We tested whether visual complexity can be modeled through the use of parameters relevant to known mechanisms of visual processing. In psychophysical experiments observers ranked the complexity of two groups of stimuli: 15 unfamiliar Chinese hieroglyphs and 24 outline images of well-known common objects. To predict image complexity, we considered: (i) spatial characteristics of the images, (ii) spatial-frequency characteristics, (iii) a combination of spatial and Fourier properties, and (iv) the size of the image encoded as a JPEG file. For hieroglyphs the highest correlation was obtained when complexity was calculated as the product of the squared spatial-frequency median and the image area. This measure accounts for the larger number of lines, strokes, and local periodic patterns in the hieroglyphs. For outline objects the best predictor of the experimental data was complexity estimated as the number of turns in the image, as Attneave (1957 Journal of Experimental Psychology53 221–227) obtained for his abstract outlined images. Other predictors of complexity gave significant but lower correlations with the experimental ranking. We conclude that our modeling measures can be used to estimate the complexity of visual images but for different classes of images different measures of complexity may be required.
AttneaveF, 1957“Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes”Journal of Experimental Psychology53221–227.
2.
BlakemoreGCampbellF W, 1969“On the existence in human visual system of neurones selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal image”Journal of Physiology203237–260.
3.
CampbellF W, 1980“The physics of visual perception”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B2905–9.
4.
CampbellF WCooperCRobsonJSachsM, 1969“The spatial selectivity of visual cells of the cat and squirrel monkey”Journal of Physiology204120–122.
5.
CampbellF WRobsonJ G, 1968“Application of Fourier analyses to the visibility of gratings”Journal of Physiology197551–566.
6.
CampbellF WShelepinY E, 1989“The mechanics of the foveola and its role in defining an object”Perception18 Supplement, 532.
7.
CampbellF WShelepinY E, 1990“Foveolar object discrimination ability”Sensory Systems4181–185 (in Russian).
8.
CampbellF WShelepinY ETegederR WPavlovN N, 1992“Psychophysical measurement of the intercone separation and object recognition in the human foveola”Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics12101–102.
9.
CardaciMDi GesùVPetrouMTabacchiM E, 2009“A fuzzy approach to the evaluation of image complexity”Fuzzy Sets and Systems1601474–1484.
10.
CuttingJ EGarvinJ J, 1987“Fractal curves and complexity”Perception & Psychophysics42365–370.
11.
DiringerD, 1948The Alphabet: A Key to the History of Mankind (New York: Philosophical Library).
12.
DonderiD, 2006“Visual complexity: A review”Psychological Bulletin13273–97.
13.
DudkinK NChuevaI V, 1997“Relationship between learning characteristics and the properties of visual objects in rhesus macaques”Neurosience and Behavioral Physiology27570–577.
14.
Duke-ElderS, 1962System of Ophthalmology: The Foundations of OphthalmologyVolume 7 (London: H Kimpton).
15.
EarnshawG, 1995“Image complexity measure”, Technical Report CT92–0015C, Centre for Intelligent Systems, University of Plymouth.
16.
FieldD J, 1994“What is the goal of sensory coding?”Neural Computation6559–601.
17.
ForsytheAMulhernGSaweyM, 2008“Confounds in pictorial sets: The role of complexity and familiarity in basic-level picture processing”Behavior Research Methods40116–129.
18.
ForsytheANadalMSheehyNCela-CondeC JSaweyM, 2011“Predicting beauty: Fractal dimension and visual complexity in art”British Journal of Psychology10249–70.
19.
GinsburgA P, 1971“Psychological correlates of a model of the human visual system”IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 71-C-AES, 283–290.
20.
GinsburgA P, 1986“Spatial filtering and visual form perception”Handbook of Perception and Human Performance341–41.
21.
GlezerV D, 1985Vision and Mind (Moscow: Nauka) in Russian.
22.
GlezerV D, 1995Vision and Mind: Modeling visual functions (New York: Erlbaum).
23.
GlezerV DIvanovV ATcherbachT A, 1973“Investigation of complex and hypercomplex receptive fields of visual cortex of the cat as spatial frequency filters”Vision Research131875–1904.
24.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1962“Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex”Journal of Physiology160251–260.
25.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1965“Receptive fields and functional architecture in two non-striate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat”Journal of Neurophysiology28229–289.
26.
KendallM GStuartA, 1962The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Distribution Theory (London: Wiley- Blackwell).
27.
KendallM GStuartA, 1966Distribution Theory (Moscow: Nauka) in Russian.
28.
KolmogorovA N, 1965“Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information”Problems of Information Transmission13–11 (in Russian).
29.
MaffeiLFiorentiniA, 1973“The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser”Vision Research131255–1267.
30.
MurguiaMSaenzARodriguezR, 2007“A Fuzzy approach on image complexity measure”Computacion Sistemas10268–284.
31.
NäsänenRKukkonenHRovamoJ, 1993“Spatial integration of band-pass filtered patterns in noise”Vision Research33903–911.
32.
NygårdG EVan LooyTWagemansJ, 2009“The influence of orientation jitter and motion on contour saliency”Vision Research492475–2484.
33.
OlshausenBFieldD J, 1996“Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images”Nature381607–609.
34.
PelliD GBurnsC WFarellBMoore-PageD C, 2006“Feature detection and letter identification”Vision Research464646–4674.
35.
PerjuV, 2003“Determination of the image complexity feature in pattern recognition”Computer Science Journal of Moldova11231–247.
36.
PerkiöJHyvärinenA, 2009“Modelling image complexity by independent component analysis, with application to content-based image retrieval”19th International Conference on Artificial Neural NetworksII1–11.
37.
PetersRIIStricklandR, 1990“Image complexity metrics for automatic target recognizers”Automatic Target Recognizer Systems and Technology Conference, 30–31 OctoberNaval Surface Warfare Center, Silver Spring, MD, pp 1–17.
38.
RiggsR A, 1974“Curvature detectors in human vision?”Science1841200–1203.
ShelepinY EBondarkoV MDanilovaM V, 1995“Construction of foveola and model of pyramidal organization of the visual system”Sensory Systems986–96 (in Russian).
41.
ShevelevI ALazarevaN ASharaevG ANovikovR VTikhomirovA S, 1998“Selective and invariant sensitivity to crosses and corners in cat striate neurons”The Journal of Neuroscience84713–720.
SnodgrassJ GVanderwartM, 1980“A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory6174–215.
44.
StromeyerC F, 1974“Curvature detectors in human vision?”Science1841199–1200.
45.
TylerC W, 1978“Selectivity for spatial frequency and bar width in cat visual cortex”Vision Research18121–126.
46.
UllmanSVidal-NaquetMSaliE, 2002“Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification”Nature Neuroscience5682–687.
47.
VakhrameevaO AMezentsevA YProninS VShelepinY E, 2006“Studies of stimulus complexity in the Gollin test”Perception35 Supplement, 79.
48.
VarskyB VGuzeevaM A, 1962“Dependence of spatial thresholds of seeing on information content of planar figure”Voprosy Psychologii2101–112 (in Russian).
49.
VifanskyY K, 1966“Complexity estimation of the figures' form and their recognition”Mechanisms of Coding of Visual Information (Moscow/Leningrad: Nauka) pp 61–74 (in Russian).
50.
VitzP CToddT C, 1971“A model of the perception of simple geometric figures”Psychological Review78207–228.
51.
WhitakerDMcGrawP V, 1998“Geometric representation of the mechanisms underlying human curvature detection”Vision Research383843–3848.
52.
XuYChunM M, 2006“Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects”Nature44091–95.
