When we see an object, we know where it is. Or do we? Perhaps not in indirect vision, as was observed by the gestalt psychologist Korte in 1923. Objects and object parts appear to ‘dance around’, and these phenomena may underlie a part of what is called the crowding effect today. From Korte's account of pattern recognition in indirect vision, I select two phenomena: A loss of the positional code for letter parts and a loss of the same for whole letters. Using these examples, I present a novel, speculative explanation for a contradiction in the literature: patterns located more peripherally than a target show more interference than do more centrally located patterns, yet for whole-letter confusions the asymmetry is the other way round. The inward, not the outward, flanker is increasingly confused with a target at increasing target eccentricities. I propose that feature-binding decreases with eccentricity such that free-floating letter parts more often intrude from the periphery and whole letters from the centre. I conclude with a few remarks on computational modelling as, hopefully, a challenge to neural computationalists.
AubertH. R.FoersterC. F. R. (1857). Beiträge zur Kenntniss des indirecten Sehens. (I). Untersuchungen über den Raumsinn der Retina. Archiv für Ophthalmologie, 3, 1–37.
2.
BalasB.NakanoL.RosenholtzR. (2009). A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(12):13, 1–18.
3.
BexP. J.DakinS. C.SimmersA. J. (2003). The shape and size of crowding for moving targets. Vision Research, 43, 2895–2904.
4.
BoumaH. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767–782.
5.
CarrascoM. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484–1525.
6.
ChastainG. (1982). Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 576–580.
7.
ChastainG. (1983). Task and contrast effects on performance with parafoveal stimulus pairs. Psychological Research, 45, 147–156.
8.
ClemmesenV. (1944). Central and indirect vision of the light-adapted eye. Acta Ophthalmologica, 22, 317–318.
9.
CollierR. M. (1931). An experimental study of form perception in indirect vision. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 11, 281–290.
10.
Di LolloV. (2012). The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 317–321.
11.
EhlersH. E. (1953). Clinical testing of visual acuity. Archives of Ophthalmology, 49, 431–434.
12.
EstesW. K.AllmeyerD. H.RederS. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 1–15.
13.
EstesW. K.WolfordG. L. (1971). Effects of spaces on report from tachistoscopically presented letter strings. Psychonomic Science, 25, 77–80.
14.
FreemanJ.ChakravarthiR.PelliD. G. (2012). Substitution and pooling in crowding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 379–396.
15.
GalvinS. J.O'SheaR. P.SquireA. M.GovanD. G. (1997). Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision. Vision Research, 37, 2035–2039.
16.
GalvinS. J.O'SheaR. P.SquireA. M.HailstoneD. S. (1999). Sharpness overconstancy: The roles of visibility and current context. Vision Research, 39, 2649–2657.
17.
GeisslerL. R. (1926). Form perception in indirect vision. Psychological Bulletin, 23, 135–136 (Abstract).
18.
HeldC. (2006). Mental models as objectual representations. In HeldC.VosgerauG.KnauffM. (Eds.), Mental models & the mind (pp. 237–253). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19.
HeringE. (1879). Über Muskelgeräusche des Auges. Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Abt. III, 79, 137–154.
20.
HuberD. E.ShiffrinR. M.LyleK. B.QuachR. (2002). Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 2. Effects of prime similarity and target duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1120–1136.
21.
HueckA. (1840). Von den Gränzen des Sehvermögens [On the limits of vision]. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin, 82–97.
22.
JonidesJ. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control of over the mind's eye's movement. In LongJ. B.BaddeleyA. D. (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 187–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
JurinJ. (1738). An essay on distinct and indistinct vision. In SmithR. (Ed.), A compleat system of opticks in four books, viz. a popular, a mathematical, a mechanical, and a philosophical treatise (pp. 115–171). Cambridge: Published by the author.
24.
KeshvariS.RosenholtzR. (2013). A high-dimensional pooling model accounts for seemingly conflicting substitution effects in crowding. Journal of Vision, 13, 576.
25.
KirschmannA. (1889). Über die Helligkeitsempfindung im indirecten Sehen. Philosophische Studien (Wundt), 5, 447–497.
26.
KirschmannA. (1908). Über die Erkennbarkeit geometrischer Figuren und Schriftzeichen im indirecten Sehen. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 13, 352–388.
27.
KoenderinkJ. (2014). The All Seeing Eye?Perception, 43, 1–6.
28.
