Charles Wheatstone, in his classic paper on the invention of the stereoscope, concluded “… objects whose pictures do not fall on corresponding points of the two retinæ may still appear single” (1838 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128 384). Soon after, Ernst Brücke, Alexandre Prévost, David Brewster, Joseph Towne, and Joseph LeConte all published disagreements with this conclusion. LeConte's objections were most frequent and most prolonged. To understand the basis of the disagreements, we conducted three experiments using Wheatstone's original stereograms and found that most stereograms produced depth perception with diplopia, which partially explains the consistency among his critics' conclusions. Most of the criticism at variance with Wheatstone's conclusion was based on research conducted outside Germany. We argue that LeConte's lack of knowledge of the German literature on vision research prevented him from considering investigating Wheatstone's experiment with a stereogram having a smaller disparity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BraddickO J, 1979“Binocular single vision and perceptual processing”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B204503–512.
2.
BrewsterD., 1844“On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision, and on the representation of solid figures by union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina”Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh15349–368.
3.
BrückeE., 1841“Ueber die stereoskopischen Erscheinungen und Wheatstone's Angriff auf die Lehre von den identischen Stellen der Netzhäute”Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medizin8459–476.
4.
BurtP.JuleszB., 1980“Modifications of the classical notion of Panum's fusional area”Perception9671–682.
5.
ClaparèdeE., 1858“Quelques mots sur la vision binoculaire et stéréoscopique et sur la question de l'horoptre”Archives des Sciences—Physiques et Naturelles3138–168.
6.
DoveH., 1841“Über die Combination der Eindrücke beider Ohren und beider Augen zu einem Eindruck”Monatsberichte der Berliner preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften41251–252.
7.
EnrightJ T, 1991“Exploring the third dimension with eye movements: Better than stereopsis”Vision Research311549–1562.
8.
EnrightJ T, 1996“Sequential stereopsis: A simple demonstration”Vision Research36307–312.
9.
HelmholtzH., 1867“Handbuch der physiologischen Optik”, in Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Physikvolume 9, Ed. KarstenG. (Leipzig: Voss).
10.
HelmholtzH., 1925Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 translated by SouthallJ P C, (New York: Optical Society of America).
11.
HowardI P, 1970“Vergence, eye signature, and stereopsis”, in Human Space Perception Psychonomic Monograph Supplements 3 (whole No. 45), Ed. BairdJ C, (Austin, TX: Psychonomic Journal Inc.) pp 201–204.
12.
HowardI P, 2002Seeing in Depth: volume IBasic Mechanisms (Toronto: I Porteous).
13.
HowardI PRogersB J, 2002Seeing in Depth: volume IIDepth Perception (Toronto: I Porteous).
14.
LeConteJ., 1871a“On some phenomena of binocular vision. V. Stereoscopic phenomena”American Journal of Science and Arts11–10.
15.
LeConteJ., 1871b“On some phenomena of binocular vision; the mode of representing the position of double images”American Journal of Science and Arts1417–426.
16.
LeConteJ., 1878“On binocular vision”The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science527–29.
17.
LeConteJ., 1881Sight: An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular and Binocular Vision (New York: Appleton).
18.
LeConteJ., 1886“Double vision”Science7506.
19.
LeConteJ., 1895“Erect vision and single vision”Science2629–630.
20.
LeConteJ., 1897Sight: An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular and Binocular Vision2nd edition (New York: Appleton).
21.
LeConteJ., 1903The Autobiography of Joseph LeConte Ed. ArmesW D, (New York: Appleton).
22.
LeeH SDobbinsA C, 2006“Perceiving surfaces in depth beyond the fusion limit of their elements”Perception3531–39.
23.
MüllerJ., 1826Zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes des Menschen und der Thiere, nebst einen Versuch über die Bewegung der Augen und über den menschlichen Blick (Leipzig: Cnobloch).
24.
MüllerJ., 1840Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen für Vorlesungenvolume 2 (Coblenz: Hölscher).
25.
OgleK N, 1952“On the limits of stereoscopic vision”Journal of Experimental Psychology44253–259.
26.
OnoH.LillakasL.MappA P, 2003“The making of the direction sensing system for the Howard eggmobile”, in Levels of Perception Eds HarrisL.JenkinM. (New York: Springer) pp 127–147.
27.
OnoH.WadeN JLillakasL., 2002“The pursuit of Leonardo's constraint”Perception3183–102.
28.
PalmerD A, 1961“Measurement of the horizontal extent of Panum's area by a method of constant stimuli”Optica Acta8151–159.
29.
PanumP L, 1858Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen (Kiel: Schwerssche Buchhandlung).
30.
PrévostA P, 1843Essais sur la Théorie de la Vision Binoculaire (Geneva: Ramboz).
31.
PrévostP., 1804Essais de Philosophie ou Étude de l'Esprit Humain (Geneva: Paschoud).
32.
RichardW.FoleyJ M, 1971“Interhemispheric processing of binocular disparity”Journal of the Optical Society of America61419–421.
33.
SayeA.FrisbyJ P, 1975“The monocular conspicuous features in facilitating stereopsis from random-dot stereograms”Perception4159–171.
34.
SchorC MWoodI., 1983“Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency”Vision Research231649–1654.
35.
SchorC MWoodI.OgawaJ., 1984“Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution”Vision Research27661–665.
36.
StephensL D, 1982Joseph LeConte: Gentle Prophet of Evolution (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press).
37.
TanakaH.OhzawaI., 2006“Neural basis for stereopsis from second-order contrast cues”Journal of Neuroscience264370–4382.
38.
TowneJ., 1862“Remarks on the stereoscopic theory of vision, with observations on the experiments of Professor Wheatstone—Section 1”Guy's Hospital Reports870–80.
39.
TowneJ., 1869“Contributions to the physiology of binocular vision—Section VIII”Guy's Hospital Reports1454–83.
40.
TylerC W, 1973“Stereoscopic vision: Cortical limitations and a disparity scaling effect”Science181276–278.
41.
TylerC W, 1983“Sensory processing of binocular disparity”, in Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects Eds SchorM CCiuffredaK J, (Boston, MA: Butterworth) pp 199–296.
42.
ViethG U A, 1818“Ueber die Richtung der Augen”Annalen der Physik28233–253.
43.
WadeN J, 1983Brewster and Wheatstone on Vision (London: Academic Press).
WadeN JOnoH.MappA P, 2006“The lost direction in binocular vision: The neglected signs posted by Wells, Towne, and LeConte”Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences4261–86.
46.
WestheimerG.MitchellD E, 1969“The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movement”Vision Research9749–755.
47.
WheatstoneC., 1838“Contributions to the physiology of vision—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128371–394.
48.
WheatstoneC., 1852“Contributions to the physiology of vision—Part the second. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London1421–17.
49.
WilcoxL MHessR F, 1995“Dmax for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content”Vision Research351061–1069.
50.
WilcoxL MHessR F, 1997“Scale selection for second-order (non-linear) stereopsis”Vision Research372981–2992.
51.
ZieglerL RHessR F, 1997“Depth perception during diplopia is direct”Perception261225–1230.
