A simple experimental arrangement is designed to foil verbal rehearsal during an extended (from 5 to 30 s) retention interval across which participants attempt to discriminate two periodic complex sounds. Sounds have an abstract timbre that does not lend itself to verbal labeling, they differ across trials so that no ‘standard’ comparison stimulus is built up by the participants, and the spectral change to be discriminated is very slight and therefore does not shift the stimulus into a new verbal category. And, crucially, in one experimental condition, participants read aloud during most of the retention interval. Despite these precautions, performance is robust across the extended retention interval. The inference is that one form of auditory memory does not require verbal rehearsal. Nevertheless, modest forgetting occurred. Whatever form memory takes in this situation, it is not totally secure from disruption.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonL AChristiansonG BLindenJ F, 2009“Stimulus-specific adaptation occurs in the auditory thalamus”Journal of Neuroscience297359–7363
2.
AngellF, 1900“Discrimination of clangs for different intervals of time. Part II”American Journal of Psychology1258–79
3.
AngellFHarwoodH, 1899“Experiments on discrimination of clangs for different intervals of time”American Journal of Psychology1167–79
4.
BiJ, 2002“Variance of d' for the same – different method”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers3437–45
5.
BrownG D ANeathIChaterN, 2007“A temporal ratio model of memory”Psychological Review114539–576
6.
CowanN, 1984“On short and long auditory stores”Psychological Bulletin96341–370
7.
CowanN, 2009“Sensory and immediate memory”, in Encyclopedia of Consciousnessvolume 2, Ed. BanksW P, (Oxford: Elsevier) pp 327–339
8.
CowanNSaultsJ SNugentL D, 2001“The ravages of absolute and relative amounts of time on memory”, in The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G Crowder Eds RoedigerH LIIINairneJ SNeathISuprenantA, (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association) pp 315–330
9.
CrowderR GGreeneR L, 2000“Serial learning: Cognition and behavior”, in The Oxford Handbook of Memory Eds TulvingECraikF I M, (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 125–135
10.
DeiberM-PMissonnierPBertrandOGoldGFazio-CostaLIbañezVGiannakopoulosP, 2007“Distinction between perceptual and attentional processing in working memory tasks: A study of phase-locked and induced oscillatory brain dynamics”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience19158–172
11.
DemanyLMontandonGSemalC, 2004“Pitch perception and retention: Two cumulative benefits of selective attention”Perception & Psychophysics66609–617
12.
DemanyLSemalC, 2008“The role of memory in auditory perception”, in Auditory Perception of Sound Sources Eds YostWAPopperA NFaysR F, (New York: Springer) pp 77–114
13.
DeutschD, 1970“Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in immediate memory”Science1681604–1605
14.
DeutschD, 1999“The processing of pitch combinations”, in The Psychology of Musicsecond edition, Ed. DeutschD, (New York: Academic Press) pp 349–411
15.
DurlachN IBraidaL D, 1969“Intensity perception: I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America46372–383
16.
DüzelEPennyW DBurgessN, 2010“Brain oscillations and memory”Current Opinion in Neuro-biology20143–149
17.
ElhilaliMMaLMicheylCOxenhamA JShammaS A, 2009“Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes”Neuron61317–329
18.
GourevitchVGalanterE, 1967“A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions”Psychometrika3225–33
19.
GreenD M, 1988Profile Analysis: Auditory Intensity Discrimination (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
20.
GreenD MKiddGJrPicardiM C, 1983“Successive versus simultaneous comparison in auditory intensity discrimination”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America73639–643
21.
GreenT JMcKeownD, 2007“The role of auditory memory traces in attention to frequency”Perception & Psychophysics69942–951
22.
HarrisJ D, 1952“The decline of pitch discrimination with time”Journal of Experimental Psychology43296–99
23.
JonidesLLewisR LNeeD ELustigC ABermanM GMooreK S, 2008“The mind and brain of short-term memory”Annual Review of Psychology59193–224
24.
JumpR LRiesD T, 2008“Effect of interaural level and phase cues on intervening interference in auditory working memory for tones”Hearing Research240112–115
25.
KaernbachC, 2004a“Auditory sensory memory and short-term memory”, in Psychophysics Beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition Eds KaernbachCSchrögerEMüllerH, (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 331–348
26.
KaernbachC, 2004b“The memory of noise”Experimental Psychology51240–248
27.
