Abstract
Under polar projection (the natural projection for visual scenes) motion parallax is a powerful cue specifying relative depth. For small-field stimuli, it is ambiguous in the sense that a concave surface can be perceived as convex and deforming. By contrast, concavity/convexity of wide-field surfaces is unambiguously perceived. This led us to hypothesise a critical role of the 3-D rigidity constraint for large visual scenes in motion (Dijkstra et al, 1995 Vision Research
To examine this hypothesis, we exposed subjects to planes inclined in space, and asked them to report the tilt (direction of inclination). Depth was specified either by motion parallax (MP, the surface oscillated around a frontoparallel axis) or by static perspective cues (SP, orthogonal square grids drawn on the plane).
At ECVP95, we had reported a predominance of SP over MP when the tilts specified by these two cues (tMP and tSP respectively) differed (1995 Perception
Therefore, in a conflict situation between MP and SP, surface orientation is reported according to a winner-take-all rule, which is largely in favour of static grid-cues. Hence, even for wide-field movements, the image contrast distribution can lead the visual system to prefer an unrigid, rather than rigid, solution to the 3-D shape-from-motion problem.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
