Past efforts to determine whether orientation-dependent sensitivity to right angles is due to retinal or environmental/gravitational frames of reference have produced conflicting conclusions. I attempt to show that the chief factor underlying this phenomenon is, rather, the shape of the object containing the angle. This shape mediates the typical orientation of the object in a ground–gravity context and the consequent force-structure of the incorporated angle—a force structure that is reflected in the percept.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttneaveF, 1968“Triangles as ambiguous figures”American Journal of Psychology31447–453
2.
ChenSLeviD M, 1996“Meridional anisotropy in the discrimination of parallel and perpendicular lines–effect of body tilt”Perception25633–649
3.
DriverJBaylisG CGoodrichS JRafalR D, 1994“Axis-based neglect of visual shapes”Neuropsychologia321353–1365
4.
FerranteDGerbinoWRockI, 1995“Retinal vs environmental orientation in the perception of the right angle”Acta Psychologica8825–32
5.
GoldmeierE, 1972“Similarity in visually perceived forms”Psychological Issues81–135
6.
HochbergJ EMcAlisterE, 1953“A quantitative approach to figural ‘goodness’”Journal of Experimental Psychology46361–364
7.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace)
8.
MachE, 1897/1959Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen, 1897; translated into English by WilliamsC MThe Analysis of Sensations (New York: Dover Inc.)
9.
RockILeamanR, 1963“An experimental analysis of visual symmetry”Acta Psychologica21171–183
10.
SchianoD JMcBeathM KChambersK W, 2008“Regularity of symmetry verticality guides perceptual judgments of objects”American Journal of Psychology121209–227
11.
SnippeH PKoenderinkJ J, 1994“Discrimination of geometric angle in the frontoparallel plane”Spatial Vision8309–328
