Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the main neurobiological disorders in young children. Despite its prevalence, current diagnosis is debated. In this study we tested whether measures of binocular rivalry (BR) can contribute to the diagnosis of ADHD. BR is a phenomenon that is produced when two different images are presented to the two eyes simultaneously. Under these conditions the image presented to one eye competes with that presented to the other eye in seeking to achieve perceptual dominance. This competition is resolved through the activation of a given percept coupled with the suppression of the percept that had predominated until that point. We assume that the difficulty with inhibiting responses of ADHD children also affects their ability to inhibit the dominant image in a BR context. We analyzed the time to rivalry onset and the inter-dominance periods as measures of the temporal cost of resolving how long it takes for the brain to select (or suppress) one percept over the other. Our results show that the time to onset of rivalry (the first dominance) was longer in the clinical groups (ADHD-C and ADHD-I) than in the control group. As regards the inter-dominance periods, these were longer in the ADHD-C group than among controls, with the shortest period corresponding to the ADHD-I group. This study shows that BR can be used as a tool to develop a behavioral indicator of ADHD.
AdamsZ WDerefinkoK JMilichRFillmoreM T, 2008“Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions”Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews14268–275
2.
CamposJ A AmadorSantacanaM FornsGuàrdia OlmosJPeró CebolleroM, 2006“Estructura factorial y datos normativos del Perfil de atención y del Cuestionario TDAH para niños en edad escolar”Psicothema18696–703
3.
AndersonR MRapportM DKoflerM J, 2007“Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: A meta-analytic review of the stop-signal paradigm”Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology35745–758
4.
APA, 2002Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (text revision) (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association)
5.
CasanovaJ A Aznar, 2010“Test for assessment of the attention-deficit by perceptual rivalry”, Registro de la Propiedad Intelectual N$dG B-1055–10, Spain
6.
BarkleyR A, 1997ADHD and the Nature of Self-control (New York: Guilford Press)
7.
BarkleyR A, 2006Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment3rd edition (New York: Guilford Press)
8.
BarkleyR AMurphyK R, 2006Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders: A Clinical Workbook3rd edition (New York: Guilford Press)
9.
BlakeR, 1989“A neural theory of binocular rivalry”Psychological Review96145–167
CarlsonC LMannM, 2002“Sluggish cognitive tempo predicts a different pattern of impairment in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, primarily inattentive type”Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology31123–129
12.
CarterOCavanaghP, 2007“Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition”PLoS ONE4e343
13.
ChongS CBlakeR, 2006“Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry”Vision Research461794–1803
14.
ChongS CTadinDBlakeR, 2005“Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry”Journal of Vision51004–1012
15.
ConnersC K, 1997Conners' Rating Scales—Revised (Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems)
16.
DiamondA, 2005“Attention-deficit disorder (attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder without hyperactivity): A neurobiologically and behaviorally distinct disorder from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (with hyperactivity)”Development and Psychopathology17807–825
17.
HancockSAndrewsT J, 2007“The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry”Perception36288–298
18.
von HelmholtzH, 1962Treatise on Physiological Optics translated from 3rd German edition by SouthallJ P C, (New York: Dover)
19.
KalisvaartJ PRampersadS MGoossensJ, 2011“Binocular onset rivalry at the time of saccades and stimulus jumps”PLoS ONE6(6), e20017
20.
LammeV ARoelfsemaP R, 2000“The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing”Trends in Neuroscience23571–579
21.
LeeD KIttiLKochCBraunJ, 1999“Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters”Nature Neuroscience2375–381
22.
LehkyS R, 1988“An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry”Perception17215–228
23.
LeopoldD ALogothetisN K, 1996“Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry”Nature379549–553
24.
LeveltW J M, 1965On Binocular Rivalry (Assen: Royal Van Gorcum)
25.
LijffijtMKenemansJ LVerbatenM Nvan EngelandH, 2005“A meta-analytic review of stopping performance in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Deficient inhibitory motor control?Journal of Abnormal Psychology114216–222
26.
LogothetisN KLeopoldD ASheinbergD L, 1996“What is rivaling during binocular rivalry?”Nature300621–624
27.
Martinez-CondeSMacknikS LTroncosoX GHubelD H, 2009“Microsaccades: A neurophysiological analysis”Trends in Neuroscience32463–475
28.
MengMTongF, 2004“Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures”Journal of Vision4539–551
29.
MilichRBalentineA CLynamD R, 2001“ADHD combined type and ADHD predominantly inattentive type are distinct and unrelated disorders”Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice8463–488
MuellerT JBlakeR, 1989“A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry”Biological Cybernetics61223–232
32.
NiggJ T, 2001“Is ADHD an inhibitory disorder?”Psychological Bulletin127571–598
33.
OoiT LHeZ J, 1999“Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention”Perception28551–574
34.
OosterlaanJLoganG DSergeantJ A, 1998“Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the stop task”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry39411–425
35.
PettigrewJ D, 2001“Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations”Brain and Mind285–118
36.
RommelseN N JVan der StigchelSSergeantJ A, 2008“A review on eye movement studies in childhood and adolescent psychiatry”Brain and Cognition68391–414
37.
SergeantJ AGeurtsHOosterlaanJ, 2002“How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?”Behavioural Brain Research1303–28
38.
SheinbergD LLogothetisN K, 1997“The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA943408–3413
39.
TongF, 2001“Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution”Brain and Mind255–83
40.
WechslerD, 2003/2005Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children4th edition (San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment) [Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Niños (Madrid: TEA)]
41.
WheatstoneC, 1838“Contributions to the physiology of vision—part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128371–394
42.
WolfeJ M, 1983“Afterimages, binocular rivalry, and the temporal properties of dominance and suppression”Perception12439–445
