Ambiguous figures were primed with picture context, movement, and by presentation of a prior ambiguous figure. We tested two mammal/bird figures to determine if the multiple primes would add or interfere. Picture priming was effective for both figures but diminished with the presentation of a prior ambiguous figure. For the ‘swan/squirrel’ there was little movement priming. However, ‘rabbit/duck’ showed strong movement priming which cancelled the reducing effect of prior presentation and added to the picture effect.
BernsteinL JCooperL A, 1997“Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23721–737
2.
BruggerP, 1999“One hundred years of an ambiguous figure: Happy Birthday, Duck/Rabbit”Perceptual and Motor Skills89973–977
3.
BugelskiB RAlampayD A, 1961“The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets”Canadian Journal of Psychology15205–211
4.
FisherG H, 1968“Ambiguity of form: Old and new”Perception & Psychophysics4189–192
5.
GoolkasianP, 1987“Ambiguous figures: Role of context and critical features”Journal of General Psychology114217–228
6.
GoolkasianPWoodberryC, 2010“Priming effects with ambiguous figures”Attention, Perception & Psychophysics72168–178
