In two experiments, we investigated whether adults use holistic processing even for faces that are grossly distorted because their eyes have been moved asymmetrically to violate the common layout of a face (distorting its first-order relations). To this end we used a compelling demonstration that faces are processed as wholes, the composite-face effect. Specifically, adults judged the similarity of sequentially presented top halves of normal (original condition) and distorted faces with one eye (one-eye condition) or two eyes (two-eyes condition) shifted up by an abnormal amount. Trials were either blocked by type of distortion (experiment 1) or intermixed within the experiment (experiment 2). In both experiments, participants demonstrated a composite-face effect of the same magnitude in the three conditions, a pattern suggesting that they processed holistically even faces whose first-order relations were violated.
AckermanJ MShapiroJ RNeubergS LKenrickD TBeckerD VGriskeviciusVManerJ KSchallerM, 2006“They all look the same to me unless they're angry: From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity”Psychological Science17836–840.
2.
BahrickH PBahrickP OWittlingerR P, 1975“Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General10454–75.
3.
BiedermanIKalocsaiP, 1997“Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London3521203–1219.
4.
BruceVYoungA, 2000In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
5.
CareyS, 1992“Becoming a face expert”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences33595–103.
6.
CooperE EWojanT J, 2000“Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26470–488.
7.
DakinS CWattR J, 2009“Biological ‘bar codes’ in human faces”Journal of Vision9(4):2, 1–10.
8.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117.
9.
FarkasL GHreczkoT AKaticM J, 1994“Craniofacial norms in North American Caucasians from birth (one year) to young adulthood”, in Anthropometry of the Head and Face Ed. FarkasL G, second edition (New York: Raven Press) pp 241–335.
10.
GalperR E, 1970“Recognition of faces in photographic negative”Psychonomic Science19207–208.
11.
GasparC MBennettP JSekulerA B, 2008“The effects of face inversion and contrast-reversal on efficiency and internal noise”Vision Research481084–1095.
12.
GoffauxVDakinS C, 2010“Horizontal information drives the behavioural signatures of face processing”Frontiers in Psychology1143.
13.
GoffauxVRossionB, 2006“Faces are ‘spatial’—Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance321023–1039.
14.
HaigN D, 1986“Exploring recognition with interchanged facial features”Perception15235–247.
15.
de HeeringAHouthuysSRossionB, 2007“Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: Evidence from the composite face effect”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology9657–70.
16.
de HeeringARossionBTuratiCSimionF, 2008“Holistic face processing can be independent of gaze behaviour: Evidence from the face composite effect”Journal of Neuropsychology2183–195.
17.
HoleG J, 1994“Configural factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces”Perception2365–74.
18.
HoleG JGeorgeP ADunsmoreV, 1999“Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives”Perception28341–359.
19.
KuefnerDJacquesCPrietoE ARossionB, 2010“Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: Disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain”Brain and Cognition74225–238.
20.
Le GrandRMondlochC JMaurerDBrentH P, 2004“Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation”Psychological Science15762–768.
21.
LiuJHarrisAKanwisherN, 2010“Perception of face parts and face configurations: An f MRI study”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22203–211.
22.
CassiaV MacchiPicozziMKuefnerDBricoloETuratiC, 2009“Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: Evidence from the composite effect”Developmental Science12236–248.
23.
MaurerDLe GrandRMondlochC J, 2002“The many faces of configural processing”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6255–260.
24.
MichelCCaldaraRRossionB, 2006a“Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other- race faces”Visual Cognition1455–73.
25.
MichelCRossionBHanJChungC SCaldaraR, 2006b“Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of our own race”Psychological Science17608–615.
26.
MondlochC JRobbinsRMaurerD, 2010“Discrimination of facial features by adults, 10-year-olds, and cataract-reversal patients”Perception39184–194.
27.
RhodesGHaywardW GWinklerC, 2006“Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13499–505.
28.
RichlerJ JCheungO SGauthierI, 2011“Holistic processing predicts face recognition”Psychological Science22464–471.
29.
RossionB, 2008“Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception”Acta Psychologica128274–289.
30.
RossionB, 2009“Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis”Acta Psychologica132300–312.
31.
RossionBBoremanseA, 2008“Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: Evidence from the face composite illusion”Journal of Vision8(4):3, 1–13.
32.
SchiltzCRossionB, 2006“Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex”NeuroImage321385–1394.
33.
SergentJ, 1986“Microgenesis of face perception”, in Aspects of Face Processing Eds EllisH DJeevesM ANewcombeFYoungA M, (Dordrecht: Kluwer) pp 17–33.
34.
SinhaPPoggioT, 1996“I think I know that face”Nature384404.
35.
TanakaJ WFarahM J, 1993“Parts and wholes in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A46225–245.
36.
TaubertJ, 2009“Chimpanzee faces are ‘special’ to humans”Perception38343–356.
37.
TaubertJAlaisD, 2009“The composite illusion requires composite face stimuli to be biologically plausible”Vision Research491877–1885.
38.
TaubertJAlaisD, 2011“Identity aftereffects but not composite effects are contingent on contrast polarity”Perception40422–436.
39.
TaubertJApthorpDAagten-MurphyDAlaisD, 2011“The role of holistic processing in face perception: Evidence from the face inversion effect”Vision Research511273–1278.
40.
TsaoD YLivingstoneM S, 2008“Mechanisms of face perception”Annual Review of Neuroscience31411–437.
41.
TuratiC, 2004“Why faces are not special to newborns: An alternative account of the face preference”Current Directions in Psychological Science135–8.
42.
TuratiCDi GiorgioEBardiLSimionF, 2010“Holistic face processing in newborns, 3-month-old infants, and adults: Evidence from the composite face effect”Child Development811894–1905.
43.
YoungA WHellawellAHayD C, 1987“Configurational information in face perception”Perception16747–759.
