In two experiments, we compared the performance of normal-reading (n = 26) and dyslexic children (n = 22) in discriminating letters from their mirrored images. In experiment 1, they were always presented in the upright orientation; in experiment 2, they were presented in different angular orientations (0°, 90°, 180°). In order to determine whether task and dyslexia affect reaction times in early or late stages of processing, a dual-task paradigm was adopted in which the primary task was tone discrimination. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between first and second task was systematically varied (50 ms versus 400 ms). In both experiments dyslexics were slower overall than controls. No effects of mirror-image letters were found. In experiment 2, mental-rotation effects were additive with SOA. In accordance with earlier findings we concluded that the mental-rotation effect involves central processing capacity. Mental-rotation effects were the same for normal-reading and dyslexic children; mental rotation is not impaired in dyslexia. Remarkably, SOA effects were larger in normal readers than in dyslexics. This result was explained by observing that dyslexics experience decision difficulties already on the first task. As a result, they do not benefit optimally from increased latencies between first and second tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association, 1994Diagnostic and Statistical Manual on Mental Disorders4th edition (DSM+V) (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press).
2.
BadianN A, 2005“Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability?”Annals of Dyslexia5528–52.
3.
BeckerCElliottMLachmannT, 2005“Evidence for impaired visuo-perceptual organization in developmental dyslexia and its relation to temporal processes”Cognitive Neuropsychology21273–278.
4.
BradyS AShankweilerD P, 1991Phonological Processes in Literacy: A Tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
5.
BreuerHWeuffenM, 1995Lernschwierigkeiten am Schulanfang: Lautsprachliche Lernvoraussetzungen und Schulerfolg [Learning difficulties at the beginning of schooling] (Weinheim, Switzerland: Belz).
6.
CalhounV DAdaliTMcGintyV BPekarJ JWatsonT DPearlsonG D, 2001“fMRI activation in a visual-perception task: Network of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis”NeuroImage141080–1088.
7.
CooperL AShepardR N, 1973“Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images”, in Visual Information Processing Ed. ChaseW G, (New York: Academic Press) pp 75–176.
8.
CorballisM CBealeI L, 1970“Bilateral symmetry and behavior”Psychological Review77451–464.
9.
CorballisM CBealeI L, 1993“Orton revisited: Dyslexia, laterality, and left–right confusion”, in Visual Processes in Reading and Reading Disabilities Eds WillowsDKrukR SCorcosE, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 57–73.
10.
CorballisM CMacadieLBealeI L, 1985a“Mental rotation and visual laterality in normal and reading-disabled children”Cortex21225–236.
11.
CorballisM CMacadieLCrottyABealeI L, 1985b“The naming of disoriented letters by normal and reading-disabled children”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines26929–938.
12.
FawcettA JNicolsonR I, 2001“Dyslexia: The role of the cerebellum”, in Dyslexia: Theory and Good Practice Ed. FawcettA J, (London: Whurr) pp 89–105.
13.
FrithU, 2001“What framework should we use for understanding developmental disorders”Developmental Neuropsychology20555–563.
14.
GarnerW RClementD E, 1963“Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior2446–452.
15.
HeilMWahlKHerbstM, 1999“Mental rotation, memory scanning, and the central bottleneck”Psychological Research6248–61.
16.
HellerK AKrantzmeierHLengfelderA, 1998Matrizen-Test-Manual. Band 1. Ein Handbuch mit deutschen Normen zu den Standard Progressive Matrices von J. C. Raven (Göttingen: Hogrefe).
17.
Jansen-OsmannPHeilM, 2007“Developmental aspects of parietal hemispheric asymmetry during mental rotation”NeuroReport18175–178.
18.
JaskowskiPRusiakP, 2005“Posterior parietal cortex and developmental dyslexia”Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis6579–94.
19.
JolicoeurP, 1999“Dual-task interference and visual encoding”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25596–616.
20.
JordanKHeinzeH-JLutzKKanowskiMJänckeL, 2001“Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects”NeuroImage13143–152.
21.
LachmannT, 2002“Reading disability as a deficit in functional coordination and information integration”, in Basic Functions of Language, Reading, and Reading Disability Neuropsychology and Cognition series, Eds WitrukEFriedericiA DLachmannT, (Boston, MA: Kluwer/Springer) pp 165–198.
22.
LachmannTBertiSKujalaTSchrögerE, 2005“Diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia have different deficits in neural processing of tones and phonemes”International Journal of Psychophysiology56105–120.
23.
LachmannTvan LeeuwenC, 2005“Individual pattern representations are context-independent, but their collective representation is context-dependent”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology581265–1294.
