BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147.
2.
BiedermanI, 2000“Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory”Spatial Vision13241–253.
3.
BiedermanIBarM, 1997“What's the fuss about perceiving depth-rotated objects?”paper presented at the Meetings of the Psychonomics Society, Philadelphia, PA, November.
4.
BiedermanIBarM, 1998“Same – different matching of depth-rotated objects”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science391113 (abstract).
5.
BiedermanIBarM, 1999“One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects”Vision Research392885–2899.
6.
BiedermanICooperE E, 1991a“Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming”Perception20585–593.
7.
BiedermanICooperE E, 1991b“Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition”Cognitive Psychology23393–419.
8.
BiedermanICooperE E, 1992“Size invariance in visual object priming”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18121–133.
9.
BiedermanIGerhardsteinP C, 1993“Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for 3D viewpoint invariance”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance191162–1182.
10.
BiedermanIGerhardsteinP C, 1995“Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance211506–1514.
11.
BoussaoudDDesimoneRUngerleiderL, 1991“Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque”Journal of Comparative Neurology306554–575.
12.
BricoloEBülthoffH H, 1992“Translation-invariant features for object recognition”Perception21 Supplement 2, 59 (abstract).
13.
CooperE EBiedermanIHummelJ E, 1992“Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence”Canadian Journal of Psychology46191–214.
14.
DiCarloJ JMaunsellJ H R, 2003“Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position”Journal of Neurophysiology893264–3278.
15.
DillMEdelmanS, 2001“Imperfect invariance to object translation in the discrimination of complex shapes”Perception30707–724.
16.
EllisRAllportD A, 1986“Multiple levels of representation for visual objects; A behavioural study”, in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications Eds CohenA GThomasJ R, (New York: John Wiley) pp 245–257.
17.
FiserJBiedermanI, 1995“Size invariance in visual object priming of gray-scale images”Perception24741–748.
18.
FiserJBiedermanI, 2001“Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere”Vision Research41221–234.
19.
FiserJBiedermanICooperE E, 1996“To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human shape recognition?”Spatial Vision10237–271.
20.
Grill-SpectorKKourtziZKanwisherN, 2001“The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition”Vision Research411409–1422.
21.
HaywardW G, 1998“Effects of outline shape in object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24427–440.
22.
HaywardW GTarrM J, 1997“Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance231511–1521.
23.
HayworthK JBiedermanI, 2006“Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition”Vision Research464024–4031.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, 1987Visual Object Processing: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
26.
JamesT WCulhamJHumphreyG KMilnerA DGoodaleM A, 2003“Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: An fMRI study”Brain1262463–2475.
27.
KayaertGBiedermanIVogelsR, 2003“Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex”Journal of Neuroscience233016–3027.
28.
KourtziZKanwisherN, 2001“Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital cortex”Science2931506–1509.
29.
KravitzD JVinsonL DBakerC I, 2008“How position-dependent is visual object recognition?”Trends in Cognitive Sciences12114–122.
30.
LogothetisN KPaulsJ, 1995“Psychophysical and physiological evidence for view-centered object representations in the primate”Cerebral Cortex5270–288.
31.
OrbanG AVanEssenDVanduffelW, 2004“Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans”Trends in Cognitive Sciences8315–324.
32.
RollsE TDecoG, 2002The Computational Neuroscience of Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
33.
SaryGVogelsROrbanG A, 1993“Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons”Science260995–997.
34.
TarrM JWilliamsPHaywardW GGauthierI, 1998“Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent”Nature Neuroscience1275–277.
35.
TovéeM JRollsE TAzzopardiP, 1994“Translation-invariance in the responses to faces of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the alert macaque”Journal of Neurophysiology721049–1060.
36.
VuilleumierPHensonR NDriverJDolanR J, 2002“Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming”Nature Neuroscience5491–499.
37.
WinstonP H, 1975“Learning structural descriptions from examples”, in The Psychology of Computer Vision Ed. WinstonP H, (New York: McGraw-Hill).
38.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147.
39.
BülthoffH HEdelmanS, 1992“Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA8960–64.
40.
BülthoffH HEdelmanS YTarrM J, 1995“How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?”Cerebral Cortex5247–260.
EdelmanS, 1995“Representation of similarity in three-dimensional object discrimination”Neural Computation7408–423.
43.
FellemanD JVan EssenD C, 1991“Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex”Cerebral Cortex11–47.
44.
FoldiakP, 1991“Learning invariance from transformation sequences”Neural Computation3194–200.
