The perceived dominance of percepts within a rival pair of images can be influenced by emotional content, with emotional images dominating over neutral images. We investigated this effect in the periphery. Rival gratings and (fearful or neutral) face/house pairs were viewed centrally and with the near edge positioned 1° and 4° from the fixation. Both fearful and neutral faces were perceived as dominant for significantly longer than houses, with fearful faces dominating for significantly longer than neutral faces at all three eccentricities. There was no difference between dominances at 1° and 4° eccentricity, and there was no difference in the dominance of the gratings at any eccentricity. Our findings show that face stimuli, and in particular fearful faces, continue to dominate perception in binocular rivalry even when viewed in the periphery.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdolphsRTranelDDamasioHDamasioA, 1994“Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala”Nature372669–672
2.
AlpersG WGerdesA B M, 2007“Here is looking at you: Emotional faces predominate in binocular rivalry”Emotion7495–506
3.
AlpersG WPauliP, 2006“Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry”Cognition and Emotion20596–607
4.
AlpersG WRuhlederMWalzNMühlbergerAPauliP, 2005“Binocular rivalry between emotional and neutral stimuli: A validation using fear conditioning and EEG”International Journal of Psychophysiology5725–32
5.
BannermanR LMildersMde GelderBSahraieA, 2008“Influence of emotional facial expressions on binocular rivalry”Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics28317–326
6.
BannermanR LMildersMde GelderBSahraieA, 2009“Orienting to threat: Faster localisation of fearful facial expressions and body postures revealed by saccadic eye movements”Proceedings of the Royal Society B2761635–1641
7.
BannermanR LMildersMSahraieA, 2010“Attentional bias to brief threat-related faces revealed by saccadic eye movements”Emotion10733–738
8.
BannermanR LRegnerPSahraieA, 2011“Binocular rivalry: A window into emotional processing in aging”Psychology and Aging doi: 10.1037/a0022029
9.
BayleD JHénaffM AKrolak-SalmonP, 2009“Unconsciously perceived fear in peripheral vision alerts the limbic system: A MEG study”PLoS One4e8207
10.
BayleD JSchoendorffBHénaffM AKrolak-SalmonP, 2011“Emotional facial expression detected in the peripheral visual field”PLoS One6e21584
11.
BlakeRO'SheaR PMuellerT J, 1992“Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision”Visual Neuroscience8469–478
CorenSRussellJ A, 1992“The relative dominance of different facial expressions of emotion under conditions of perceptual ambiguity”Cognition and Emotion6339–356
15.
van EeR, 2005“Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house – face, and Necker cube rivalry”Vision Research4529–40
FahleM, 1982“Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency”Vision Research22787–800
18.
FoxELesterVRussoRBowlesR JPichlerADuttonK, 2000“Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?”Cognition and Emotion1461–92
19.
MoggKBradleyB P, 1999“Some methodological issues in assessing attentional biases for threatening faces in anxiety: A replication study using a modified version of the probe detection task”Behaviour Research and Therapy6595–604
20.
MuellerT JBlakeR, 1989“A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry”Biological Cybernetics61223–232
21.
OatleyKJohnson-LairdP N, 1987“Towards a cognitive theory of emotions”Cognition and Emotion11–29
22.
ÖhmanAMinekaS, 2001“Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning”Psychological Review108483–522
23.
SterzerPJalkanenLReesG, 2009“Electromagnetic responses to invisible face stimuli during binocular suppression”NeuroImage46803–808
24.
WheatstoneC, 1838“Contributions to the physiology of vision—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128371–394
25.
WilliamsM AMorrisA PMcGloneFAbbottD FMattingleyJ B, 2004“Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expression under conditions of binocular suppression”Journal of Neuroscience242898–2904
26.
YangEZaldD HBlakeR, 2007“Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression”Emotion7882–886
27.
YoonK LHongS WJoormanJKangP, 2009“Perception of facial expressions of emotion during binocular rivalry”Emotion9172–182