24.
LachmannTvan LeeuwenC, 2007a“Paradoxical enhancement of letter recognition in developmental dyslexia”Developmental Neuropsychology3161–77.
LanderlKWimmerH, 2000“Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children”Applied Psycholinguistics21243–262.
27.
LanderlKWimmerHMoserE, 1997Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtest: Verfahren zur Differentialdiagnose von Störungen des Lesens und Schreibens für die 1. bis 4. Schulstufe (Bern: Hans Huber).
28.
LovegroveWBowlingA CBadcockDBlackwoodM, 1980“Specific reading disability: Differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency”Science210439–440.
29.
MarsolekC JBurgundE D, 2008“Dissociable neural subsystems underlie visual working memory for abstract categories and specific exemplars”Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience817–24.
30.
MilesE, 1995“Can there be a single definition of dyslexia?”Dyslexia137–45.
31.
NavonDMillerJ, 2002“Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion”Cognitive Psychology44193–251.
32.
NicolsonR IFawcettA J, 1994“Comparison of deficits in cognitive and motor skills among children with dyslexia”Annals of Dyslexia44147–164.
33.
OrtonS T, 1928“Specific reading disability—strephosymbolia”Journal of the American Medical Association901095–1099.
34.
PashlerH, 1984“Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10358–377.
35.
PashlerH, 1989“Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two component theory of divided attention in simple tasks”Cognitive Psychology21469–514.
36.
PashlerH, 1994“Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory”Psychological Bulletin116220–244.
37.
PashlerHJohnstonJ, 1989“Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A4119–45.
38.
RackJ POlsonR K, 1993“Phonological deficits, IQ, and individual differences in reading disability: Genetic and environmental influences”Developmental Review13269–278.
39.
RentschlerIJüttnerM, 2007“Mirror-image relations in category learning”Visual Cognition15211–237.
40.
RusiakPLachmannTJaskowskiPvan LeeuwenC, 2007“Mental rotation of letters and shapes in developmental dyslexia”Perception36617–631.
41.
RüsselerJScholzJJordanKQuaiser-PohlC, 2005“Mental rotation of letters, pictures, and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children”Journal of Child Neuropsychology11497–512.
42.
RuthruffEMillerJ OLachmannT, 1995“Does mental rotation require central mechanisms?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21552–570.
43.
SchubertT, 1999“Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25408–425.
44.
Schulte-KörneG, 2001“Annotation: Genetics of reading and spelling disorder”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42985–997.
45.
SchwarzWIschebeckA, 2001“On the interpretation of RT vs. SOA functions: Application to dual task and precue-utilization paradigms”Journal of Mathematical Psychology45452–479.
46.
ShaywitzS EShaywitzB AFletcherJ MEscobarM D, 1990“Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls”Journal of the American Medical Association264998–1002.
47.
ShepardR NMetzlerJ, 1971“Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects”Science171701–703.
48.
SkottunB C, 2001“On the use of metacontrast to assess magnocellular function in dyslexic readers”Perception & Psychophysics631271–1274.
49.
SlaghuisW LRyanJ F, 1999“Spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity, coherent motion, and visible persistence in development dyslexia”Vision Research39651–668.
50.
SnowlingM, 2001“From language to reading and dyslexia”Dyslexia737–42.
51.
StanleyGHallA, 2005“Short-term visual information processing in dyslexics”Child Development44841–844.
52.
SteinJ, 2001“The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia”Dyslexia712–36.
53.
SteinJTalcottJWittonC, 2001“The sensorimotor basis of developmental dyslexia”, in Dyslexia: Theory and Good Practice Ed. FawcettA J, (London: Whurr) pp 65–88.
54.
SteinbrinkCKlatteM, 2008“Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities”Dyslexia14217–290.
55.
TelfordC W, 1931“The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses”Journal of Experimental Psychology141–36.
56.
TombuMJolicoeurP, 2002“All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts for the psychological refractory period phenomenon”Psychological Research66274–286.
57.
Van SelstMJolicoeurP, 1994“Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20905–921.
58.
VellutinoF RFletcherJ MSnowlingMScanlonD M, 2004“Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines452–40.
59.
WeigtR, 1980Zur Auswahl von Schülern für LRS-Klassen [Berlin (GDR): Verlag Volk und Wissen].
60.
WelfordA T, 1952“The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance—a review and a theory”British Journal of Psychology432–19.
61.
WillowsD MTerepockiM, 1993“The relation of reversal errors to reading disabilities”, in Visual Processes in Reading and Reading Disabilities Eds WillowsDKrukR SCorcosE, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 31–56.
