ChangA Y CTzengO J LHungD LWuD H, 2011“Big time is not always long: Numerical magnitude automatically affects time reproduction”Psychological Science221567–1573
2.
DaarMPrattJ, 2008“Digits affect actions: The SNARC effect and response selection”Cortex4400–405
3.
DormalVSeronXPesentiM, 2006“Numerosity-duration interference: A Stroop experiment”Acta Psychologica121109–124
4.
FinkG RMarshallCWeissHShahN JToniIHalliganP WZillesK, 2000“‘Where’ depends on ‘what’: A differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one- versus two-dimensions”Neuropsychologia381741–1748
5.
GrassiMBonatoM, 2012“The interaction between time and number in a temporal bisection task: A reply to Vicario (2011)”Perception41498–500
6.
LuAHodgesBZhangJZhangJ X, 2009“Contextual effects on number-time interaction”Cognition113117–122
7.
MilnerA DBrechmannMPagliariniL, 1992“To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects”Neuropsychologia30515–526
8.
OliveriMVicarioC MSalernoSKochGTurrizianiPManganoRChillemiGCaltagironeC, 2008“Perceiving numbers alters time perception”Neuroscience Letters438308–311
9.
VicarioC M, 2011“Perceiving numbers affects the subjective temporal midpoint”Perception4023–29
10.
VicarioC M, 2012“Perceiving numbers affects the internal random movements generator”The Scientific World Journal ID 347068, http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/347068
11.
VicarioC MPecoraroPTurrizianiPKochGCaltagironeCOliveriM, 2008“Relativistic compression and expansion of experiential time in the left and right space”PLoS ONE3e1716, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001716
12.
XuanBZhangDHeSChenX, 2007“Larger stimuli are judged to last longer”Journal of Vision7(10):2, 1–5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/7.10.2
