Five experiments were conducted to determine how novice and expert drawers represent relative size for the purposes of drawing. Participants were shown images of two-part or three-part geometric figures composed of two spatially separated shapes. In each picture there was a small but noticeable relative-size difference between the constituent shapes (one part of the picture was always 25% larger than another part). Participants later drew the pictures from memory. The results showed that novice and expert drawers consistently exaggerated the relative size relationship between the shapes in the picture when attempting to draw it from memory and when copying (the ‘caricature effect’), although the effect was reduced for the experts. The results are consistent with the idea that people represent size in memory using categorical descriptors (eg ‘smaller than’, ‘larger than’) rather than as precise metrics. Further, the results suggest that the process of becoming a skilled drawer may involve overcoming this categorical bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarberB, 2002Advanced Drawing Skills: A Course in Artistic Excellence (London: Acturus)
2.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147
3.
BrooksB ECooperE E, 2006“What types of visual recognition tasks are mediated by the neural subsystem that subserves face recognition?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition32684–698
4.
BruceVYoungA, 1998In the Eye of the Beholder (New York: Oxford University Press)
5.
CohenD JBennettS, 1997“Why can't most people draw what they see?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23609–621
6.
CooperE EBrooksB E, 2004“Qualitative differences in the representations of spatial relations for different object classes”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30243–256
7.
CooperE EWojanT J, 2000“Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic level object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26470–488
8.
CorenSEnnsJ T, 1993“Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers”Perception & Psychophysics54579–588
9.
CorenSMillerJ, 1974“Size contrast as a function of figural similarity”Perception & Psychophysics16355–357
10.
CoulmasF, 1989Writing Systems of the World (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell)
11.
DetersKCooperE E, 2000“Categorical biases when drawing objects from memory”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, Ames, IA
12.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117
13.
EdelmanSBülthoffH H, 1992“Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects”Vision Research322385–2400
EdwardsB, 1979Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain: A Course in Enhancing Creativity and Artistic Confidence (Los Angeles, CA: J P Tarcher)
16.
FarahM J, 1984“The neurological basis of mental imagery: A componential analysis”Cognition18245–272
17.
FeldmanJ, 2000“Bias toward regular form in mental shape spaces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26152–165
18.
GauthierINelsonC A, 2001“The development of face expertise”Current Opinion in Neurobiology11219–224
19.
GoguenJ A (Ed.), 1999a“Art and the brain”Journal of Consciousness Studies6 (special issue)
20.
GoguenJ A, 1999b“Editorial introduction”Journal of Consciousness Studies65–14
21.
GoldsteinE B, 2001“Pictorial perception and art”, in Blackwell Handbook of Perception Ed. GoldsteinE B (Malden, MA: Blackwell) pp 344–378
22.
GuérinFSkaBBellevilleS, 1999“Cognitive processing of drawing abilities”Brain and Cognition40464–478
23.
HelligeJMichimataC, 1989“Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information”Memory & Cognition17770–776
24.
HoffmanD D, 1998Visual Intelligence (New York: W W Norton)
25.
HummelJ EBiedermanI, 2002“Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition”, in Cognitive Modeling Ed. PolkT A (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 337–374
26.
HumphreyN, 1999“Cave art, autism, and the evolution of the human mind”Journal of Consciousness Studies6116–123
27.
IntraubHBodamerJ L, 1993“Boundary extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation of encoding artifact?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition191387–1397
28.
IntraubHRichardsonM, 1989“Wide-angle memories of close-up pictures”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition15179–187
29.
KosslynS M, 1994Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
30.
KosslynS MKoenigO, 1992Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience (New York: The Free Press)
31.
KosslynS MKoenigOBarrettACaveC BTangJGabrieliJ D E, 1989“Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specializations for categorical and coordinate relations”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15723–735
32.
KozbeltA, 2001“Artists as experts in visual cognition”Visual Cognition8705–723
33.
LeeM, 1989“When is an object not an object? The effects of ‘meaning’ upon the copying of line drawings”British Journal of Psychology8015–37
34.
McKoneEAitkinAEdwardsM, 2005“Categorical and coordinate relations in faces, or Fechner's Law and Face Space instead?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance311181–1198
35.
MarsolekC J, 1999“Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition”Psychological Science10111–118
36.
MassaroD WAndersonN H, 1971“Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion”Journal of Experimental Psychology89147–151
37.
MiallR CTchalenkoJ, 2001“A painter's eye movements: A study of eye and hand movement during portrait drawing”Leonardo3435–40
38.
RagnhildMLaengB, 2006“Drawing on either side of the brain”Laterality1171–89
39.
RhodesGCareySByattGProffittF, 1998“Coding spatial variations in faces and simple shapes: A test of two models”Vision Research382307–2332
40.
RoseDBressanP, 2002“Going round in circles: Shape effects in the Ebbinghaus illusion”Spatial Vision15191–203
41.
RosenblattEWinnerE, 1988“Is superior visual memory a component of superior drawing ability?”, in Exceptional Brain: Neuropsychology of Talent and Special Abilities Eds OblerL KFeinD (New York: Guilford Press) pp 341–363
42.
RosielleL JCooperE E, 2001“The categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition”Memory & Cognition2968–82
43.
RosielleL JCrabbB TCooperE E, 2002“Attentional coding of categorical relations in picture perception: Evidence from the flick paradigm”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9319–326
SolsoR L, 1994Cognition and the Visual Arts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
46.
TchalenkoJ, 2007“Eye movements in drawing simple lines”Perception361152–1167
47.
TchalenkoJ SDempere-MarcoLHuX PYangG Z, 2003“Eye movements and voluntary control in portrait drawing”, in The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research Eds RadachRHyonaJ (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 705–727
48.
Van SommersP, 1984Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes (New York: Cambridge University Press)
49.
Van SommersP, 1989“A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology”Cognitive Neuropsychology6117–164
50.
ViggianoM PVannucciM, 2002“Drawing and identifying objects in relation to semantic category and handedness”Neuropsychologia401482–1487
51.
ZekiS, 1999Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain (New York: Oxford University Press)
