Certain phenomenological difficulties for the depth-processing/size-scaling theory of the Ponzo illusion can be resolved if those theoretical activities are carried out in Milner and Goodale's proposed vision-for-action cortical pathway.
BrennerESmeetsJ B J, 1996“Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object”Experimental Brain Research111473–476
2.
CorenSGirgusJ S, 1977“Illusions and constancies”, in Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception Ed. EpsteinW, (New York: John Wiley) p. 261
3.
FranzV HFahleMBülthoffH HGegenfurtnerK R, 2001“Effects of visual illusions on grasping”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance271124–1144
GregoryR L, 1966Eye and Brain (New York: World University Press) pp 150–151
6.
JacksonS RShawA, 2000“The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26418–423
7.
KennedyJ MOstryD J, 1976“Approaches to picture perception: Perceptual experience and ecological optics”Canadian Journal of Psychology3090–98
8.
MilnerA DGoodaleM A, 1995The Visual Brain in Action (New York: Oxford University Press)
9.
ParksT, 2001“The mirror- (and the moon-) illusion”Perception30899
10.
ParksT, in press, “Visual-illusion distance paradoxes: A resolution”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
11.
PrinzmetalWShimamuraA PMikolinskiM, 2001“The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation”Perception & Psychophysics6399–114
12.
RockI, 1984Perception (New York: W H Freeman) p. 157
13.
ServosP, 2006“Preservation of Emmert's law in a visual form agnosic”Neurocase12122–126
