Marr, Gibson, and the Gestalt school all offered different views on visual perception. In some cases, these views agree; in others they differ. Can a computational approach assimilate these different perspectives to yield one inclusive framework for vision?
HelmholtzH L F, 1910Treatise on Physiological Optics translated by SouthallJ P C, for the Optical Society of America, 1925 (New York: Dover, 1962)
4.
KoenderinkJ Jvan DoornA J, 1976“Local structure of movement parallax of the plane”Journal of the Optical Society of America66717–723
5.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace)
6.
MacKayD M, 1969Information, Mechanism, and Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pages 22, 70
7.
MarrD, 1976“Early processing of visual information”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B275483–524
8.
MarrDNishiharaH K, 1978“Visual information processing: Artificial intelligence and the sensorium of sight”Technology Review812–23
9.
UllmanS, 1995“Sequence-seeking and counter streams: A computational model for bi-directional information flow in the visual cortex”Cerebral Cortex51–11
10.
WertheimerM, 1938Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms (London: Harcourt, Brace)
