Abstract

SS01 OPTIMIZING TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: DEFINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFICACY, SAFETY AND ADHERENCE
(CME LLC & Bristol-Myers Squibb)
Samuel J. Keith, Timothy J. Lambert, Anthony Harris
Along with the recent increase in the use atypical antipsychotics, came the recognition that while these agents reduce the potential for specific side effects such as extrapyramidal symptoms, they also have the potential to increase the likelihood of other side effects, including those that can lead to metabolic syndrome. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics vary such that each agent has an individual and distinct side effect profile. The pharmacodynamics of each individual atypical antipsychotic appears to impact the efficacy and the safety of the agent.
Because of the increased incidence of intolerable side effects, many patients fail to remain compliant with their antipsychotic medication. Poor compliance with medication regimens leads to increased relapse rates, increased hospitalization rates and costs, and a poorer long-term prognosis. The high rates of non-adherence and the increased potential for metabolic side effects of antipsychotic medications have forced physicians to consider switching from one agent to another for patients who are experiencing intolerable adverse effects. Due to the lack of guidelines, physicians need to be aware of current switching strategies in order to ensure the smoothest possible transition from one antipsychotic agent to another.
Throughout this educational symposium, the faculty will describe the current factors that affect compliance, including the efficacy and safety profiles of atypical antipsychotics, how their individual pharmacodynamic profiles potentially impact the safety profiles of each agent, and how and when to consider switching from one antipsychotic medication to another in order to ensure the best possible outcomes for their patients.
SS02 REINTEGRATION OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICINE IN PATIENTS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS
(Pfizer Australia)
Norman Sartorius, Charles H. Hennekens, Leon H. Chapman, John W. Newcomer
An increasing body of evidence suggests that in comparison to the general population, patients with severe mental illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder have worse physical health and shorter life expectancy. Currently the evidence is particularly strong for schizophrenia and affective disorders. Poverty, urbanization, smoking, and reduced access to medical care contribute to cardiometabolic risk. Treatment-induced weight gain and dyslipidemia, which increase risk for diabetes mellitus and CVD, have been observed in patients treated with some second-generation antipsychotic agents.
Although persons with mental illness are at greater risk of developing medical conditions, many mental healthcare providers do not screen for, assess, or address possible medical conditions; these patients generally receive a lower level of medical care. There is growing interest in the lack of coordination of services between mental health and other specialists and primary care practitioners.
At the conclusion of this symposium, the participant should be able to (1) discuss the global increase in CVD and diabetes mellitus, as well as the elevated rates of morbidity and mortality from these conditions among patients with mental illness; (2) describe the interaction between mental and physical health and examine the impact of each on the other, as related to treatment choice; (3) analyze differences in medical care due to issues of access and compliance; and (4) present the role of psychiatry in forming strategies that optimize medical and mental outcomes in patients with mental illness and promote parity of care.
SS03 LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN DIFFERENT CULTURES
(Janssen-Cilag)
Bruce Singh, Norman Sartorius, Wolfgang Fleischhacker
Professor Sartorius is described as one of the most influential modern day psychiatrists. In particular, Professor Sartorius has championed a campaign to reduce the stigma associated with schizophrenia. Professor Sartorius joined the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1967 and soon assumed charge of the programme of epidemiology in social psychiatry. He was also principal investigator of several major international studies on schizophrenia, on depression and on health service delivery. In June 1993 Professor Sartorius was elected President of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and served as President-elect and then President until August 1999. In January 1999, Professor Sartorius was elected President of the Association of European Psychiatrists (AEP). Professor Sartorius holds professorial appointments at the Universities of London, Prague and Zagreb and at several other universities in the USA and China. Professor Sartorius has published more than 300 articles in scientific journals, authored or co-authored several books and edited a number of others. In this symposium, he will discuss cultural differences for the long term outcomes for patients with schizophrenia.
Professor Fleishhacker is the Vice Chair and Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at Innsbruck University Clinics in Austria, where he also serves as head of the Department of Biological Psychiatry. He is a certified psychotherapist with a specialty in behavioural therapy. Professor Fleischhacker is a member of the editorial boards of several peer reviewed journals, co-editor of the Schizophrenia Section for Current Opinion in Psychiatry and managing editor of the Journal Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.
Professor Fleischhacker's main research interests relate to schizophrenia and psychopharmacology. They have led to participation in World Health Organization and World Psychiatric Association programs focusing on schizophrenia. In this symposium, he will discuss long term outcomes for patients with schizophrenia with improved medication adherence and use of long acting atypical injections.
