We investigated recognition of blurry faces and whether viewing size affects identification of such severely degraded images. Despite the common belief that face perception relies on middle spatial frequencies, the critical spatial frequency band for face recognition is not fixed but rather depends on size. This is especially pronounced at small sizes, where observers choose to utilize lower, rather than middle, frequencies to identify a face. Here we assessed recognition of identity via a novel use of the face adaptation paradigm. We examined face identity aftereffects of blurry and intact adaptors at two sizes. Intact adaptors induced significant aftereffects regardless of size. Small, but not large, blurry adaptors produced aftereffects despite the fact that both contained exactly the same level of facial detail. This suggests an inability to utilize low-frequency information for perceiving identity in large faces. We conclude that (1) size is a key factor in human face recognition processes and (2) coarse facial images are better recognized at small sizes.
BentonC. P.EtchellsP. J.PorterG.ClarkA. P.Penton-VoakI. S.NikolovS. G. (2007). Turning the other cheek: The viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1622), 2131–2137.
2.
BentonC. P.JenningsS. J.ChattingD. J. (2006). Viewpoint dependence in adaptation to facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 3313–3325.
3.
BurtonA. M.WilsonS.CowanM.BruceV, (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243–248.
4.
ChungS. T. L.LeggeG. E.TjanB. S. (2002). Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 42, 2137–2152.
5.
CostenN.ParkerD.CrawI. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 602–612.
6.
FiorentiniA.MaffeiL.SandiniG. (1983). The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception. Perception, 12, 195–201.
7.
FoxC. J.OrucI.BartonJ. J. (2008). It doesn't matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. Journal of Vision, 8(3):11, 11–13.
8.
GasparC.SekulerA. B.BennettP. J. (2008). Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Vision Research, 48, 2817–2826.
9.
GoffauxVvan ZonJ.SchiltzC. (2011). The horizontal tuning of face perception relies on the processing of intermediate and high spatial frequencies. Journal of Vision, 11(10):1, 1–9.
10.
GoldJ.BennettP. J.SekulerA. B. (1999). Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers. Vision Research, 39, 3537–3560.
11.
HarmonL. D. (1973). The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 229(5), 71–82.
12.
HayesT.MorroneM. C.BurrD. C. (1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass- filtered images. Perception, 15, 595–602.
13.
JenkinsR.BeaverJ. D.CalderA. J. (2006). I thought you were looking at me: Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science, 17, 506–513.
14.
JiangF.BlanzVO'TooleA. J. (2006). Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science, 17, 493–500.
LoftusG. R.HarleyE. M. (2005). Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 43–65.
17.
LundqvistD.LittonJ. E. (1998). The Averaged Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (AKDEF). (Material developed in 1998 at Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute! Stockholm.)
18.
MajajN. J.PelliD. G.KurshanP.PalomaresM. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165–1184.
19.
NäsänenR. (1999). Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vision Research, 39, 3824–3833.
20.
OrugI.BartonJ. J. (2010a). Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: Evidence for limited scale invariance for faces. Journal of Vision, 10(12):20, 1–12.
21.
OrugI.BartonJ. J. (2010b). A novel face aftereffect based on recognition contrast thresholds. Vision Research, 50, 1845–1854.
22.
OruçI.LandyM. S. (2009). Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification. Journal of Vision, 9(9):4, 1–19.
23.
ParkerD. M.CostenN. P. (1999). One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing. Current Psychology, 18, 118–127.
24.
RubinG.SiegelK. (1984). Recognition of low-pass faces and letters. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 30, 96.
25.
SchynsP. G.BonnarL.GosselinF. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402–409.
26.
SinhaP. (2002a). Identifying perceptually significant features for recognizing faces. Proc. SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VII, 4662, 12–21, doi:10.1117/12.469529.
SmithF. W.SchynsP. G. (2009). Smile through your fear and sadness: Transmitting and identifying facial expression signals over a range of viewing distances. Psychological Science, 20, 1202–1208.
WillenbockelVFisetD.ChauvinA.BlaisC.ArguinM.TanakaJ. W., (2010). Does face inversion change spatial frequency tuning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 122–135.
31.
YipA. W.SinhaP. (2002). Contribution of color to face recognition. Perception, 31, 995–1003.
