Effect of powder particle shape and size distributions on the properties of low-viscosity iron-based feedstocks used in low-pressure powder injection moulding
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Effect of powder particle shape and size distributions on the properties of low-viscosity iron-based feedstocks used in low-pressure powder injection moulding
Low-pressure powder injection moulding (LPIM) is a cost-effective manufacturing technology used to fabricate complex-shaped parts with high mechanical properties at low- or high-volume production. This research work presents an experimental approach to investigate the debound/sintered properties of iron components produced by the LPIM process using iron-based powders exhibiting different particle shapes and size distributions. Four low-viscosity feedstocks were mixed and injected into a rectangular mould cavity before being thermally wick-debound and finally sintered using identical debinding and sintering cycles. This study confirms that both irregular and spherical iron powders can be shaped via the LPIM process. The solid loadings obtained with these two powder morphologies, varying from 58 to 62 vol.-%, represent expected values. The trend in the density values obtained with irregular (∼6.6 g/cm3) and spherical (∼7.5 g/cm3) powders was validated by metallographic observations.
PiotterV, BauerW, KnitterR, Powder injection moulding of metallic and ceramic micro parts. Microsyst Technol. 2011;17:251–263.
6.
RuprechtR, GietzeltT, MüllerK, Injection molding of microstructured components from plastics, metals and ceramics. Microsyst Technol. 2002;8:351–358.
7.
MangelsJA.Low-pressure injection molding. Am Ceram Soc Bull States. 1994;73:37–41.
8.
ZorziJE, PerottoniCA, Da JornadaJAH.Hard-skin development during binder removal from Al2O3-based Green ceramic bodies. J Mater Sci. 2002;37:1801–1807.
9.
LiberatiJF, Araujo FilhoOO, MonteiroWA, Low-pressure injection molding processing of AISI T15 high speed steel powders. Mater Sci Forum. 2006;514–516:569–573.
10.
GonçalvesAC.Metallic powder injection molding using low pressure. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;118:193–198.
11.
LapointeF, TurenneS, JulienB.Low viscosity feedstocks for powder injection moulding. Powder Metall. 2009;52:338–344.
12.
MamenB, SongJ, BarriereT, Experimental and numerical analysis of the particle size effect on the densification behaviour of metal injection moulded tungsten parts during sintering. Powder Technol. 2015;270:230–243.
13.
KoseskiRP, SuriP, EarhardtNB, Microstructural evolution of injection molded gas- and water-atomized 316L stainless steel powder during sintering. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;390:171–177.
14.
HausnerovaB, MukundBN, SanetrnikD.Rheological properties of gas and water atomized 17-4PH stainless steel MIM feedstocks: effect of powder shape and size. Powder Technol. 2017;312:152–158.
15.
AliM, AhmadF.Influence of powder loading on rheology and injection molding of Fe-50Ni feedstocks. Mater Manuf Process. 2020;00:1–11.
16.
ParkSJ, WuY, HeaneyDF, Rheological and thermal debinding behaviors in titanium powder injection molding. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2009;40:215–222.
17.
HashikawaR, OsadaT, KudoK, Control the distortion of the large and complex shaped parts by the metal injection molding process. J Jpn Soc Powder Powder Metallurgy. 2016;63:473–478.
18.
DimitriC, MohamedS, ThierryB, Influence of particle-size distribution and temperature on the rheological properties of highly concentrated Inconel feedstock alloy 718. Powder Technol. 2017;322:273–289.
19.
SotomayorME, VárezA, LevenfeldB.Influence of powder particle size distribution on rheological properties of 316L powder injection moulding feedstocks. Powder Technol. 2010;200:30–36.
20.
HausnerováB, SáhaP, KubátJ.Capillary flow of hard-metal carbide powder compounds. Int Polym Process. 1999;14:254–260.
21.
HuY, LiY, LouJ, Potential of manufacturing low cost MIM stainless steel. Int J Met Met Phys. 2018;3:1–7.
22.