KöllnerH. (1920). XII. Die Untersuchung des indirekten Sehens. In EngelkingE.ErggeletH.KöllnerH.LangenhanF.NordensonJ. W.VogtA. (Eds.), Die Untersuchungsmethoden. Handbuch der gesamten Augenheilkunde (pp. 394–552). Berlin: Julius Springer Verlag.
29.
KorteW. (1923). Über die Gestaltauffassung im indirekten Sehen [On the apprehension of gestalt in indirect vision]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 93, 17–82.
30.
KrumhanslC. L. (1977). Naming and locating simultaneously and sequentially presented letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 293–302.
31.
LettvinJ. Y. (1976). On seeing sidelong. The Sciences, 16, 10–20.
32.
LeviD. M. (2008). Crowding—an essential bottleneck for object recognition: A minireview. Vision Research, 48, 635–654.
33.
LindsayP. H.NormanD. A. (1972). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. New York: Academic Press.
MumfordD. (1991). On the computational architecture of the neocortex I. The role of the thalamo-cortical loop. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 135–145.
36.
MumfordD. (1992). On the computational architecture of the neocortex II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biological Cybernetics, 66, 241–251.
37.
NakayamaK.MacKebenM. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631–1647.
38.
NandyA. S.TjanB. S. (2007). The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. Journal of Vision, 7(2):5, 1–26.
39.
PelliD. G.PalomaresM.MajajN. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12):12, 1136–1169.
40.
PelliD. G.TillmanK. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1129–1135 (plus online supplement).
41.
PetrovY.PoppleA. V.McKeeS. P. (2007). Crowding and surround suppression: Not to be confused. Journal of Vision, 7(2):12, 1–9.
42.
PurkinjeJ. E. (1823). De Examine Physiologico Organi visus et Systematis Cutanei. Breslau.
43.
PurkinjeJ. E. (1825). Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Sehens in subjectiver Hinsicht. Berlin: G. Reimer.
44.
RogersB. (2010). Stimuli, information, and the concept of illusion. Perception, 39, 285–288.
45.
RumelhartD. E.McClellandJ. L. & the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
SelfridgeO. (1959). Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Symposium on Mechanisation of Thought Processes, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, November 1958 (Vol. 1, pp 513–526). London: HMSO.
47.
SongS.LeviD. M.PelliD. G. (2014). A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening. Journal of Vision, 14(5):3, 1–37.
48.
StrasburgerH. (2005). Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. Journal of Vision, 5(11), 1024–1037.
49.
StrasburgerH.HarveyL. O. J.RentschlerI. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495–508.
50.
StrasburgerH.MalaniaM. (2013). Source confusion is a major cause of crowding. Journal of Vision, 13(1):24, 1–20.
51.
StrasburgerH.PöppelE. (2002). Visual field. In AdelmanG. S.SmithB.H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (3rd ed., pp 2127–2129). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
52.
StrasburgerH.RentschlerI.JüttnerM. (2011). Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: A review. Journal of Vision, 11(5):13, 1–82.
53.
StuartJ. A.BurianH. M. (1962). A study of separation difficulty: Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 53, 471–477.
54.
TreismanA. M.GeladeG. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
55.
TylerC. W.LikovaL. T. (2007). Crowding: A neuroanalytic approach. Journal of Vision, 7(2):16, 1–9.
56.
von HelmholtzH. (1871). Über die Zeit, welche nöthig ist, damit ein Gesichtseindruck zum Bewusstsein kommt [On the time required for a visual impression to reach consciousness]. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Juni, 333–337.
57.
WadeN. J. (2005). Perception and illusion: Historical perspectives. New York: Springer.
58.
WadeN. J. (2007). Image, eye, and retina (invited review). Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 23, 1229–1249.
59.
WadeN. J.TatlerB. W.HellerD. (2003). Dodgeing the issue: Dodge, Javal, Hering, and the measurement of saccades in eye-movement research. Perception, 32, 793–804.
60.
WagnerJ. (1918). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Psychologie des Lesens. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 80, 1–75.
61.
WandellB. A. (1995). Foundations of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
62.
WertheimT. (1894). Über die indirekte Sehschärfe [On indirect visual acuity]. Zeitschrift für Psycholologie & Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 7, 172–187.
63.
WolfeJ. M. (2012). The binding problem lives on: Comment on Di Lollo. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 307–308.
64.
WolfordG. (1975). Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychological Review, 82, 184–199.
65.
WolfordG.HollingsworthS. (1974). Lateral masking in visual information processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 315–320.
