A narrow bar or line (width around 1 arcmin) between two fields of which the luminances are sinusoidally and in counterphase modulated in time appears to make an oscillatory movement. It is possible to annihilate this illusory movement with a real movement and thus to analyze this phenomenon quantitatively. Confirming previous studies, the amount of illusory movement (amplitude typically 10 arcsec) was proportional to the modulation depth of the fields and inversely proportional to the line width and the line contrast. The amount of illusory movement increased with defocus, a lower mean luminance, and eccentricity. The experimental results could be explained by a model that includes a linear low-pass spatial filter. For a Gaussian spatial filter, the standard deviation as derived from the experimental results was 1.1 arcmin (1.0–1.3 arcmin) (median with range of four observers) for well-focused, photopic, foveal viewing. We explored various criteria for line localization in the model (extremes and zero-crossings of Gaussian derivatives).
AllikJ.PulverA. (1995). Magnitude of luminance modulation specifies amplitude of perceived movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 27–34.
2.
AnstisS. M. (1986). Recovering motion information from luminance. Vision Research, 26, 147–160.
3.
AnstisS. M.RogersB. J. (1975). Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast. Vision Research, 15, 957–961.
4.
BakerC. L.BraddickO. J. (1985). Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception. Vision Research, 25, 803–812.
5.
BlommaertF. J.RoufsJ. A. (1981). The foveal point spread function as a determinant for detail vision. Vision Research, 21, 1223–1233.
6.
BraddickO. J. (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research, 14, 519–527.
7.
BraddickO. J. (1980). Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 290, 137–151.
8.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
9.
CampbellF. W.GubischR. W. (1966). Optical quality of the human eye. Journal of Physiology, 186, 558–578.
10.
de LangeH. (1954). Relationship between critical flicker-frequency and a set of low-frequency characteristics of the eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 44, 380–388.
11.
GeorgesonM. A.FreemanT. A. (1997). Perceived locations of bars and edges in one-dimensional images: Computational models and human vision. Vision Research, 37, 127–142.
12.
GeorgesonM. A.MayK. A.FreemanT. A.HesseG. S. (2007). From filters to features: Scale–space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision. Journal of Vision, 7(13):7, 1–21.
13.
GregoryR. L.HeardP. F. (1983). Visual dissociations of movement, position, and stereo depth: Some phenomenal phenomena. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 35, 217–237.
14.
HechtS.VerrijpC. D. (1933). Intermittent stimulation by light III: The relation between intensity and critical fusion frequency for different retinal locations. Journal of General Physiology, 17, 251–268.
15.
HesseG. S.GeorgesonM. A. (2005). Edges and bars: Where do people see features in 1-D images?Vision Research, 45, 507–525.
16.
JansoniusN. M. (1988). Kwantitatieve analyse van illusiebeweging. Doctoral thesis, Department of Biophysics, University of Groningen.
17.
JansoniusN. M.KuiperJ. W. (1989). Quantitative analysis of illusory movement in the human visual system. In ErberJ.MenzelR.PflügerH. J.TodtD. (Eds.), Neural mechanisms of behaviour (p. 202). Stuttgart: Thieme.
18.
KulikowskiJ. J.King-SmithP. E. (1973). Spatial arrangement of line, edge and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. Vision Research, 13, 1455–1478.
19.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J. (1987). Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biological Cybernetics, 55, 367–375.
20.
LarsenA.FarrellJ. E.BundesenC. (1983). Short- and long-range processes in visual apparent movement. Psychological Research, 45, 11–18.
21.
MarrD.HildrethE. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 207, 187–217.
22.
MastebroekH. A.ZaagmanW. H. (1988). Apparent movements induced by luminance modulations: A model study. Perception, 17, 667–679.
23.
McIlhaggaW. H.MayK. A. (2012). Optimal edge filters explain human blur detection. Journal of Vision, 12(10):9, 1–13.
24.
NioY. K.JansoniusN. M.LamersP.MagerA.ZeinstraJ.KooijmanA. C. (2005). Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: A comparison of three different psychophysical methods. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 25, 18–26.
25.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
26.
RobsonJ. G. (1966). Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 56, 1141–1142.
27.
ToetA.SmitC. S.NienhuisB.KoenderinkJ. J. (1988). The visual assessment of the spatial location of a bright bar. Vision Research, 28, 721–737.
28.
van MeeterenA.VosJ. J. (1972). Resolution and contrast sensitivity at low luminances. Vision Research, 12, 825–533.
29.
van NesF. L.BoumanM. A. (1967). Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 401–406.
30.
VeringaF. (1961). Enige natuurkundige aspecten van het zien van gemoduleerd licht. Groningen: V.R.B. Klein.
31.
von BékésyG. (1967). Sensory inhibition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
WattR. J. (1988). Visual processing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
WestheimerG. (1967). Spatial interaction in human cone vision. Journal of Physiology, 190, 139–154.
34.
ZeemanW. P. C.RoelofsC. O. (1953). Some aspects of apparent motion. Acta Psychologica, 9, 159–181.
