It has been reported that people tend to preferentially associate phonemes like /m/, /l/, /n/ to curvilinear shapes and phonemes like /t/, /z/, /r/, /k/ to rectilinear shapes. Here we evaluated the performance of children/adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and neurotypical controls in this audiovisual congruency phenomenon. Pairs of visual patterns (curvilinear vs rectilinear) were presented to a group of ASD participants (low- or high-functioning) and a group of age-matched neurotypical controls. Participants were asked to associate each item to non-meaningful phoneme clusters. ASD participants showed a lower proportion of expected association responses than the controls. Within the ASD group the performance varied as a function of the severity of the symptomatology. These data suggest that children/adolescents with ASD show, although at different degrees as a function of the severity of the ASD, lower phonetic-iconic congruency response patterns than neurotypical controls, pointing to poorer multisensory integration capabilities.
American Psychiatric Association, 2000Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association)
2.
AveyardM E, 2012“Some consonants sound curvy: Effects of sound symbolism on object recognition”Memory & Cognition4083–92
3.
BebkoJ MWeissJ ADemarkJ LGomezP, 2006“Discrimination of temporal synchrony in intermodal events by children with autism and children with developmental disabilities without autism”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry4788–98
4.
Ben-ArtziEMarksL E, 1995“Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference”Perception & Psychophysics571151–1162
5.
ChurchB AKraussM SLopataCToomeyJ AThomeerM LCoutinhoM VVolkerM AMercadoE, 2010“Atypical categorization in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review17862–868
6.
CiesielskiK TKnightJ EPrinceR JHarrisR JHandmakerS D, 1995“Event-related potentials in cross-modal divided attention in autism”Neuropsychologia33225–246
7.
KadoshR CohenHenikAWalshV, 2007“Small is bright and big is dark in synaesthesia”Current Biology17R834–R835
8.
CollignonOCharbonneauGPetersFNassimMLassondeMLeporeFMottronLBertoneA, in press “Reduced multisensory facilitation in persons with autism”Cortex
9.
CourchesneETownsendJAkshoomoffN ASaitohOYeung-CourchesneRLincolnA JJamesH EHaasR HSchreibmanLLauL, 1994“Impairment in shifting attention in autistic and cerebellar patients”Behavioral Neuroscience108848–865
10.
FarranE KBrosnanM J, 2011“Perceptual grouping abilities in individuals with autism spectrum disorder; exploring patterns of ability in relation to grouping type and levels of development”Autism Research4283–292
FrithU, 1989Autism: Explaining the Enigma (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)
13.
GallaceASpenceC, 2006“Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size”Perception & Psychophysics681191–1203
14.
GarnerW R, 1977“The effect of absolute size on the separability of the dimensions of size and brightness”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society9380–382
15.
GrinterE JMayberyM TPellicanoEBadcockJ CBadcockD R, 2010“Perception of shapes targeting local and global processes in autism spectrum disorders”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry51717–724
16.
HollandM KWertheimerM, 1964“Some physiognomic aspects of naming or ‘maluma’ and ‘takete’ revisited”Perceptual & Motor Skills19111–117
17.
IarocciGMcDonaldJ, 2006“Sensory integration and the perceptual experience”Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders3677–90
18.
JolicoeurPBesnerD, 1987“Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the comparison of size-discrepant shapes”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13478–487
19.
KlingerL GDawsonG, 2001“Prototype formation in autism”Developmental Psychopathology13111–124
20.
KöhlerW, 1929“Gestalt Psychology (New York: Liveright) [Italian translation, 1961 La Psicologia della Gestalt (Milan: Feltrinelli)]
21.
LewkowiczD JTurkewitzG, 1980“Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching”Developmental Psychology16597–607
MarksL E, 1974“On associations of light and sound: The mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness”American Journal of Psychology87173–188
24.
MarksL E, 1983“Similarities and differences among the senses”International Journal of Neuroscience191–11
25.
MarksL E, 1987“On cross-modal similarity: Auditory–visual interactions in speeded discrimination”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13384–394
26.
MarksL EHammealR JBornsteinM H, 1987“Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor”Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development521–102
27.
MartinoGMarksL E, 1999“Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: Tests of the semantic coding hypothesis”Perception28903–923
28.
MaurerDPathmanTMondlochC J, 2006“The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults”Developmental Science9316–322
29.
MelaraR D, 1989“Similarity relations among synesthetic stimuli and their attributes”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15212–231
30.
MelaraR DMarksL E, 1990“Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions”Memory & Cognition18477–495
31.
MelaraR DO'BrienT P, 1987“Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General116323–336
32.
MondlochC JMaurerD, 2004“Do small white balls squeak? Pitch-object correspondences in young children”Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience4133–136
33.
NewmanS, 1933“Further experiments in phonetic symbolism”American Journal of Psychology4553–75
34.
NielsenARendallD, 2011“The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete–Maluma phenomenon”Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology65115–124
35.
ObermanL MRamachandranV S, 2008“Preliminary evidence for deficits in multisensory integration in autism spectrum disorders: The mirror neuron hypothesis”Social Neuroscience3348–355
36.
O'BoyleM WMillerD ARahmaniF J, 1987“Sound-meaning relationships in speakers of Urdu and English: Evidence for a cross-cultural phonetic symbolism”Journal of Psycholinguistic Research16273–288
37.
PlaistedKSaksidaLAlcántaraJWeisblattE, 2003“Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of weak central coherence effects: Experiments in visual configural learning and auditory perception”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B358375–386
38.
RamachandranV SHubbardE M, 2001“Synaesthesia—A window into perception, thought and language”Journal of Consciousness Studies83–34
39.
RamachandranV SHubbardE M, 2003“Hearing colors, tasting shapes”Scientific American288(5) 43–49
40.
RogersS JOzonoffS, 2005“Annotation: What do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism? A critical review of the empirical evidence”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry461255–1268
41.
SapirE, 1929“A study in phonetic symbolism”Journal of Experimental Psychology12225–239
42.
SchaafRBlancheE I, 2011“Comparison of behavioral intervention and sensory-integration therapy in the treatment of challenging behavior”Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders411436–1438
43.
ShulmanCYirmiyaNGreenbaumC W, 1995“From categorization to classification: A comparison among individuals with autism, mental retardation, and normal development”Journal of Abnormal Psychology104601–609
44.
SoulièresIMottronLSaumierDLarochelleS, 2007“Atypical categorical perception in autism: Autonomy of discrimination?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37481–490
45.
SpenceC, 2011“Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics73971–995
46.
TayaSMiuraK, 2007“Shrinkage in the apparent size of cylindrical objects”Perception363–16
47.
ThompsonP DEstesZ, 2011“Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology642392–2404
48.
WalkerR, 1987“The effects of culture, environment, age, and musical training on choices of visual metaphors for sound”Perception & Psychophysics42491–502
49.
WestburyC, 2005“Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task”Brain Language9310–19
