This study investigated the relationships between verbal thinking and performance on visual figure discrimination tasks from a Vygotskian perspective in a large varied adult sample (N = 428). A test designed to assess the structure of word meanings (ie tendency to think in ‘everyday’ or ‘scientific’ concepts as distinguished by Vygotsky) together with two contour picture tasks was presented. Visual tasks were a modified version of Poppelreuter's overlapping figures and a picture depicting a meaningful scene. On both tasks concrete objects and abstract meaningless shapes had to be identified. In addition to relationships between visual task performance and word meaning structure, the effects of the meaningful scene and relations with gender were examined. The results confirmed the expected relation between word meaning structure and visual performance. Furthermore, they suggested a specific effect of the meaningful whole and a male advantage, especially for the first task in which women seemed to benefit less from advanced word meaning structure.
BergmanL REl-KhouriB M, 2002SLEIPNER: A Statistical Package for Pattern-oriented Analyses. Version 2.1Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
2.
BergmanL RMagnussonD, 1997“A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology”Development and Psychopathology9291–319.
3.
BergmanL RMagnussonDEl KhouriB M, 2002Studying Individual Development in an Interindividual Context: A Person-oriented Approach (Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press).
4.
BialystokE, 1992“Attentional control in children's metalinguistic performance and measures of field independence”Developmental Psychology28654–664.
5.
BrianJ ABrysonS E, 1996“Disembedding performance and recognition memory in autism/PDD”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry37865–872.
6.
Della SalaSLaiaconaMTrivelliCSpinnlerH, 1995“Poppelreuter-Ghent's overlapping figures test: Its sensitivity to age, and its clinical use”Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology10511–534.
7.
DicksteinL S, 1968“Field independence in concept attainment”Perceptual & Motor Skills27635–642.
8.
ElkindDKoeglerR RGoE, 1963“Field independence and concept formation”Perceptual & Motor Skills17383–386.
9.
GazzaleyANobreA C, 2012“Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory”Trends in Cognitive Sciences16129–135.
10.
GhentL, 1956“Perception of overlapping and embedded figures by children of different ages”The American Journal of Psychology69575–587.
11.
GottschaldtK, 1926“Über den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren” [About the influence of experience on the perception of figures]Psychologische Forschung8261–317.
12.
GredlerM, 2009“Hiding in plain sight: The stages of mastery/self-regulation in Vygotsky's cultural- historical theory”Educational Psychologist441–19.
13.
HanfmannE, 1941“A study of personal patterns in an intellectual performance”Journal of Personality9315–325.
14.
HuettigFOliversC NHartsuikerR J, 2011“Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms”Acta Psychologica137138–150.
15.
KaufmanS B, 2007“Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity?”Intelligence35211–223.
16.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (London: Lund Humphries).
17.
LefeverM MEhriL C, 1976“The relationship between field independence and sentence disambiguation ability”Journal of Psycholinguistic Research599–106.
18.
LongoniA MPizzamiglioL, 1981“Aspects of verbal processing in relation to perceptual disembedding ability”Journal of Psycholinguistic Research10199–208.
19.
LupyanG, 2012“Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis”Frontiers in Psychology354.
20.
LuriaA R, 1969Vyshije korkovyje funktsii tsheloveka i ikh narushenija pri lokal'nykh porazenijakh mozga [Higher cortical functions in man and their disturbances in local brain lesions] (Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta).
21.
McKennaF P, 1984“Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology47593–603.
22.
MiyakeAWitzkiaA HEmersonM J, 2001“Field dependence-independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test”Memory9445–457.
23.
PoppelreuterW, 1917Die psychischen Schädigungen durch Kopfschuss im Kriege 1914–1916 [The psychic damage resulting from head injury in the war 1914–1916] (Leipzig: Voss).
24.
PostleB R, 2006“Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain”Neuroscience13923–38.
25.
RehermannOBrunB, 1978“Embedded figures test compared with clinical tests of abstraction and memory in intellectual impairment”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology19175–180.
26.
RittschofK A, 2010“Field dependence-independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: Implications for instructional systems design and research”Educational Technology Research and Development5899–114.
27.
SellsRLarnerA J, 2011“The Poppelreuter figure visual perceptual function test for dementia diagnosis”Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry1517–21.
28.
StaszCShavelsonR JCoxD LMooreC A, 1976“Field independence and the structuring of knowledge in a social studies minicourse”Journal of Educational Psychology68550–558.
29.
ToomelaA, 2003a“Development of symbol meaning and the emergence of the semiotically mediated mind”, in Cultural Guidance in the Development of the Human Mind Ed. ToomelaA, (Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing) pp 163–209.
30.
ToomelaA, 2003b“Relationships between personality structure, structure of word meaning, and cognitive ability: A study of cultural mechanisms of personality”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85723–735.
31.
ToomelaA, 2007a“Konkreetsete ja abstraktsete kontuuride jälgimise ülesanne” [Concrete and abstract contour tracing task], in Eesti laste arengu longituuduuringute testikogu Eds ToomelaAKikasE, (Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Psühholoogia Instituut) p C5A.
32.
ToomelaA, 2007b“Situatsiooniline peitepildi ülesanne” [Situational embedded figure task], in Eesti laste arengu longituuduuringute testikogu Eds ToomelaAKikasE, (Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Psühholoogia Instituut) p C5B.
33.
ToomelaA, 2007c“Sõna tähenduse struktuuri test” [Word meaning structure test], in Eesti laste arengu longituuduuringute testikogu Eds ToomelaAKikasE, (Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Psühholoogia Instituut) p C22A.
34.
von EyeABogatA G, 2006“Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development”Merrill-Palmer Quarterly52390–420.
35.
von EyeASpielCWoodP K, 1996“Configural frequency analysis in applied psychological research”Applied Psychology: An International Review45301–352.
36.
VoyerDVoyerSBrydenM P, 1995“Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables”Psychological Bulletin117250–270.
37.
VygotskyL S, 1934/1986Thought and Languagerevised edition (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).
38.
VygotskyL SLuriaA R, 1994“Tool and symbol in child development”, in The Vygotsky Reader Eds van der VeerRValsinerJ, (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 99–174.
39.
WagemansJElderJ HKubovyMPalmerS EPetersonM ASinghMvon der HeydtR, 2012“A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization”Psychological Bulletin1381172–1217.
40.
WitkinH A, 1950“Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures”Journal of Personality191–15.
41.
WitkinH AMooreC AGoodenoughD RCoxP W, 1977“Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications”Review of Educational Research471–64.
