We found that the imaginary line passing through two stimuli that points to an eye appears to do so when seen monocularly, which is consistent with Porterfield's axiom but inconsistent with Wells's proposition regarding visual direction. We also found that the imaginary line appears to point to the bridge of the nose when the near stimulus is seen binocularly and the far one is seen monocularly, which is consistent with Wells's proposition but inconsistent with Porterfield's axiom. We argue that these findings themselves do not necessarily vitiate the axiom or the proposition and that one should explore the different experimental conditions and hypothesize about the processes that might be involved.
BrewsterD. (1844). On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision, and on the representation of solid figures by the union of dissimilar planes on the retinal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 15349–368.
2.
ErkelensC. J. (2000). Perceived direction during monocular viewing is based on signals of the viewing eye only. Vision Research, 402411–2419.
3.
ErkelensC. J.van EeR. (2002). The role of the cyclopean eye in vision: Sometimes inappropriate always irrelevant. Vision Research, 421157–1163.
4.
HelmholtzH. (1962). Handbook of physiological optics (SouthallP. C., Trans.). New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1910).
5.
HeringE. (1942). Spatial sense and movements of the eye (RaddeC. A., Trans.). Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry. (Original work published 1879).
6.
HowardI. P.RogersB. J. (2012). Perceiving in depth. Vol. 2: Stereoscopic vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
KhokhotvaM.OnoH.MappA. P. (2005). The cyclopean eye is relevant for predicting visual direction. Vision Research, 452339–2234.
8.
LeConteJ. (1881). Sight: An exposition of the principles of monocular and binocular vision. New York: Appleton. (Revision published 1897).
9.
MappA. P.OnoH.HowardI. P. (2012). Binocular visual direction. In HowardI. P.RogersB. J. (Eds.), Perceiving in depth. Vol. 2: Stereoscopic vision (pp. 232–247). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
OnoH.BarbeitoR. (1985). Utrocular discrimination is not sufficient for utrocular identification. Vision Research, 25289–299.
11.
OnoH.GondaG. (1978). Apparent movement, eye movement and phoria when two eyes alternate in viewing a stimulus. Perception, 775–83. [Reprinted in RockI. (Ed.). (1997). Indirect perception (pp. 265–276)—title changed to: Apparent motion based on changing phoria. Cambridge: MIT Press].
12.
OnoH.MappA. P.HowardI. P. (2002). The cyclopean eye in vision: The new and old data continue to hit you right between the eyes. Vision Research, 421307–1324.
13.
OnoH.TamW. J.McConnellS. (1983). Apparent displacement with a monocular prism differs from optical displacement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9652–656.
14.
OnoH.WadeN. J. (2012). Two historical strands in studying visual direction. Japanese Psychological Research, 5471–88.
15.
OnoH.WeberE. V. (1981). Nonveridical visual direction produced by monocular viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7937–947.
16.
PorterfieldW. (1737). An essay concerning the motions of our eyes: Part I. Of their external motions. Edinburgh Medical Essays and Observations, 3160–263.
17.
RoelofsC. O. (1959). Considerations on the visual egocentre. Acta Psychologica, 16226–234.
18.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
TempletonW. B.GreenF. A. (1968). Chance results in utrocular discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20200–203.
20.
TowneJ. (1866). Contributions to the physiology of binocular vision—Section VII. Guy's Hospital Reports, 12285–301.
21.
WellsW. C. (1792). An essay upon single vision with two eyes: Together with experiments and observations on several other subjects in optics. London: Cadell.