45.
FukushimaK, 1980“Neocognitron: A self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position”Biological Cybernetics36193–202.
46.
Grill-SpectorKMalachR, 2004“The human visual cortex”Annual Review of Neuroscience27649–677.
47.
HummelJ EBiedermanI, 1992“Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition”Psychological Review99480–517.
48.
HungC PKreimanGPoggioTDiCarloJ J, 2005“Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex”Science310863–866.
49.
KobatakeEWangGTanakaK, 1998“Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys”Journal of Neurophysiology80324–330.
50.
KourtziZShiffrarM, 1997“One-shot view invariance in a moving world”Psychological Science8461–466.
51.
LogothetisN KPaulsJPoggioT, 1995“Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys”Current Biology5552–563.
52.
MarrDNishiharaH K, 1978“Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B200269–294.
53.
QuirogaR QReddyLKreimanGKochCFriedI, 2005“Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain”Nature4351102–1107.
54.
RiesenhuberMPoggioT, 1999“Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex”Nature Neuroscience21019–1025.
55.
RollsE T, 1995“Learning mechanisms in the temporal lobe visual cortex”Behavioural Brain Research66177–185.
56.
RollsE T, 2000“Functions of the primate temporal lobe cortical visual areas in invariant visual object and face recognition”Neuron27205–218.
57.
UllmanSSolovievS, 1999“Computation of pattern invariance in brain-like structures”Neural Networks121021–1036.
58.
WallisGBülthoffH H, 2001“Effects of temporal association on recognition memory”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA984800–4804.
59.
WallisGRollsE T, 1997“Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system”Progress in Neurobiology51167–194.
60.
WiskottLSejnowskiT J, 2002“Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances”Neural Computation14715–770.
61.
ZoccolanDKouhMPoggioTDiCarloJ J, 2007“Trade-off between object selectivity and tolerance in monkey inferotemporal cortex”Journal of Neuroscience2712292–12307.
62.
BarenholtzEFeldmanJ, 2003“Visual comparisons within and between object parts: Evidence for a single-part superiority effect”Vision Research431655–1666.
63.
BertaminiMMoscaF, 2004“Early computation of contour curvature and part structure: Evidence from holes”Perception3335–48.
64.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147.
65.
BiedermanI, 2008“Translational and reflectional priming invariance: A retrospective” This volume.
66.
BiedermanICooperE E, 1991“Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition”Cognitive Psychology23393–419.
67.
BiedermanICooperE E, 1992“Size invariance in visual object priming”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18121–133.
68.
BiedermanIGerhardsteinP C, 1993“Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance191162–1182.
69.
DemeyerMZaenenPWagemansJ, 2007“Low-level correlations between object properties and viewpoint can cause viewpoint-dependent object recognition”Spatial Vision2079–106.
70.
De WinterJWagemansJ, 2006“Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale, integrative study”Cognition99275–325.
71.
FosterD HGilsonS J, 2002“Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B2691939–1947.
72.
HaywardW G, 2003“After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?”Trends in Cognitive Sciences7425–427.
73.
HummelJ EBiedermanI, 1992“Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition”Psychological Review99480–517.
74.
KukkonenH TFosterD HWoodJ RWagemansJVan GoolL, 1996“Qualitative cues in the discrimination of affine-transformed minimal patterns”Perception25195–206.
75.
PanisSDe WinterJVandekerckhoveJWagemansJ, 2008“Identification of everyday objects on the basis of fragmented versions of outlines”Perception37271–289.
76.
TulvingESchacterD L, 1990“Priming and human memory systems”Science247301–306.
77.
Van GoolLMoonsTPauwelsEWagemansJ, 1994“Invariance from the Euclidean geometer's perspective”Perception23547–561.
78.
VanrieJWillemsBWagemansJ, 2001“Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features”Perception301047–1056.
79.
WagemansJ, 1992“Perceptual use of nonaccidental properties”Canadian Journal of Psychology46236–279.
80.
WagemansJ, 1993“Skewed symmetry: A nonaccidental property used to perceive visual forms”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19364–380.
81.
WagemansJVan GoolLLamoteC, 1996“The visual system's measurement of invariants need not itself be invariant”Psychological Science7232–236.
82.
WagemansJVan GoolLLamoteCFosterD H, 2000“Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26443–468.
83.
WillemsBWagemansJ, 2001“Matching multi-component objects from different viewpoints: Mental rotation as normalization?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance271090–1115.