Bartling vs. Superior Court, 163 Cot. App. 3d 186.
6.
Matter of Conroy. 486 A. 2d 1209.
7.
Bouvia vs. Superior Court. 86 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1317.
8.
Barber vs. Superior Court.147 Cal. App. 3d 1006.
9.
Barber vs. Superior Court.147 Cal. App. 3d 1006.
10.
Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Declaration on Euthanasia. June 26, 1980 as cited in Moral Responsibility in Prolonging life Decisions, edited by McCarthyDonald G., and MoraczewskiAlbert S., St. Louis: Pope John Center, 1981, pp. 290–297. See also. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government Priming Office. March, 1983.
11.
O'RourkeKevin D., and BrodeurDennisMedical Ethics: Common Ground for Understanding, The Catholic Health Association of the United States. St. Louis: 1986, p. 69.
12.
Committee for Pro-Life Activities. National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Statement on Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.Washington. D.C., June, 1986.
13.
O'RourkeKevinEthical Issues in Health Care: The AMA Statement on Tube Feeding: Ethical Analysis, St. Louis University Medical Center. Center For Health Care Ethics, VII 8, April, 1986.
14.
Committee for Pro-life Activities. National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Statement on Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.Washington. D.C., June, 1986.
15.
O'Rourkc. Ethical Issues in Health Care, op. cit.
16.
Extended Statement by. Archbishop Roger Mahony on the Unanimous Ruling of the California 2nd District Court of Appeal on the Case of Elizabeth Bouvia. Archdiocese of Los Angeles. April, 1986.
17.
Extended Statement by. Archbishop Roger Mahony on the Unanimous Ruling of the California 2nd District Court of Appeal on the Case of Elizabeth Bouvia. Archdiocese of Los Angeles. April, 1986.
18.
MeCormiekS.J., Richard“Caring or Starving? The Case of Claire Conroy.”America152 (April 6, 1985): 269–273.
