Abstract
Two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) methods which are routinely used in psychophysics provide criterion-free sensitivity measures but at a high price: 2AFC procedures generally need 2 – 3 times the number of trials than a simple yes/no design to achieve the same level of threshold variability. Similarly, signal detection methods provide measures for criterion and sensitivity, but they require predetermined signal levels for the presented stimuli and also need a large number of trials.
ASIDT (adaptive signal detection testing) combines rating responses with an adaptive stimulus placement strategy according to the accelerated stochastic approximation method (see Treutwein, 1995 Vision Research
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
