In water atomization, a molten metal stream is fragmented by high-pressure water sprays by means of momentum transfer. In this work, a flat fan water spray is considered as a two-phase flow: water and a surrounding gas. An existing mathematical model for predicting the velocities of water droplets and entrained gas in a flat fan spray is improved. The total momentum flux of a spray is calculated for different spray travel distances, spray pressures and spray spreading angles, addressing the dependence of spray momentum flux on these parameters. A new quantity, the ‘effective momentum flux’, is introduced which also accounts for the effect of apex angle.
Finally, based on the results of lab-scale water atomization experiments, a correlation is proposed for the powder mass median size versus the effective momentum flux of the water spray, consolidating the influence of spray parameters including pressure, travel distance, spreading angle and apex angle.
PasupathyM, MartínJM, RivasA, Effect of the solidification time on the median particle size of powders produced by water atomisation. Powder Metall. 2016;59:128–141. doi:10.1080/00325899.2015.1117693.
GrandzolRJ, TallmadgeJA.Water jet atomization of molten steel. AIChE J. 1973;19:1149–1158. doi:10.1002/aic.690190611.
4.
NeikovOD.Handbook of non-ferrous metal powders technologies and applications. Elsevier; 2009. p. 102–142.
5.
DawesJ, BowermanR, TrepletonR.Introduction to the additive manufacturing powder metallurgy supply chain. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev. 2015;59:243–256. doi:10.1595/205651315X688686.
6.
SekiY, OkamotoS, TakigawaH, Effect of atomization variables on powder characteristics in the high-pressured water atomization process. Met Powder Rep. 1990;45:38–40. doi:10.1016/S0026-0657(10)80014-1.
7.
YenwisetS, YenwisetT.Effect of the molten metal stream's shape on particle size distribution of water atomized metal powder. Eng J. 2016;20:187–196. doi:10.4186/ej.2016.20.1.187.
8.
DunkleyJJ, PalmerJD.Factors affecting particle size of atomized metal powders. Powder Metall. 1986;29:287–290. doi:10.1179/pom.1986.29.4.287.
9.
SmallTJ, BruceS.The comparison of characteristics of water and inert gas atomized powders. Int J Powder Metall. 1968;4:7–17.
10.
KishidakaH., No title, in: Proc Multidiscip Meet ‘Sintered Met Magn Prop, Jpn Soc Powder Powder Metall. 1972:pp. 19–24.
11.
TernovoiYF, NichiporenkoOS.Process of dispersing a molten jet by an annular stream of high-pressure water. I. Hydrodynamic model of molten jet transformation into droplets. Powder Metall Met Ceram. 1993;32:1–6. doi:10.1007/BF00559724.
12.
TernovoiYF, NichiporenkoOS, MakogonVN, Process of dispersing a molten jet by an annular stream of high-pressure water. II. Experimental studies, semiempirical model for predicting powder particle-size composition. Powder Metall Met Ceram. 1993;32:99–102. doi:10.1007/BF00560029.
13.
BergquistB.New insights into influencing variables of water atomisation of iron. Powder Metall. 1999;42:331–343. doi:10.1179/003258999665684.
14.
LiuYZ, LiYY.A new general equation of mean particle size for different atomization processes. Mater Sci Forum. 2009;534:1–4.
15.
PerssonF, EliassonA, JönssonP.Prediction of particle size for water atomised metal powders: parameter study. Powder Metall. 2012;55:45–53. doi:10.1179/1743290111Y.0000000016.
16.
RothePH, BlockJA.Aerodynamic behavior of liquid sprays. Int J Multiph Flow. 1977;3:263–272. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(77)90006-4.
17.
MacGregorSA.Air entrainment in spray jets. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 1991;12:279–283.
18.
GhoshS, HuntJCR.Induced air velocity within droplet driven sprays. Proc - R Soc London. A. 1994;444:105–127. doi:10.1098/rspa.1994.0007.
19.
MillerPCH, Butler EllisMC, TuckCR.Entrained air and droplet velocities produced by agricultural flat-fan nozzles. At Sprays. 1996;6:693–707. doi:10.1615/AtomizSpr.v6.i6.40.
20.
AbbasAJ, NasrGG, BurbyML, Entrained air around a high pressure flat jet water spray. ILASS am. 25th Annu. Conf. Liq. At. Spray Syst., Pittsburgh; 2013.
21.
AsgarianA, TangZ, BussmannM, Water atomisation of metal powders: effect of water spray configuration. Powder Metall. 2020;63:288–299. doi:10.1080/00325899.2020.1802558.
22.
AltieriA, CryerSA, AcharyaL.Mechanisms, experiment, and theory of liquid sheet breakup and drop size from agricultural nozzles. At Sprays. 2014;24:695–721. doi:10.1615/atomizspr.2014008779.
23.
AltieriAL, CryerSA.Break-up of sprayed emulsions from flat-fan nozzles using a hole kinematics model. Biosyst Eng. 2018;169:104–114. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.02.006.
DombrowskiN, JohnsWR.The aerodynamic instability and disintegration of viscous liquid sheets. Chem Eng Sci. 1963;18:203–214.
26.
FraserRP, EisenklamP, DombrowskiN, Drop formation from rapidly moving liquid sheets. AIChE J. 1962;8:672–680. doi:10.1002/aic.690080522.
27.
AsgarianA, HeinrichM, SchwarzeR, Experiments and modeling of the breakup mechanisms of an attenuating liquid sheet. Int J Multiph Flow. 2020;130(Article 103347). doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103347.
28.
GrandzolRJ, TallmadgeJA.Effect of jet angle on water atomization. Int J Powder Metall Powder Technol. 1975;11:103–114.
PilchM, ErdmanCA.Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop. Int J Multiph Flow. 1987;13:741–757. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(87)90063-2.
31.
MikhailovMD, Silva FreireAP.The drag coefficient of a sphere: an approximation using shanks transform. Powder Technol. 2013;237:432–435. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2012.12.033.
32.
AsgarianA, YangZ, TangZ, An image feature consolidation technique (IFCT) to capture multi-range droplet size distributions in atomizing liquid sheets. Exp Fluids. 2020;61:(Article 14), doi:10.1007/s00348-019-2847-6..
DunkleyJJ.Metal powder atomisation methods for modern manufacturing. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev. 2019;63:226–232. doi:10.1595/205651319X15583434137356.
