We describe a compelling motion illusion elicited by a huge billboard placed along a street, depicting a building that contains strong perspective cues. When observers move fast along the opposite sidewalk, they perceive the depicted building as rotating in their direction of travel. This is a special case of the ‘following’, or ‘pointing out of the picture’, illusion that elicits a strong illusory motion percept. Here we discuss the cause of the illusory motion and suggest that the brain relies on the depicted perspective cues to infer a 3-D shape and a concomitant motion that is incompatible with the physical pictorial surface.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CookN DHayashiTAmemiyaTSuzukiTLeumannL, 2002“Effects of visual-field inversions on the reverse-perspective illusion”Perception311147–1151
2.
EnrightJ T, 1987“Art and the oculomotor system: Perspective illustrations evoke vergence changes”Perception16731–746
3.
GogelW C, 1990“A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications”Perception & Psychophysics48105–123
4.
GoldsteinE B, 1979“Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance578–87
5.
GoldsteinE B, 1988“Geometry or not geometry? Perceived orientation and spatial layout in pictures viewed at an angle”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14312–314
6.
GombrichE H, 1972“The ‘what and the how’: Perspective representation and the phenomenal world”, in Logic and Art: Essays in Honor of Nelson Goodman Eds RudnerRSchemerI (New York: Bobbs-Merrill) pp 129–149
7.
GregoryR L, 1975Eye and Brain (New York: McGraw-Hill)
8.
GregoryR L, 1980“Perceptions as hypotheses”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Section B290181–197
9.
GregoryR L, 1997“Knowledge in perception and illusion”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Section B3521121–1128
10.
HayashiTUmedaCCookN D, 2007“An fMRI study of the reverse-perspective illusion”Perception116372–78
11.
HillHJohnstonA, 2007“The hollow-face illusion: object-specific knowledge, general assumptions or properties of the stimulus?”Perception36199–223
12.
HochbergJ, 1971“Space and movement”, in Experimental Psychology Eds KingJ WRiggsL A (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston) pp 475–550
13.
HoffmannJSebaldA, 2007“Eye vergence is susceptible to the hollow-face illusion”Perception36461–470
14.
KaurMPapathomasT VDeCarloD, 2000“Schema- and data-driven influences in the hollow-face illusion: experiments and model”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science41224 [abstract]
15.
KoenderinkJ Jvan DoornA JKappersA M LToddJ T, 2004“Pointing out of the picture”Perception33513–530
16.
KubovyM, 1986The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
17.
PapathomasT V, 2007“Art pieces that ‘move’ in our minds—An explanation of illusory motion based on depth reversal”Spatial Vision2179–95
18.
PapathomasT VVidnyánszkyZZhuangX, 2004“From 2D to 3D and back: Perception of rotated 2D pictorial scenes depends on the 3D surfaces they depict”Vision Sciences Society Conference (Novato, CA: Vision Sciences Society Conference Proceedings) page 110 [abstract]
19.
PirenneM H, 1970Optics, Painting & Photography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
20.
RockI, 1983The Logic of Perception (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
21.
RogersB JGyaniA, 2010“Binocular disparities, motion parallax, and geometric perspective in Patrick Hughes's ‘reverspectives’: Theoretical analysis and empirical findings”Perception39330–348
22.
ShiffrarMFreydJ, 1993“Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs”Psychological Science4379–384
23.
ShimonoRTamW JStelmachLHildrethE, 2002“Stereoillusory motion concomitant with lateral head movements”Perception & Psychophysics641218–1226
24.
TodorovićD, 2008“Is pictorial perception robust? The effect of the observer vantage point on the perceived depth structure of linear-perspective images”Perception37106–125
TylerC W, 2005“A horopter for two-point perspective”Proceedings of SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging X5666306–315
27.
VishwanathDGirshickA RBanksM S, 2005“Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place”Nature Neuroscience81401–1410
28.
WadeN JCurthoysIMacDougallHCornellE, 2001“Fluctuations in perceived depth and convergence”Perception30Supplement, 28
29.
WadeN JHughesP, 1999“Fooling the eyes: trompe l'oeil and reverse perspective”Perception281115–1119
30.
WagnerMEhrensteinW HPapathomasT V, 2008“Vergence in reverspective: Percept-driven versus data-driven eye movement control”Neuroscience Letters449142–146
31.
WallachH, 1976“The apparent rotation of pictorial scenes”, in Vision and Artifact Ed. HenleM (New York: Springer) pp 65–69
32.
WallachH, 1985“Perceiving a stable environment”Scientific American252 (May) 118–124
33.
WallachH, 1987“Perceiving a stable environment when one moves”Annual Review of Psychology381–27
34.
WallachHStantonLBeckerD, 1974“The compensation for movement-produced changes in object orientation”Perception & Psychophysics15339–343
35.
WertheimA H, 1994“Motion perception during self motion”Behavioral and Brain Sciences17293–355
36.
WismeijerD Avan EeRErkelensC J, 2008“Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence”Experimental Brain Research18461–70
