In a series of four experiments, we explored whether pigeons complete partially occluded moving shapes. Four pigeons were trained to discriminate between a complete moving shape and an incomplete moving shape in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In testing, the birds were presented with a partially occluded moving shape. In experiment 1, none of the pigeons appeared to complete the testing stimulus; instead, they appeared to perceive the testing stimulus as incomplete fragments. However, in experiments 2, 3, and 4, three of the birds appeared to complete the partially occluded moving shapes. These rare positive results suggest that motion may facilitate amodal completion by pigeons, perhaps by enhancing the figure – ground segregation process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AustUHuberL, 2006“Does the use of natural stimuli facilitate amodal completion in pigeons?”Perception35333–349
2.
BakinJ SNakayamaKGilbertC D, 2000“Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configuration”Journal of Neuroscience208188–8198
3.
BowerT G R, 1967“Phenomenal identity and form perception in an infant”Perception & Psychophysics274–76
4.
CerellaJ, 1980“The pigeon's analysis of pictures”Pattern Recognition121–6
5.
CorballisP MFendrichRShapleyRGazzanigaM S, 1999“Illusory contours and amodal completion: Evidence for a functional dissociation in callosotomy patients”Cognitive Neuroscience11459–466
6.
DeruelleCBarbetIDepsyDFagotJ, 2000“Perception of partially occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio)”Perception291483–1497
7.
DiPietroN TWassermanE AYoungM E, 2002“Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition”Perception311299–1312
8.
EmmertonJ, 1983“Vision”, in Physiology and Behavior of the Pigeon Ed AbsM (New York: Academic Press) pp 245–266
9.
FagotJBarbetIParronCDeruelleC, 2006“Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues”Primates47145–150
10.
FujitaK, 2001“Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia)”Perception & Psychophysics63115–125
11.
FujitaKUshitaniT, 2005“Better living by not completing: A wonderful peculiarity of pigeon vision?”Behavioural Processes6959–66
12.
ForkmanB, 1998“Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture”Perception27861–867
13.
ForkmanBVallortigaraG, 1999“Minimization of modal contours: An essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth”Animal Cognition2181–185
14.
GibsonB MWassermanE AFreiLMillerK, 2004“Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: A versatile and affordable computerized touchscreen system”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers36355–362
15.
GierschAHumphreysG WBoucartMKovácsI, 2000“The computation of occluded contours in visual agnosia: Evidence for early computation prior to shape binding and figure – ground coding”Cognitive Neuropsychology17731–759
16.
GrossbergS, 2003“Filling-in the forms: Surface and boundary interactions in visual cortex”, in Filling-in: From Perceptual Completion to Cortical Reorganization Eds PessoaLDeWeerdP (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 13–37
17.
IkebuchiMOkanoyaK, 1999“Male zebra finches and Bengalese finches emit directed songs to the video images of conspecific females projected onto a TFT display”Zoological Science1663–70
18.
JohnsonS P, 2003“Development of fragmented versus holistic object perception”, in The Development of Face Processing Eds SchwarzerGLederH (Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber) pp 3–17
19.
JusczykP WJohnsonS PSpelkeE SKennedyL J, 1999“Synchronous change and perception of object unity: Evidence from adults and infants”Cognition71257–288
20.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger)
21.
KanizsaGRenziPConteSCompostelaCGueraniL, 1993“Amodal completion in mouse vision”Perception22713–721
22.
KellmanP J, 2003“Visual perception of objects and boundaries: A four-dimensional approach”, in Perceptual Organization in Vision: Behavioral and Neural Perspectives Eds KimchiRBehrmannMOlsonC R (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 155–201
23.
KellmanP JGuttmanSWickensT, 2001“Geometric and neural models of contour and surface interpolation in visual object perception”, in From Fragments to Objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision Eds ShipleyT FKellmanP J (New York: Elsevier Science) pp 183–245
24.