MukundBN, HausnerovaB.Variation in particle size fraction to optimize metal injection molding of water atomized 17–4PH stainless steel feedstocks. Powder Technol. 2020;368:130–136.
23.
DihoruL.V, SmithLN, GermanRM.Experimental analysis and neural network modelling of the rheological behaviour of powder injection moulding feedstocks formed with bimodal powder mixtures. Powder Metall. 2000;43:31–36.
24.
ContrerasJM, Jiménez-MoralesA, TorralbaJM.Fabrication of bronze components by metal injection moulding using powders with different particle characteristics. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209:5618–5625.
25.
ContrerasJM, Jiménez-MoralesA, TorralbaJM.Experimental and theoretical methods for optimal solids loading calculation in MIM feedstocks fabricated from powders with different particle characteristics. Powder Metall. 2010;53:34–40.
26.
ShuGJ, HwangKS.High density powder injection molded compacts prepared from a feedstock containing coarse powders. Mater Trans. 2004;45:2999–3004.
27.
RaneKK, DatePP.Rheological investigation of MIM feedstocks for reducing frictional effects during injection moulding. Adv Mater Res. 2014: 966–967: 196–205.
28.
RaneK, DateP.Evolution of properties of parts during MIM and sintering of recycled oxide particles. Powder Metall. 2019;62:133–145.
29.
MoghadamMS, FayyazA, ArdestaniM.Fabrication of titanium components by low-pressure powder injection moulding using hydride-dehydride titanium powder. Powder Technol. 2021;377:70–79.
30.
ASTM International. Standard test method for metal powder skeletal density by helium or nitrogen. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2016.
31.
ReiM, MilkeEC, GomesRM, Low-pressure injection molding processing of a 316-L stainless steel feedstock. Mater Lett. 2002;52:360–365.
32.
AminSYM, JamaludinKR, MuhamadN.Rheological properties of SS316L MIM feedstock prepared with different particle sizes and powder loadings. Inst Eng Malaysia. 2009;71:59–63.
33.
DemersV, TurenneS, ScalzoO.Impact of binders on viscosity of low-pressure powder injection molded Inconel 718 superalloy. J Mater Sci. 2015;50:2893–2902.
34.
TaftiAA, DemersV, VachonG, Effect of binder constituents and solids loading on the rheological behavior of irregular iron-based feedstocks. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2020;143:1–36.
35.
ASTM International. D3418-15 standard test method for transition temperatures and enthalpies of fusion and crystallization of polymers by differential scanning calorimetry. ASTM Standard. Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2015.
36.
FarehF, DemersV, DemarquetteNR, Influence of segregation on rheological properties of wax-based feedstocks. Powder Technol. 2017;320:273–284.
37.
YouWK, ChoiJP, YoonSM, Low temperature powder injection molding of iron micro-nano powder mixture. Powder Technol. 2012;228:199–205.
38.
MPIF Standard. Determination of density of compacted or sintered metal powders, 42. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton (NJ): 1986. p. 2–6.
39.
TradB MA, DemersV, CôtéR, Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of mold filling and segregation in low-pressure powder injection molding of metallic feedstock. Adv Powder Technol. 2020;31:1349–1358.
40.
HidalgoJ, Jiménez-MoralesA, TorralbaJM.Torque rheology of zircon feedstocks for powder injection moulding. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32:4063–4072.
41.
CheremisinoffNP.Advanced Polymer Processing Operations, Chap. 9: Application of polymer technology to metal injection molding (MIM) processing, by Foong ML, Tam KC. 1998, Elsevier Inc.: 213–280.
42.
Thomas-VielmaP, CerveraA, LevenfeldB, Production of alumina parts by powder injection molding with a binder system based on high density polyethylene. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;28:763–771.
43.
TaftiAA, DemersV, MajdiSM, Effect of thermal debinding conditions on the sintered density of low-pressure powder injection molded iron parts. Metals. 2021;11:1–13.
44.
ShinDS, JungID, KimHJ, Development of powder injection molding process for sintered soft magnet with the addition of Fe-17 at.% P powder. Met Powder Rep. 2018;73:38–45.
