Diverse forms of perceptual rivalry are claimed to tap a common causal mechanism. One of the bases for this claim is that the reported dynamics of binocular rivalry and motion-induced blindness are similar on an individual basis (Carter & Pettigrew, 2003 Perception, 32, 295–305). We examined this relationship and found no evidence for a strong correlation. We therefore question the proposition that the dynamics of diverse forms of rivalry are driven by a common mechanism.
AndrewsT. J., & PurvesD. (1997). Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94, 9905–9908
2.
ArnoldD. H. (2011). Why is binocular rivalry uncommon? Discrepant monocular images in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5: 116. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00148
3.
ArnoldD. H.GroveP. M., & WallisT. S. A. (2007). Staying focused: A functional account of perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 7(7): 7, 1–8
4.
ArnoldD. H.JamesB., & RoseboomW. (2009). Binocular rivalry: Spreading dominance through complex images. Journal of Vision, 9(13): 4, 1–9
5.
BargerG. L., & ThornH. C. S. (1949). Evaluation of drought hazard. Agronomy Journal, 41, 519–526
6.
BlakeR. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145–167
7.
BonnehY. S.CoopermanA., & SagiD. (2001). Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature, 411, 798–801
8.
CarterO. L., & PettigrewJ. D. (2003). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?Perception, 32, 295–305
9.
DonnerT. H.SagiD.BonnehY. S., & HeegerD. J. (2008). Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10298–10310
EinhäuserW.StoutJ.KochC., & CarterO. (2008). Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 1704–1709
12.
GrafE. W.AdamsW. J., & LagesM. (2002). Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion. Vision Research, 42, 2731–2735
13.
HsuL. C.YehS. L., & KramerP. (2006). A common mechanism for perceptual filling-in and motion-induced blindness. Vision Research, 46, 1973–1981
14.
KangM. S.HeegerD., & BlakeR. (2009). Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception. Journal of Vision, 9(2): 8, 1–12
15.
KawabeT., & MiuraK. (2007). Subjective disappearance of a target by flickering flankers. Vision Research, 47, 913–918
16.
KovácsI.PapathomasT. V.YangM., & FehérA. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 93, 15508–15511
17.
LeopoldD., & LogothetisN. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254–264
18.
LeveltW. J. (1968). On binocular rivalry (Vol. 2). The Hague: Mouton
19.
LogothetisN. K.LeopoldD. A., & SheinbergD. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?Nature, 380, 621–624
20.
MengM., & TongF. (2004). Can attention bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7): 2, 539–551
21.
MillerS. M.LiuG. B.NgoT. T.HooperG.RiekS.CarsonR. G., & PettigrewJ. D. (2000). Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Current Biology, 10, 383–392
TongF., & EngelS. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195–199
27.
TongF.NakayamaK.VaughenJ. T., & KanwisherN. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759
28.
van BoxtelJ. J. A.AlaisD., & van EeR. (2008a). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision, 8(5): 17, 1–10
29.
van BoxtelJ. J. A.KnapenT.ErkelensC. J., & van EeR. (2008b). Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behaviour for monocular, binocular and stimulus rivalries. Journal of Vision, 8(15): 13, 1–17
30.
van EeR.van DamL., & BrouwerG. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research, 45, 41–55
31.
van LoonA. M.KnapenT.ScholteH. S.St John-SaaltinkE.DonnerT. H., & LammeV. A. (2013). GABA shapes the dynamics of bistable perception. Current Biology, 23, 823–827
32.
WallisT. S. A., & ArnoldD. H. (2008). Motion induced blindness is not tuned to retinal speed. Journal of Vision, 8(2): 11, 1–7
33.
WallisT. S. A., & ArnoldD.H. (2009). Motion-induced blindness and motion streak suppression. Current Biology, 19, 325–329
34.
WatsonT. L.PearsonJ., & CliffordC. W. G. (2004). Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670–1674
