Research on perception of attractiveness of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) described here has shown that people prefer relatively long-legged silhouettes (particularly while assessing women). The LBR of attractive women over historical periods (analyses of attractive silhouettes from paintings, sculptures, etc) has been more changeable than that of men. The findings reported here might represent evidence against the cross-cultural universality of the attractiveness of long legs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoginBVarela-SilvaM I, 2010“Leg length, body proportion, and health: a review with a note on beauty”International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health71047–1075
2.
EcoU, 2005History of Beauty (London: Secker & Warburg)
3.
FeldmanWFeldmanEGoodmanJ T, 1988“Culture versus biology: Children's attitudes towards thinness and fatness”Pediatrics81190–194
4.
FrederickD AHadji-MichaelMFurnhamASwamiV, 2010“The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: Assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR”Body Image751–55
5.
RillingJ KKaufmanT LSmithE OPatelRWorthmanC M, 2009“Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness”Evolution and Human Behavior3021–31
6.
SorokowskiPPawlowskiB, 2008“Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner”Evolution and Human Behavior2986–91
7.
SwamiVEinonDFurnhamA, 2006“The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion”Body Image3317–323
8.
SwamiVEinonDFurnhamA, 2007“Cultural significance of leg-to-body ratio preferences? Evidence from British and rural Malaysia”Asian Journal of Social Psychology10265–269
9.
TatarkiewiczW, 2006History of Aesthetics3 volumes (Bristol: Thoemmes Press)