SS04 IMPORTANCE OF RHYTHM
(Servier)
Graham Burrows, Dave Kennaway, Ian Hickie, David Cunnington
SS05 UNIQUE CHALLENGES OF MANAGING DEPRESSION IN MID-LIFE WOMEN
(CME Outfitters & Wyeth)
Mario Maj, Claudio Soares, Lorraine Dennerstein
Depression among women in mid-life is a significant cause of disability.[1] It is hard to recognize and treat owing to lack of awareness of its unique manifestations and its multi-factorial etiology.[2] There are several presentations of depression in mid-life and several treatment options; nevertheless there is significant inconsistency in how patients are managed. Given the health burden of depression among perimenopausal women in terms of quality of life and medical costs, it is incumbent upon physicians to learn how to properly diagnose and treat these patients. There is an urgent need for psychiatrists to be able to recognize depression in this population and to understand how to weigh potential treatment options in light of other ongoing medical and psychosocial issues. In this interactive symposium, the experts will examine the unique clinical features of depression among perimenopausal women with an emphasis on proper diagnosis and treatment.
At the end of the CE activity, participants should be able to:
Recognize the unique features of depression in mid-life women Develop tailored treatment plans for women with mid-life depression Evaluate the clinical implications of comorbid medical and/or psychosocial conditions on patient management
SS06 CAN THE OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE SPECTRUM CONCEPT BE SUPPORTED? SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES AMONGST PUTATIVE OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE SPECTRUM DISORDERS
(Lundbeck)
Michael Kyrios, Carl Zabel, Paul McQueen, David Castle, Susan L. Rossell, Damiaan Denys
describe a range of putative OCS disorders (compulsive buying, problem gambling, body dysmorphic disorder [BDD]) and compare these with OCD, the “gold standard” OCS disorder. examine cognitive, personality and other psychological aspects of a range of putative OCS disorders. Discuss possible changes and issues relating to DSM-V.
Professor Paul Salkovskis from the Institute of Psychiatry has agreed to act as a Discussant and will lead further discussion by the Symposium participants around the issue of whether the concept of OCS disorders can be supported.
CHARACTERIZING COMPULSIVE BUYING: IMPULSE CONTROL, OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE, MOOD OR OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER?
Michael Kyrios, Carl Zabel, Paul McQueen
BDD AND OCD: THE SAME, BUT DIFFERENT?
David Castle
COGNITION IN BDD AND OCD: RECENT DATA ON SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
Susan L. Rossell
CONCEPT OF IMPULSIVITY AND COMPULSIVITY IN OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE SPECTRUM DISORDERS
Damiaan Denys
SS07 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM THE CATIE STUDY
(Eli Lilly)
Jeffrey A. Lieberman, T. Scott Stroup, Joseph P. McEvoy, Marvin S. Swartz, Robert A. Rosenheck, Diana O. Perkins, Richard S. E. Keefe, Sonia M. Davis, Clarence E. Davis, Barry Lebowitz, John Hsiao, Joanne Severe
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) initiated the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) program to evaluate antipsychotic drugs in clinical situations. The CATIE schizophrenia trial compares relative effectiveness among and between first generation antipsychotic drugs (FGAs), introduced in the 1950′s, and second generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAs), used extensively since their introduction in the 1990′s.
Approximately 50 US sites enrolled 1,500 persons with schizophrenia. The primary outcome was all-cause treatment discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, side effects, neurocognitive functioning, and cost effectiveness. Phase I, double-blind and randomized, compared treatment with SGAs olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone to perphenazine, a midpotency FGA. If the initially assigned medication was not effective, subjects could choose a Phase II trial: (1) randomization to open-label clozapine or a double-blinded SGA that was available but not assigned in Phase I; or (2) double-blinded randomization to ziprasidone or another SGA that was available but not assigned in Phase I. If the Phase II study drug was discontinued, subjects could enter Phase III, an open-label treatment based on the individual's experience in Phases I and II. The initial efficacy and safety results of Phases I and II of the trial have been reported (Lieberman et al [2005], Stroup et al. [2006], McEvoy et al [2006]).
The CATIE study indicates, not unexpectedly, that medications work; but with substantial limitations. In fact, 74% of patients elected to seek something better, rather than stay on their assigned medication. The biggest surprise was that the older medication, perphenazine, was comparably effective to at least 3 newer SGA medications, and not much worse than the best SGA, olanzapine. However, olanzapine had the most side effect incidence of weight gain and changes in glucose and lipid metabolism. Contrary to expectations, the older medication did not cause substantially more neurological side effects than the newer; we believe, because we administered a lower potency APD at moderate doses.
In Phase II for patients who discontinued their Phase I medication due to lack of symptom control and went into the clozapine pathway, clozapine was substantially better than all the other SGA medications.
In Phase II for patients who discontinued their Phase I medication and went into the ziprasidone pathway, it is important to examine the results separately, per the reason for discontinuance. If the reason was inadequate control of psychotic symptoms, those taking olanzapine or risperidone stayed on their medication significantly longer than those taking quetiapine or ziprasidone. If the reason was side effects, no significant difference among the four Phase II medications was revealed. Thus, the success of symptom control and side effects experienced by the patient on the first medication may help predict which medication may be more successful next.
The CATIE Phase II results show that for patients whose symptoms are not wholly responsive to other antipsychotic medications, clozapine is an effective choice for the next step. Olanzapine and risperidone are more effective than ziprasidone and quetiapine. But olanzapine is associated with substantial weight gain and metabolic problems, while ziprasidone is consistently associated with reduction in weight and improvement in metabolic indicators.
