A rotating disk composed of alternating light and dark segments may give rise to the wagon wheel illusion: a perceptual reversal in rotation direction. Continuously illuminated (eg in daylight) as well as discretely presented (eg stroboscopic or computer-animated) versions of the illusion exist; here, we investigated the discrete version. Prominence of the illusion is commonly believed to depend on temporal frequency of rotation, but frequency effects have been unsystematic across previous experiments. Here, illusion strength is shown instead to lawfully depend on an attraction function of angular displacement between successive frames (experiments 1 and 2). We studied the illusion across a wider range of this factor than previously and as a result obtained unusually strong effects (up to 100% reversal). In two further experiments we showed that this is because the effect of the attraction function on the wagon wheel illusion strength is modulated by a perceived increase in the number of spokes of the wheel, a phenomenon generally known as the frequency doubling illusion. These factors combine to offer a unifying explanation of the wagon wheel illusion, at least under discrete presentation and possibly under continuous presentation conditions as well.
AllportD. A. (1968). Phenomenal simultaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 395–406.
2.
AndersonA. J.JohnsonC. A. (2002). Effect of spatial waveform on apparent spatial frequency. Vision Research, 42, 725–732.
3.
BarlowH. B.HillR. M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall illusion. Nature, 200, 1345–1347.
4.
DemirelS.VingrysA. J.AndersonA. J.JohnsonC. (1999). Spatiotemporal properties of the frequency doubling effect. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 40, 42.
5.
EaglemanD. M. (2001). Visual illusions and neurobiology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 920–926.
6.
FinlayD. J.DodwellP. C.CaelliT. M. (1984). The wagon-wheel effect. Perception, 13, 237–248.
7.
GeisslerH. G.ScheberaF. U.KompassR. (1999). Ultra-precise quantal timing: Evidence from simultaneity thresholds in long-range apparent movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 707–726.
8.
GepshteinS.KubovyM. (2007). The lawful perception of apparent motion. Journal of Vision, 7(8):9, 1–15.
9.
GiaschiD.DouglasR.MarlinS.CynaderM. (1993). The time course of direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2024–2034.
10.
HawkenM. J.ShapleyR. M.GrosofD. H. (1996). Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 13, 477–492.
KellyD. (1966). Frequency doubling in visual responses. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 56, 1628–1633.
13.
KellyD. H. (1979). Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1340–1349.
14.
KlineK. A.EaglemanD. M. (2008). Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal. Journal of Vision, 8(4):13, 1–5.
15.
KlineK. A.HolcombeA. O.EaglemanD. M. (2004). Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field. Vision Research, 44, 2653–2658.
16.
KubovyM.van den BergM. (2008). The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: A probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns. Psychological Review, 115, 131–154.
17.
KubovyM.WagemansJ. (1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychological Science, 6, 225–234.
18.
KulikowskiJ. J. (1971). Effect of eye movements on the contrast sensitivity of spatiotemporal patterns. Vision Research, 11, 261–273.
19.
KulikowskiJ. J. (1975). Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: Balance between movement and pattern channels. Vision Research, 15, 673–680.
20.
LorenceauJ. (1987). Recovery from contrast adaptation: Effects of spatial and temporal frequency. Vision Research, 27, 2185–2191.
21.
MaddessT.KulikowskiJ. J. (1999). Apparent fineness of stationary compound gratings. Vision Research, 39, 3404–3416.
22.
MatherG.PavanA.CampanaG.CascoC. (2008). The motion after-effect reloaded. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 481–487.
23.
McKendrickA. M.AndersonA. J.JohnsonC. A.FortuneB. (2003). Appearance of the frequency doubling stimulus in normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 44, 1111–1116.
24.
MethaA. B.VingrysA. J.BadcockD. R. (1993). Calibration of a color monitor for visual psychophysics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 371–383.
PakarianP.YasamyM. T. (2003). Wagon-wheel illusion under steady illumination: Real or illusory?Perception, 32, 1307–1310.
27.
PalmerS. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
PantleA. (1974). Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers. Vision Research, 14, 1229–1236.
29.
ParkerA. (1981). Shifts in perceived periodicity induced by temporal modulation and their influence on the spatial frequency tuning of two aftereffects. Vision Research, 21, 1739–1747.
30.
ParkerA. (1983). The effects of temporal modulation on the perceived spatial structure of sine-wave gratings. Perception, 12, 663–682.
31.
PavanA.SkujevskisM. (2013). The role of stationary and dynamic test patterns in rapid forms of motion after-effect. Journal of Vision, 13(1):10, 1–17.
32.
PurvesD.PaydarfarJ. A.AndrewsT. J. (1996). The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 93, 3693–3697.
33.
RichardsW.FeltonT. B. (1973). Spatial frequency doubling: Retinal or central?Vision Research, 13, 2129–2137.
34.
SchoutenJ. F. (1967). Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In Wathen-DunnI. (Ed.), Models for the perception of speech and visual form (pp. 44–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
ShepardR. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
36.
SimpsonW. A.ShahaniU.ManahilovV, (2004). Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling. Neuroscience Letters, 375, 23–27.
37.
SrinivasanM. V.DvorakD. R. (1979). The waterfall illusion in an insect visual system. Vision Research, 19, 1435–1437.
38.
ToliasA. S.SmirnakisS. M.AugathM. A.TrinathT.LogothetisN. K. (2001). Motion processing in the macaque: Revisited with functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8594–8601.
39.
UllmanS. (1981). Analysis ofvisual motion by biological and computer systems. Computer, 14, 57–69.
40.
VallamK. (2006). Psychophysical explorations of the illusion underpinning frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
41.
VanRullenR. (2006). The continuous wagon wheel illusion is object-based. Vision Research, 46, 4091–4095.
42.
VanRullenR. (2007). The continuous wagon wheel illusion depends on, but is not identical to, neuronal adaptation. Vision Research, 47, 2143–2149.
43.
VanRullenR.KochC. (2003). Is perception discrete or continuous?Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 207–213.
44.
VanRullenR.Pascual-LeoneA.BattelliL. (2008). The continuous wagon wheel illusion and the ‘when’ pathway of the right parietal lobe: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. PLoS ONE, 3, e2911.
45.
VanRullenR.ReddyL.KochC. (2005). Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 5291–5296.
46.
VanRullenR.ReddyL.KochC. (2006). The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 502–507.
47.
VerstratenF. A. J. (1996). On the ancient history of the direction of the motion aftereffect. Perception, 25, 1177–1188.
48.
VerstratenF. A. J.van der SmagtM. J.van de GrindW. A. (1998). Aftereffect of high-speed motion. Perception, 27, 1055–1066.
49.
WatanabeA.MoriT.NagataS.HiwatashiK. (1968). Spatial sine-wave responses of the human visual system. Vision Research, 8, 1245–1263.
50.
WatsonA. B. (1990). Optimal displacement in apparent motion and quadrature models of motion sensing. Vision Research, 30, 1389–1393.
51.
WatsonA. B.AlbertJ.AhumadaJ.FarrellJ. E. (1985). Window of visibility: A psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual motion displays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3, 300–307.
