This essay reflects on the revolution David Marr brought about in vision research, and in cognitive science more broadly. I start with an insider's view, then examine the methodological impact of his framework in cognitive science in general. My group's work on sketch understanding descends from Marr's approach to vision, a connection which I make to provide a concrete illustration. I close with a few thoughts about how research in vision and other areas of cognitive science might come together in the future.
AndersonJ, 2007How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
2.
DehaeneSIzardVPicaPSpelkeE, 2006“Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group”Science311381–384
3.
DonlonJ JForbusK D, 1999“Using a geographic information system for qualitative spatial reasoning about trafficability”, Proceedings of the Qualitative Reasoning Workshop, Loch Awe, Scotland
4.
EvansT, 1968“A program for the solution of geometric-analogy intelligence test questions”, in Semantic Information Processing Ed. MinskyM, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 271–353
5.
FalkenhainerBForbusK DGentnerD, 1989“The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples”Artificial Intelligence411–63
6.
FerrucciD, and the Watson Team, 2012“This is Watson”Special issue of the IBM Journal of Research and Development56 (3, 4)
7.
ForbusK, 2010“AI and cognitive science: The past and next 30 years”Topics in Cognitive Science2345–356
8.
ForbusKGentnerD, 1997“Qualitative mental models: Simulations or memories?”, inProceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Cortona, Italy
9.
ForbusKKlenkMHinrichsT, 2009“Companion cognitive systems: Design goals and lessons learned so far”IEEE Intelligent Systems24(4) 36–46
10.
ForbusKUsherJLovettALockwoodKWetzelJ, 2011“CogSketch: Sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education”Topics in Cognitive Science3648–666
11.
FordKHayesP, 1998“On computational wings: Rethinking the goals of artificial intelligence”Scientific American9(4) 78–83
12.
FriedmanSForbusK, 2010“An integrated systems approach to explanation-based conceptual change”Proceedings of AAAI-10, Atlanta, GA (Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press)
13.
GentnerD, 1983, “Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy”Cognitive Science7155–170
14.
GentnerD, 2010“Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems”Cognitive Science34752–775
15.
GentnerDForbusK, 2011“Computational models of analogy”Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science2266–276
16.
HummelJ EHolyoakK J, 2003“A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization”Psychological Review110220–264
17.
LairdJ, 2012The Soar Cognitive Architecture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
18.
LockwoodKForbusK, 2009“Multimodal knowledge capture from text and diagrams”Proceedings of KCAP-2009 (Redondo Beach, CA: ACM)
19.
LockwoodKLovettAForbusK, 2008“Automatic classification of containment and support spatial relations in English and Dutch”, in Spatial Cognition VI: Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space. Proceedings of Spatial Cognition Eds FreksaCNewcombeNGärdenforsPWölflS, (Freiburg: Springer)
20.
LovettAForbusK, 2011“Cultural commonalities and differences in spatial problem solving: A computational analysis”Cognition121281–287
21.
LovettAGentnerDForbusKSagiE, 2009b“Using analogical mapping to simulate time-course phenomena in perceptual similarity”Cognitive Systems Research10216–228
22.
LovettATomaiEForbusKUsherJ, 2009a“Solving geometric analogy problems through two-stage analogical mapping”Cognitive Science331192–1231
23.
NewellASimonH, 1972Human Problem Solving (New York: Prentice-Hall)
24.
SagiEGentnerDLovettA, 2012“What difference reveals about similarity”Cognitive Science doi:10.1111/j.1551–6709.2012.01250.x
25.
TenenbaumJ BKempCGriffithsT LGoodmanN D, 2011“How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction”Science3311279–1285
26.
WetzelJForbusK, 2009“Automated critique of sketched mechanisms”, in Proceedings of the 21st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Pasadena, CA (Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press)
27.
WolffPGentnerD, 2011“Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension”Cognitive Science351456–1448
28.
YinPForbusKUsherJSagemanBJeeB, 2010“Sketch worksheets: A sketch-based educational software system”, in Proceedings of the 22nd Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Atlanta, GA (Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press)
29.
YipKZhaoF, 1996“Spatial aggregation: Theory and applications”Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research51–26