The line-motion illusion has been regarded as the result of attention. An alternative interpretation is that the illusion is related to apparent motion which would predict the stimuli to contain motion energy associated with the direction of the illusory motion. In order to examine this possibility Fourier transforms of x – t plots of line-motion stimuli were generated under a variety of conditions. The sums of amplitudes associated with movement in the directions away from the cue relative to that towards the cue were compared to previously published psychophysical observations. It was found that the amplitude sums are largely consistent with the psychophysical results. In the few cases where there were discrepancies between results based on amplitude spectra and psychophysical findings, these discrepancies could be accounted for by making relatively simple and plausible assumptions. The present observations suggest that motion energy may be sufficient to account for the line-motion illusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonE HBergenJ R, 1985“Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion”Journal of the Optical Society of America A2284–299
2.
BalochA AGrossbergS, 1997“A neural model of high-level motion processing: Line motion and formation dynamics”Vision Research373037–3059
3.
BavelierDSchneiderK AMonacelliA, 2002“Reflexive gaze orienting induces the line-motion illusion”Vision Research422817–2827
4.
CampbellF WRobsonJ G, 1968“Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings”Journal of Physiology197551–566
5.
ChenYBidwellL CHolzmanP S, 2005“Visual motion integration in schizophrenia patients, their first-degree relatives, and patients with bipolar disorder”Schizophrenia Research74271–281
6.
ChenYLevyD LSheremataSHolzmanP S, 2004“Compromised late-stage motion processing in schizophrenia”Biological Psychiatry55834–841
7.
ChenYLevyD LSheremataSHolzmanP S, 2006“Bipolar and schizophrenic patients differ in patterns of visual motion discrimination”Schizophrenia Research88208–216
8.
ChenYNakayamaKLevyDMatthysseSHolzmanP, 2003“Processing of global, but not local motion direction is deficient in schizophrenia”Schizophrenia Research61215–227
9.
ChenYPalafaxG PNakayamaKLevyD LMatthyseSHolzmanP S, 1999“Motion perception in schizophrenia”Archives of General Psychiatry56149–154
10.
ChristieJKleinR M, 2005“Does attention cause illusory line motion?”Perception & Psychophysics671032–1043
11.
CrawfordT JHammJ PKeanMSchmechtigAKumariVAnikumarA PEttingerU, 2010“The perception of real and illusory motioin in schizophrenia”Neuropsychologia483121–3127
12.
CrawfordT JKeanMKleinR MHammJ P, 2006“The effects of illusory line motion on incongruent saccades: Implications for saccadic eye movements and visual attention”Experimental Brain Research173498–506
13.
DowningP ETreismanA M, 1997“The line-motion: Attention or impletion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23768–779
14.
EaglemanD MSejnowskiT J, 2003“The line-motion illusion can be reversed by motion signals after the line disappears”Perception32963–968
15.
FaubertJvon GrünauM W, 1992“Split attention and attribute priming in motion induction”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science33S1139
16.
FaubertJvon GrünauM W, 1995“The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction”Vision Research353119–3130
17.
FullerSCarrascoM, 2009“Perceptual consequences of visual performance fields: The case of the line motion illusion”Journal of Vision9(4) 13, 1 – 17, doi:10.1167/9.4.13
18.
von GrünauM WDubeSKwasM, 1996“Two contributions of motion induction: A preattentive effect and facilitation due to attention capture”Vision Research362447–2457
19.
von GrünauM WFaubertJ, 1994“Intraattribute and interattribute motion induction”Perception23913–928
20.
HartW M, 1992“The temporal responsiveness of vision”, in Adler's Physiology of the Eye (9th edition) Ed. HartW M, (St Louis, MO: Mosby) pp 548–578
21.
HikosakaOMiyauchiSShimojoS, 1993a“Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation”Vision Research331219–1240
22.
HikosakaOMiyauchiSShimojoS, 1993b“Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation”Perception22517–526
23.
HolcombeA O, 2003“Occlusion cues resolve sudden onsets into morphing or line motion, disocclusion, and sudden materialization”Journal of Vision3563–572
24.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1962“Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex”Journal of Physiology160106–154
25.
KawaharaJYokosawaKNishidaSSatoT, 1996“Illusory line motion in visual search: Attention facilitation or apparent motion”Perception25901–920
26.
KimDWylieGPasternakRButlerP DJavittD C, 2006“Magnocellular contributions to impaired motion processing in schizophrenia”Schizophrenia Research821–8
27.
LeeJMaunsellJ H R, 2010“The effect of attention on neuronal responses to high and low contrast stimuli”Journal of Neurophysiology104960–971
28.
LevinsonESekulerR, 1975“The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement”Journal of Physiology250347–366
29.
MovshonJ ANewsomeW T, 1996“Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys”Journal of Neuroscience167733–7741
30.
SchillerP HLogothetisN KCharlesE R, 1990“Role of the color-opponent and broad-band channels in vision”Visual Neuroscience5321–346
31.
SkottunB C, 2011“On the use of visual motion perception to assess magnocellular integrity”Journal of Integrative Neuroscience1015–32
32.
SkottunB CSkoylesJ R, 2006a“Is coherent motion an appropriate test for magnocellular sensitivity?”Brain and Cognition61172–180
33.
SkottunB CSkoylesJ R, 2006b“Attention, dyslexia, and the line-motion illusion”Optometry and Vision Science83843–849
34.
SteinmanB ASteinmanS BGarziaR P, 1998“Vision and attention. II: Is visual attention a mechanism through which a deficient magnocellular pathway might cause reading disability?”Optometry and Vision Science75674–681
35.
SteinmanS BSteinmanB ALehmkuhleS, 1997“Transient visual attention is dominated by the magnocellular stream”Vision Research3717–23
36.
TsePCavanaghP, 1995“Line motion occurs after surface parsing”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science36S417 (abstract)
37.
TsePCavanaghPNakayamaK, 1996“The roles of attention in shape change apparent motion”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science37S213 (abstract)
38.
TsePCavanaghPNakayamaK, 1998“The role of parsing in high-level motion processing”, in High-level Motion Processing—Computational, Neurobiological and Psychophysical Perspectives Ed. WatanabeT, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 249–266
39.
TseP ULogothetisN K, 2002“The duration of 3-D form analysis in transformational apparent motion”Perception & Psychophysics64244–265
40.
WatsonA BAhumadaAJr, 1985“Model of human visual-motion sensing”Journal of the Optical Society of America A2322–341
41.
WatsonA BAhumadaAJrFarrellJ E, 1986“Window of visibility: A psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual motion displays”Journal of the Optical Society of America A3300–307
