In the present study, we examined ascription of bizarreness to faces in a ratings task by children aged 8–10 and 11–13 years, and by adults. Configural information was manipulated subtly (a single eye was inverted) or in a more salient manner (eye and mouth were inverted). By utilizing brief presentations we restricted initial processing of the manipulations to one hemisphere. Right-hemispheric sensitivity to the manipulations was seen in higher ratings for (viewer-centered) left-sided manipulations than for right-sided manipulations. The youngest group showed significantly less right-hemisphere sensitivity to the manipulations in upright faces than the adults, but children aged 11–13 years were similar to adults. The three age groups were equivalently able to detect the stronger eye and mouth manipulation. In all, children's performance approached that of adults gradually in this task, which emphasizes immediate perceptual encoding of faces and for which memorial demands are minimal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BentonA L, 1980“The neuropsychology of face recognition”American Psychologist35176–186
2.
CampbellRTuckM, 1995“Children's recognition of inner and outer face-features of famous faces”Perception24451–456
3.
CampbellRWalkerJBaron-CohenS, 1995“The use of internal and external face features in the development of familiar face identification”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology59196–210
4.
CareySDiamondR, 1977“From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces”Science195312–314
5.
CareySDiamondR, 1994“Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?”Visual Cognition1253–274
6.
CareySDiamondRWoodsB, 1980“Development of face recognition: A maturational component?”Developmental Psychology16257–269
7.
DiamondRCareyS, 1977“Developmental changes in the representation of faces”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology231–22
8.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115(3) 107–117
9.
DonnellyNHadwinJ, 2003“Children's perception of the Thatcher illusion: Evidence for development in configural face processing”Visual Cognition101001–1017
10.
FreireALeeK, 2001“Face recognition in 4- and 7-year olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology80347–371
11.
FreireALeeKSymonsL A, 2000“The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence”Perception29159–170
12.
GilchristAMcKoneE, 2003“Early maturity of face processing in children: Local and relational distinctiveness effects in 7-yr-olds”Visual Cognition10769–793
13.
GolaraiGGhahremaniD GWhitfield-GabrieliSReissAEberhardtJ LGabrieliJGrill-SpectorK, 2007“Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory”Nature Neuroscience10512–522
14.
LevineS C, 1985“Developmental changes in right hemisphere involvement in face recognition”, in Developmental Neuropsychology and Education: Hemispheric Function and Collaboration Ed. BestC (New York: Academic Press) pp 157–191
15.
LevyJTrevarthenCSperryR W, 1972“Perception of bilateral chimeric images following hemispheric disconnexion”Brain9561–78
16.
LewisM B, 2003“Thatcher's children: Development and the Thatcher illusion”Perception321415–1421
17.
MaurerDO'CravenK MLe GrandRMondlochC JSpringerM VLewisT LGradyC L, 2007“Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing”Neuropsychologica451438–1451
18.
McFarlandKAndersonJ, 1980“Factor stability of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory as a function of test–retest performance, age and sex”British Journal of Psychology71135–142
19.
McKoneEBoyerB L, 2006“Sensitivity of 4-year-olds in featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology94134–162
20.
MondlochC JDobsonK SParsonsJMaurerD, 2004“Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: Factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology89159–181
21.
MondlochC JGeldartSMaurerDLe GrandR, 2003“Developmental changes in face processing skills”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology8667–84
22.
MondlochC JLe GrandRMaurerD, 2002“Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing”Perception31553–566
23.
MondlochC JMaurerDAholaS, 2006“Becoming a face expert”Psychological Science17930–934
24.
MondlochC JThomsonK, 2008, “Limitations in four-year-old children's sensitivity to the spacing among facial features”Child Development791513–1523
25.
MurrayJ EYongERhodesG, 2000“Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces”Psychological Science11492–496
26.
OldfieldR C, 1971“The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory”Neuropsychologia997–113
27.
PassarottiA MPaulB MBussiereJ RBuxtonR BWongE CStilesJ, 2003“The development of face and location processing: An fMRI study”Developmental Science6100–117
28.
PellicanoERhodesGPetersM, 2006“Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces?”Developmental Science9270–277
29.
ReynoldsD MJeevesM A, 1978“A developmental study of hemisphere specialization for recognition of faces in normal subjects”Cortex14511–520
30.
RhodesG, 1985“Lateralized processes in face recognition”British Journal of Psychology76249–271
31.
RhodesGBrakeSAtkinsonA P, 1993“What's lost in inverted faces?”Cognition4725–57
32.
RossionBDricotLZoontjesRVolderA-DBodartJ-MCrommelinckMde GelderBZoontjesR, 2000“Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience12793–802
33.
SearcyJ HBartlettJ C, 1996“Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22904–915
34.
SchwarzerG, 2000“Development of face processing: The effect of face inversion”Child Development71391–401
35.
TaylorM JEdmondsG EMcCarthyGAllisonT, 2001“Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children”NeuroReport121671–1676
36.
TaylorM JMcCarthyGSalibaEDegiovanniE, 1999“ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces”Clinical Neurophysiology110910–915
37.
ThompsonP, 1980“Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion”Perception9483–484
38.
WilliamsM ASavageGHalmagylM, 2006“Abnormal configural face perception in a patient with right anterior temporal lobe atrophy'”Neurocase12286–291
39.
YinR, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145
40.
YoungA WBionP J, 1980“Absence of any developmental trend in right hemisphere superiority for face recognition”Cortex16213–221
41.
YoungA WBionP J, 1983“The nature of the sex difference in right hemisphere superiority for face recognition”Cortex19215–226
42.
YoungA WEllisH D, 1976“Any experimental investigation of developmental differences in ability to recognise faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemisphere”Neuropsychologia14495–498
43.
YovelGLevyJGraboweckyMPallerK A, 2003“Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience15462–474
