David Marr's approach to the study of vision has been tremendously influential. However, the approach proposes the goal of computing invariant shape descriptions from image-based information, a task that appears implausible, given the tremendous variation that can occur between images displaying a single object. Theorists in the field of three-dimensional object recognition have rejected the approach of computing object-centered representations, and instead propose representations of objects from the perspective of a viewer. If object-centered descriptions of objects exist in the brain, they are more likely to underlie motor interaction with objects rather than visual object understanding.
BarenholtzETarrM J, 2007“Reconsidering the role of structure in vision”The Psychology of Learning and Motivation47157–180
2.
BarenholtzETarrM J, 2011“Visual learning of statistical relations among non-adjacent features: Evidence for structural encoding”Visual Cognition19469–482
3.
BiedermanI, 1985“Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory”Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing3229–73
4.
BiedermanI, 2001“Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory”Spatial Vision13241–253
5.
BiedermanIBarM, 1999“One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects”Vision Research392885–2899
6.
BiedermanIGerhardsteinP C, 1995“Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff'”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance211506–1514
7.
BlumH, 1973“Biological shape and visual science (part i)”Journal of Theoretical Biology38205–287
8.
BülthoffH HEdelmanS, 1992“Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA8960–64
9.
CheungO SHaywardW GGauthierI, 2009“Dissociating the effects of angular disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition”Cognition113128–133
10.
CheungO SHaywardW GGauthierI, 2008“Dissociating the effects of viewpoint disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition”, paper presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL, USA
11.
CorballisM C, 1988“Recognition of disoriented objects”Psychological Review95115–123
12.
CrouzetS MSerreT, 2011“What are the visual features underlying object recognition?”Frontiers in Psychology2(326) 1–15
13.
Davies-ThompsonJGouwsAAndrewsT J, 2009“An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream”Neuropsychologia471627–1635
14.
FeldmanJSinghM, 2006“Bayesian estimation of the shape skeleton”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA10318014–18019
15.
FujitaITanakaKItoMChengK, 1992“Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex”Nature360343–346
16.
GauthierIHaywardW GTarrM JAndersonA WSkudlarskiPGoreJ C, 2002“BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition”Neuron34161–171
17.
GibsonJ J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
18.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
HaywardW G, 2003“After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?”Trends in Cognitive Sciences7425–427
21.
HaywardW GTarrM J, 2005“High-level vision”, in The Handbook of Cognition Eds LambertsKGoldstoneR L, (London: Sage) pp 48–70
22.
HaywardW GZhouGGauthierIHarrisI, 2006“Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13820–825
23.
HummelJ E, 2001“Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition”Visual Cognition8489–517
24.
HummelJ EBiedermanI, 1992“Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition”Psychological Review99480–517
25.
HummelJ EStankiewiczB J, 1988“Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny”Visual Cognition549–79
McCloskeyM, 2009Visual Reflections: A Perceptual Deficit and its Implications (New York: Oxford University Press)
28.
MarrD, 1982Vision (New York: W H Freeman)
29.
MarrDNishiharaH K, 1978“Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B200269–294
30.
PerrettD IOramM WHarriesMBevanRHietanenJBensonPThomasS, 1991“Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex”Experimental Brain Research86159–173
31.
PerrettD ISmithP A JPotterD DMistlinA JHeadA SMilnerA DJeevesM A, 1985“Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B223293–317
32.
RiesenhuberMPoggioT, 1999“Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex”Nature Neuroscience21019–1025
33.
RoschEMervisC BGrayW DJohnsonD MBoyes-BraemP, 1976“Basic objects in natural categories”Cognitive Psychology8382–439
34.
SerreTKouhMCadieuCKnoblichUKreimanGPoggioT, 2005“A theory of object recognition: Computations and circuits in the feedforward path of the ventral stream in primate visual cortex”, CBCL paper #259/AI Memo #2005–036, MIT, Cambridge, MA
35.
ShepardR NMetzlerJ, 1971“Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects”Science171701–703
36.
TanakaKSaitoHFukadaYMoriyaM, 1991“Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey”Journal of Neurophysiology66170–189
37.
TarrM J, 1995“Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review255–82
38.
TarrM JBülthoffH H, 1995“Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993)”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance211494–1505
39.
TarrM JKriegmanD J, 2001“What defines a view?”Vision Research411981–2004
40.
ThomaVDavidoffJHummelJ E, 2007“Priming of plane-rotated objects depends on attention and view familiarity”Visual Cognition15179–210
41.
UllmanSVidal-NaquetMSaliE, 2002“Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification”Nature Neuroscience5682–687
42.
UngerleiderL GMishkin, 1982“Two cortical visual systems”, in Analyses of Visual Behavior Eds IngleD JGoodaleM AMansfieldR J W, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 549–586
43.
WangGTanifujiMTanakaK, 1998“Functional architecture in monkey inferotemporal cortex revealed by in vivo optical imaging”Neuroscience Research3233–46
