Fluctuating asymmetry and averageness is correlated with our perception of beauty in human faces. Yet, whether deviations of centrality in the positioning of the eyes, the nose, and the mouth have different effects on our perception of asymmetry in a holistic human face, is still uncertain. In this study we aimed to test the relative effect of decentralising the horizontal position of three sets of paired dots representing eyes, nostrils, or mouth from the vertical midline of ambiguous dot figures, vaguely resembling a face. The figures were ranked according to perceived asymmetry by human observers. When associating the figures with non-facial objects (eg a butterfly), none of the figures' rank distribution differed from each other. However, when observers imagined the figures to represent a human face, the figure with the decentralised pair of dots representing the nostrils was significantly ranked as more asymmetric than the other figures. This result provides indications that the brain may deal with information about facial asymmetry and averageness heavily depending on the centrality of the nasal region.
BabuccuOLatifogluOAtabayKOralNCosanB, 2003“Sociological aspects of rhinoplasty”Aesthetic Plastic Surgery2744–49
2.
BindemannMScheepersCBurtonA M, 2009“Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces”Journal of Vision9(2):7, 1–16
3.
BrinkOVesterbyAJensenJ, 1998“Pattern of injuries due to interpersonal violence”Injury—International Journal of the Care of the Injured29705–709
4.
BruceV GMorganM J, 1975“Violations of symmetry and repetition in visual-patterns”Perception4239–249
5.
BurtonA MBruceVDenchN, 1993“What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement”Perception22153–176
6.
ChelnokovaOLaengB, 2011“Three-dimensional information in face recognition: An eye-tracking study”Journal of Vision11(13):27, 1–15
7.
EvansC SWenderothPChengK, 2000“Detection of bilateral symmetry in complex biological images”Perception2931–42
8.
FindlayJ M, 1982“Global visual processing for saccadic eye-movements”Vision Research221033–1045
9.
GenecovJ SSinclairP MDechowP C, 1990“Development of the nose and soft-tissue profile”Angle Orthodontist60191–198
10.
HaithM M, 1977“Eye contact and face scanning in early infancy”Science198853–855
11.
HassonO, 1989“Amplifiers and the handicap principle in sexual selection—a different emphasis”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series, B235383–406
12.
HassonO, 1991“Sexual displays as amplifiers—practical examples with an emphasis on feather decorations”Behavioral Ecology2189–197
13.
HassonUHendlerTBen BashatDMalachR, 2001“Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience13744–753
14.
HaywardA F, 1983“Handbook of facial growth”Journal of Dentistry11182–183
15.
HendersonJ MWilliamsC CFalkR J, 2005“Eye movements are functional during face learning”Memory & Cognition3398–106
16.
HsiaoJ H WCottrellG, 2008“Two fixations suffice in face recognition”Psychological Science19998–1006
17.
HussainKWijetungeD BGrubnicSJacksonI T, 1994“A comprehensive analysis of craniofacial trauma”Journal of Trauma-Injury, Infection & Critical Care3634–47
18.
ISAPS Biennial Global Survey, 2010International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) Biennial Global Survey (10), available at http//www.isaps.org/
19.
IshaiAUngerleiderL GHaxbyJ V, 2000“Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images”Neuron28979–990
20.
KaufmanLRichardsW, 1969“Spontaneous fixation tendencies for visual forms”Perception & Psychophysics585–88
21.
LessaAde SouzaS M F M, 2006“Broken noses for the gods: Ritual battles in the Atacama Desert during the Tiwanaku period”Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz101133–138
22.
LiJLiuJLiangJZhangHZhaoJRiethC AHuberD ELiWShiGAiLTianJLeeK, 2010“Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top – down face processing: A Dynamic Causal Modeling Study”Brain Research134040–51
23.
LiuC HWardJYoungA W, 2006“Transfer between two- and three-dimensional representations of faces”Visual Cognition1351–64
24.
LudwigW, 1932Das Rechts-Links Problem im Tierreich und beim Menschen: Mit einem Anhang, Rechts-Links-Merkmale der Pflanzen (Berlin: Springer)
25.
McGowanJ WKowlerESharmaAChubbC, 1998“Saccadic localization of random dot targets”Vision Research38895–909
26.
MechelliAPriceC JFristonK JIshaiA, 2004“Where bottom-up meets top-down: Neuronal interactions during perception and imagery”Cerebral Cortex141256–1265
27.
MelcherDKowlerE, 1999“Shapes, surfaces and saccades”Vision Research392929–2946
28.
MertensISiegmundHGrusserO J, 1993“Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task”Neuropsychologia31989–998
29.
Meyer-MarcottyPStellzig-EisenhauerABareisUHartmannJKochelJ, 2011“Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry”European Journal of Orthodontics33647–653
30.
Mikalsen ÅK RFolstadILaengBYoccozN G, unpublished “The spectacular human nose: An amplifier of individual quality”
31.
MøllerA PThornhillR, 1998“Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta-analysis”American Naturalist151174–192
32.
OinonenK AMamanianD, 2007“Facial symmetry detection ability changes across the menstrual cycle”Biological Psychology75136–145
33.
PalmerA RStrobeckC, 1986“Fluctuating asymmetry—measurement, analysis, patterns”Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics17391–421
34.
PalmerS EHemenwayK, 1978“Orientation and symmetry—effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4691–702
35.
PinheiroJBatesDDebRoySSarkarD, R Development Core Team, 2012nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models (Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing)
36.
Development Core TeamR, 2011R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing)
37.
RheeS CKimY KChaJ HKangS RParkH S, 2004“Septal fracture in simple nasal bone fracture”Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery11345–52
38.
RotheH, 2002“Primate sexuality. Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings”HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology5382–82
39.
SaetherLVan BelleWLaengBBrennenTOvervollM, 2009“Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: Evidence from eye-tracking data”Vision Research492870–2880
40.
SasakiYVanduffelWKnutsenTTylerCTootellR, 2005“Symmetry activates extrastriate visual cortex in human and nonhuman primates”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA1023159–3163
41.
SayginZ MOsherD EKoldewynKReynoldsGGabrieliJ D ESaxeR R, 2012“Anatomical connectivity patterns predict face selectivity in the fusiform gyrus”Nature Neuroscience15321–327
42.
SchwarzerGHuberSDummlerT, 2005“Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing”Memory & Cognition33344–354
43.
SchynsP GBonnarLGosselinF, 2002“Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information”Psychological Science13402–409
44.
ShackelfordT KLarsenR J, 1997“Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72456–466
45.
ThornhillRGangestadS W, 1994“Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior”Psychological Science5297–302
46.
VinetteCGosselinFSchynsP G, 2004“Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: It's in the eyes”Cognitive Science28289–301
47.
VishwanathDKowlerE, 2004“Saccadic localization in the presence of cues to three-dimensional shape”Journal of Vision4445–458
48.
ZaidelD WChenA CGermanC, 1995“She is not a beauty even when she smiles—possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric-specialization”Neuropsychologia33649–655
