The paper presents a phenomenal investigation of monocular perception of perspectival reversal of a conical shell. The inverted shell is seen as shorter than the stimulus, and both relative size of elements within it and movement within it appear to be affected by reversal. Similarity of the observed effects to those recorded in studies of afterimages are noted, as is similarity to reversals of Mach's Book.
BergströmS. S., & GustafssonK.-A. (2011). Concave and convex phases in ambiguous figures showing colour shifts. Mach's figure and the AMBEGUJAS phenomenon. Perception, 40, 30–38
2.
BrislinR. W., & KeatingC. F. (1976). Cultural differences in the perception of a three-dimensional Ponzo illusion. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 7, 397–412
3.
BroerseJ.AshtonR., & ShawC. (1992). The apparent shape of after-images in the Ames room. Perception, 21, 261–268
4.
ClementR. A. (1996). Apparent shape of the Mach book. Perception, 25, 313–319
5.
DaviesP. (1973). The role of central processes in the perception of visual after-images. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 325–338
6.
DeręgowskiJ. B., & McGeorgeP. (2007). Rock art and Thiéry's figure. Rock Art Research, 24, 251–253
7.
DeręgowskiJ. B., & ParkerD. N. (1992). Three-space inference from two-space stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 397–403
8.
DwyerJ.AshtonR., & BroerseJ. (1990). Emmert's law in Ames room. Perception, 19, 35–41
9.
GregoryR. L. (1963). Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature, 199, 678–690
10.
GregoryR. L. (2009). Seeing through illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press
11.
HansenA. K. (1954). After-image transfer test in anomalous retinal correspondence. AMA Ophthalmological Archives, 52, 369–374
12.
HochbergJ. (1961). Perception: II. Space and movement. In KlingJ. W. & RiggsL. A. (Eds), Woodworth & Schlosberg Experimental Psychology (pp. 475–550). London: Methuen
13.
KitzingerE. (1976). Stylistic developments in pavement mosaics in the Greek East from the age of Constantine to the age of Justinian. In KleinbauerW. E. (Ed.), The art of Byzantium and the medieval West: Selected studies by Ernst Kitzinger (pp. 64–88). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
14.
NozawaS. (1999). Depth reversal of Mach's book and lightness constancy. Perception, 29 (ECVP Supplement), 63b (Abstract)
15.
PapathomasT. V., & BonoL. M. (2004). Experiments with a hollow mask and reverse perspective: Top—down influences in the inversion effect for 3-D stimuli. Perception, 33, 1129–1138
16.
ParinaudH. (1882). Du siège cérébral des images accidentelles ou consécutives. Gazette des Hôpitaux, 55, 459–463
17.
TerwilligerR. F. (1963). Evidence for a relationship between figural after-effects and after-images. The American Journal of Psychology, 76, 306–310
18.
ThiéryA. (1895). Über geometrisch-optische Täuschungen. Philosophische Studien, 11, 307–370