KellerT ACowanNSaultsJ S, 1995“Can auditory memory for tone pitch be rehearsed?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition21635–645
28.
LewandowskySGeigerS MOberauerKMorrellD B, 2010“Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition36958–978
29.
LewandowskySOberauerKBrownG D A, 2009“No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory”Trends in Cognitive Sciences13120–126
30.
LockhartR S, 2000“Methods of memory research”, in The Oxford Handbook of Memory Eds TulvingECraikF I M, (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 45–57
31.
LustigCBermanM GNeeD ELewisR LMooreK SledgeJonidesJ, 2009“Psychological and neural mechanisms of short-term memory”, in Handbook of Neuroscience and Behavioral Science Eds BerntsonG GCacioppoJ T, (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley) pp 567–585
32.
McKeownDMercerT, submitted “Short-term forgetting without interference”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
33.
McKeownDWellstedD, 2009“Auditory memory for timbre”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance35855–875
34.
MacmillanN ACreelmanC D, 2005Detection Theory: A User's Guidesecond edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
35.
MarascuiloL A, 1970“Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses”Psychometrica35237–243
36.
MassaroD W, 1970“Forgetting: Interference or decay?”Journal of Experimental Psychology83238–243
MercerTMcKeownD, 2010a“Interference in short-term auditory memory”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology631256–1265
39.
MercerTMcKeownD, 2010b“Updating and feature overwriting in short-term memory for timbre”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics722289–2303
40.
MichaelG A, 2007“A significance test of interactions in 2×K designs with proportions”Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology31–7
41.
MondorT AMorinS R, 2004“Primacy recency and suffix effects in auditory short-term memory for pure tones: Evidence from a probe recognition paradigm”Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology58206–219
42.
MuellerS TKrawitzA, 2009“Reconsidering the two-second decay hypothesis in verbal working memory”Journal of Mathematical Psychology5314–25
43.
NairneJ S, 2002“Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model”Annual Review of Psychology5353–81
44.
NairneJ S, 2003“Sensory and working memory”, in Handbook of Psychology volume 4 Experimental Psychology Eds HealyA FProctorR WWeinerI B, (New York: John Wiley) pp 423–444
45.
NairneJ SPandeiradaJ N S, 2008“Forgetting”, in Cognitive Psychology of Memory volume 2 Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference Ed. RoedigerH LIII, (Oxford: Elsevier) pp 179–194
46.
NelkenIUlanovskyN, 2007“Mismatch negativity and stimulus-specific adaptation in animal models”Journal of Psychophysiology21214–223
47.
NimmoL MLewandowskyS, 2006“Distinctiveness revisited: Unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events”Memory and Cognition341368–1375
48.
OberauerKLewandowskyS, 2008“Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay temporal distinctiveness or interference?”Psychological Review115544–576
49.
PechmannTMohrG, 1992“Interference in memory for tonal pitch: Implications for a working memory model”Memory and Cognition20314–320
50.
PortratSBarrouilletPCamosV, 2008“Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition61561–1564
RiesD TDiGiovanniJ J, 2007“Release from interference in auditory working memory for pitch”Hearing Research23064–72
53.
RiesD THamiltonT RGrossmannA J, 2010“The effects of intervening interference on working memory for sound location as a function of inter-comparison interval”Hearing Research268227–233
54.
SamsMHariRRifJKnuutilaJ, 1993“The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 sec: Neuromagnetic evidence”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience5363–370
55.
SemalCDemanyLUedaKHalléP-A, 1996“Speech versus nonspeech in pitch memory”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1001132–1140
56.
StarrG EPittM A, 1997“Interference effects in short-term memory for timbre”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America102486–494
57.
UedaK, 2004“Short-term auditory memory interference: The Deutsch demonstration revisited”Acoustic Science and Technology25457–467
58.
UlanovskyNLasLNelkenI, 2003“Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons”Nature Neuroscience6391–398
59.
WatkinsM JTodresA K, 1980“Suffix effects manifest and concealed: Further evidence for a 20-second echo”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior1946–53
60.
WatkinsO CWatkinsM J, 1980“The modality effect and echoic memory”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General109251–278
61.
WinklerICowanN, 2005“From sensory to long-term memory: Evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies”Experimental Psychology523–20
62.
WixtedJ T, 2004“The psychology and neuropsychology of forgetting”Annual Review of Psychology55235–269
