension properties of organic solids. J Adhes. 1970;2(2):66–81.
25.
SanfordR, SaTCKF, BanerjeeS. Using a helium pycnometer as a quality tool in powder metal injection molding; 2009.
26.
TadmorZ, GogosCG.Principles of polymer processing. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
27.
WeirFE.Moldability of plastics based on melt rheology. Part 1—theoretical development. Polym Eng Sci. 1963;3(1):32–36.
28.
ParkSJ, WuY, HeaneyDF, . Rheological and thermal debinding behaviors in titanium powder injection molding. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2009;40:215–222.
29.
LinST, GermanRM.Interaction between binder and powder in injection moulding of alumina. J Mater Sci. 1994;29:5207–5212.
WuH, HouA, QuJP.Phase morphology and performance of supertough PLA/EMA-GMA/ZrP nanocomposites prepared through reactive melt-blending. ACS Omega. 2019;4(21):19046–19053.
32.
RydzJ, Wolna-StypkaK, AdamusG, . Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. part 1 - degradation studies of polylactide blends with atactic poly[(R,S)-3-hydroxybutyrate] in paraffin. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2015;29(2): 247–259.
33.
GutmannJS, Müller-BuschbaumP, SchubertDW, . Influence of the blend compatibility on the morphology of thin polymer blend films. J Macromol Sci Phys. 1999;38(5–6):563–576.
34.
HayatMD, ZhangH, KarumbaiahKM, . A novel PEG/PMMA based binder composition for void-free metal injection moulding of Ti components. Powder Technol. 2021;382:431–440:
35.
ShafrinEG, ZismanWA.Constitutive relations in the wetting of low energy surfaces and the theory of the retraction method of preparing monolayers. J Phys Chem. 1960;64(5): 519–524.
36.
HausnerovaB.Binder systems for powder injection molding: a review. Adv Mater Proc. 2021;2(12):761–768.
37.
AniSM, MuchtarA, MuhamadN, . Effects of injection temperature and pressure on green part density for ceramic injection molding. Adv Mat Res. 2013;622:429–432.
38.
LiY, QuX, HuangB, . Rheological properties of metal injection molding binder and feedstock. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China. 1997;7(3):1–5.
39.
BilovolVV, KowalskiL, DuszczykJ, . The effect of constitutive description of PIM feedstock viscosity in numerical analysis of the powder injection moulding process. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;178(1–3):194–199.
40.
ZhangC, PanY, SunJ, . A net-shape forming process of Ti–6Al–4 V sphere joints. Powder Metall. 2021;64(5):404–411.
