People undeniably pay attention to faces, and facial resemblance may act as a kinship cue. However, previous studies have shown that the ability to detect kinship through facial resemblance is limited, and it has been suggested that this may be due to several types of perceptual factors. To further understand the processes that underpin kinship judgment, it is important to investigate which perceptual factors predict the probability of parent–child pairs being detected as related. To this end, we performed two experiments. In the first, we evaluated the ability of human observers to match newborns with one of their parents. In the second, we explored three perceptual factors that may have influenced kinship detection (gender discrimination, facial attractiveness, and perceptual similarity). Results showed that the participants were able to match newborns with one of their parents, even though the task was perceived as difficult. Moreover, our study goes further than previous findings, showing that the perceptual factors investigated may significantly contribute to kinship detection.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvergneAFaurieCRaymondM, 2007“Differential facial resemblance of young children to their parents: Who do children look like more?”Evolution and Human Behavior28135–144
2.
AlvergneAOdaRFaurieCMatsumoto-OdaADurandVRaymondM, 2009“Cross-cultural perceptions of facial resemblance between kin”Journal of Vision91–10
3.
BrédartSFrenchR M, 1999“Do babies resemble their fathers more than their mothers? A failure to replicate Christenfeld & Hill (1995)”Evolution and Human Behavior20129–135
4.
BressanPDal MartelloM F, 2002“TALIS PATER, TALIS FILIUS: Perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness”Psychological Science13213–219
5.
BressanPGrassiM, 2004“Parental resemblance in 1-year-olds and the Gaussian curve”Evolution and Human Behavior25133–141
6.
ChristenfeldN J SHillE A, 1995“Whose baby are you?”Nature378669
7.
DaileyM NCottrellG W, 1999“Organization of face and object recognition in modular neural networks”Neural Networks121053–1074
8.
DaileyM NCottrellG WPadgettCRalphA, 2002“EMPATH: A neural network that categorizes facial expressions”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience141158–1173
9.
DalyMWilsonM I, 1982“Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?”Ethology and Sociobiology369–78
10.
DaugmanJ G, 1985“Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters”Journal of the Optical Society of America A21160–1169
11.
DeBruineL MJonesB CLittleA CPerrettD I, 2008“Social perception of facial resemblance in humans”Archives of Sexual Behavior3764–77
12.
DudleyS AFileA, 2007“Kin recognition in an annual plant”Biology Letters3435–438
13.
GreenbergL, 1979“Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition”Science2061095–1097
14.
HamiltonW D, 1964“The genetic evolution of social behavior. Part I”Journal of Theoretical Biology71–16
15.
HepperP G, 1991Kin Recognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
16.
JonesJ PPalmerL A, 1987“The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology581187–1211
17.
JonesJ PStepnoskiAPalmerL A, 1987“The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology581212–1232
18.
KaminskiGDridiSGraffCGentazE, 2009“Human ability to detect kinship in strangers' faces: effects of the degree of relatedness”Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B2763193–3200
19.
KaminskiGRavaryFGraffCGentazE, in press, “First-borns at a disadvantage? Later-borns surpass first-borns in kinship detection of strangers' faces”Psychological Science
20.
KruschkeJ K, 1992“ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning”Psychological Review9922–44
21.
LewinCHerlitzA, 2002“Sex differences in face recognition–women's faces make the difference”Brain Cognition50121–128
22.
LiebermanDToobyJCosmidesL, 2007“The architecture of human kin detection”Nature445727–731
23.
LittleA CHancockP J B, 2002“The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgements of human male facial attractiveness”British Journal of Psychology93451–464
24.
LittlewortGBartlettMFaselISusskindJMovellanJ, 2006“Dynamics of facial expression extracted automatically from video”Image and Vision Computing24615–625
25.
McLainD KSettersDMoultonM PPrattA E, 2000“Ascription of resemblance of newborns by parents and nonrelatives”Evolution and Human Behavior2111–23
26.
MaloneyL TDal MartelloM F, 2006“Kin recognition and the perceived facial perceptual similarity of children”Journal of Vision61047–1056
27.
MermillodMGuyaderNChauvinA, 2005a“The coarse-to-fine hypothesis revisited: Evidence from neuro-computational modeling”Brain Cognition57151–157
28.
MermillodMGuyaderNChauvinA, 2005b“Improving generalisation skills in a neural network on the basis of neurophysiological data”Brain Cognition58246–248
29.
MermillodMVermeulenNLundqvistDNiedenthalP M, 2009a“Neural computation as a tool to differentiate perceptual from emotional processes: The case of anger superiority effect”Cognition110346–357
30.
MermillodMVuilleumierPPeyrinCAlleyssonDMarendazC, 2009b“The importance of low spatial-frequency information for recognizing fearful facial expressions”Connection Science2175–83
31.
NesseR MSilvermanABortzA, 1990“Gender differences in ability to recognize family resemblance”Ethology and Sociobiology1111–21
32.
OdaRMatsumoto-OdaAKurashimaO, 2005“Effects of belief in genetic relatedness on resemblance judgments by Japanese raters”Evolution and Human Behavior26441–450
33.
PorterR HCernochJ MBaloghR D, 1984“Recognition of neonates by facial-visual characteristics”Pediatrics74501–505
34.
QuellerD CPonteEBozzaroSStrassmannJ E, 2003“Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba”Dictyostelium discoideum Science299105–106
35.
RegalskiJ MGaulinS J C, 1993“Whom are Mexican infants said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the Yucatan”Ethology and Sociobiology1497–113
36.
ShepardR N, 1987“Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science”Science2371317–1323
37.
SloneA EBrighamJ CMeissnerC A, 2000“Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites”Basic Applied Social Psychology2271–84
38.
SokalR RRohlfF J, 1995Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research3rd edition (New York: W H Freeman)
39.
VokeyJ RRendallDTangenJ MParrLde WaalF B M, 2004“On visual kin recognition and family resemblance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)”Journal of Comparative Psychology118194–199
40.
WickhamL H VMorrisP E, 2003“Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: Attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized”American Journal of Psychology116455–468
41.
WildH HBarrettS ESpenceM JO'TooleA JChengY DBrookeJ, 2000“Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces in the absence of sex stereotyped cues”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology77261–299
42.
WiskottL, 1997“Phantom faces for face analysis”Pattern Recognition30837–846
43.
ZajoncR BAdelmannP KMurphyS TNiedenthalP M, 1987“Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses”Motivation and Emotion4335–346
