Abstract
A detection model (originally proposed by Quick) comprising, in a sequence of linear analysers, varphi1, …, varphi n , nonlinear transducer functions, and the Minkowski decision rule, is widely used, especially when it is necessary to take into account the effect of probability summation. However, there is a general belief that the analyser characteristics cannot be determined in detection experiments since there is a trade-off between these characteristics and the decision rule. Here we show how to overcome this problem, ie how to identify the analysers varphi1, …, varphi n despite the probability summation between them.
The observer's performance is assumed to be quantitatively defined in terms of an equidetection surface (EDS). Each analyser varphi i is expressed as a weighted sum of linear (coordinate) analysers {phi j }: varphi i =sumj=1 n a ij phi j , so that an identification of the analysers {phi i } is then reduced to evaluating the weight matrix A={a ij }. It has been proven that A can be uniquely recovered from an ellipsoidal approximation of EDS in the neighbourhood of at least two points. More specifically, the following equation holds true: A−1DA=H1−1H2, where D is a diagonal matrix, H1 and H2 are the matrices of the quadratic forms determining the n-dimensional ellipsoids approximating EDS. Thus, the matrix H1−1H2 known from experiment is a similarity transform of the diagonal matrix, the columns of A being the eigenvectors of H1−1H2. Hence, any eigensystem routine can be used to derive A from H1−1H2.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