KellmanP JShipleyT F, 1991“A theory of visual interpolation in object perception”Cognitive Psychology23141–221
25.
KellmanP JSpelkeE S, 1983“Perception of partially occluded objects in infancy”Cognitive Psychology15483–524
26.
KellmanP JSpelkeE SShortK R, 1986“Infant perception of object unity from translatory motion in depth and vertical translation”Child Development5772–76
27.
LazarevaO FWassermanE ABiedermanI, 2007“Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience”Perception3633–48
28.
LeaS E GSlaterA MRyanC M E, 1996“Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant”Infant Behavior & Development19501–504
29.
LorenceauJShiffrarM, 1992“The role of terminators in motion integration across contours”Vision Research32263–273
30.
MichotteAThinèsGCrabbéG, 1964/1991“Amodal completion of perceptual structures”, in Michotte's Experimental Phenomenology of Perception Eds ThinèsGCostallAButterworthG (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991) pp 140–167
31.
MurrayS OKerstenDOlshausenB ASchraterPWoodsD L, 2002“Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA9915164–15169
32.
NagasakaYOsadaY, 2000“Subjective contours, amodal completion, and transparency in animals”Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology5063–73
33.
NakayamaKShimojoSSilvermanG H, 1989“Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and recognition of partially occluded objects”Perception1855–68
34.
OkanoyaKTakahashiM, 2000“Shikaku-teki hokan e no seitaigaku-teki apuroochi” [Ecological approach to visual completion] Kokoro no Hattatsu: Ninchi-teki Seicho no Kikoo 1999 (Reports of the Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research for Priority Areas) pp 34–41
35.
OsadaYSchillerP H, 1994“Can monkeys see objects under conditions of transparency and occlusion?”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science351664 (abstract)
36.
PalmerS E, 1999“Organizing objects and scenes”, in Vision Science—Photons to Phenomenology Ed PalmerS E (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 254–310
37.
QuinnP CBrownC RStreppaM L, 1997“Perceptual organization of complex visual configurations by young infants”Infant Behavior & Development2035–46
38.
RegolinLMarconatoFVallortigaraG, 2004“Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus)”Animal Cognition7162–170
39.
RegolinLVallortigaraG, 1995“Perception of partially occluded objects by young chicks”Perception & Psychophysics57971–976
40.
RensinkR AEnnsJ T, 1998“Early completion of occluded objects”Vision Research382489–2505
41.
SatoAKanazawaSFujitaK, 1997“Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes')”Japanese Psychological Research39191–199
42.
SchillerP H, 1995“Effect of lesions in visual cortical area V4 on the recognition of transformed objects”Nature376342–344
43.
SekulerA BLeeJ AShettleworthS J, 1996“Pigeons do not complete partially occluded figures”Perception251109–1120
44.
SekulerA BMurrayR F, 2001“Amodal completion: A case study in grouping”, in From Fragments to Objects—Segmentation and Grouping in Vision Eds ShipleyT FKellmanP J (New York: Elsevier Science) pp 265–293
45.
ShiffrarMLorenceauJ, 1996“Increased motion linking across edges with decreased luminance contrast, edge width and duration”Vision Research362061–2067
46.
ShimizuT, 1998“Conspecific recognition in pigeons (Columba livia) using dynamic video images”Behaviour13513–53
47.
SugitaY, 1999“Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex”Nature401269–272
48.
UshitaniTFujitaK, 2005“Pigeons do not perceptually complete partially occluded photos of food: An ecological approach to the ‘pigeon problem”’Behavioural Processes6967–78
WatanabeSFuruyaI, 1997“Video display for study of avian visual cognition: From psychophysics to sign language”International Journal of Comparative Psychology10111–127
51.
YamaguchiTKitamuraKItoM, 2003“The effect of visual displays for stimulus presentation on pigeons' discrimination of paintings”Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology5311–15
52.
YinCKellmanP JShipleyT F, 1997“Surface completion complements boundary interpolation in the visual integration of partly occluded objects”Perception261459–1479
