Can we search for items based on their type of motion? We consider here visual search based on three types of motion: (i) ballistic motion, in which objects move in a straight line until they encounter a display boundary; (ii) random-walk motion, in which objects change direction randomly; (iii) composite motion, in which objects move with random fluctuations around a generally ballistic trajectory. The asymmetric pattern of search efficiency can be explained by assuming that visual attention is guided by processes sensitive to the presence of linear motion and change in motion. The results do not reveal a more sophisticated ability to segregate items based on the nature of their motion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenG JKimR D, 2001“Perceptual information and attentional constraints in visual search of collision events”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance271039–1056.
2.
AnsorgeU.ScharlauI.LabuddaK., 2006“Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors”Psychological Research70103–116.
3.
AshidaH.SeiffertA EOsakaN., 2001“Inefficient visual search for second-order motion”Journal of the Optical Society of America A182255–2266.
4.
BergenJ RJuleszB., 1983“Rapid discrimination of visual patterns”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-13 857–863.
5.
BillockV ACunninghamD WHavigP RTsouB H, 2001“Perception of spatiotemporal random fractals: An extension of colorimetric methods to the study of dynamic texture”Journal of the Optical Society of America A182404–2413.
BuracasG TAlbrightT D, 1999“Covert visual search: A comparison of performance by humans and macaques (Macaca mulatta)”Behavioral Neuroscience113451–464.
8.
CarterE CCarterR C, 1981“Color and conspicuousness”Journal of the Optical Society of America71723–729.
9.
ChunM MWolfeJ M, 1996“Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?”Cognitive Psychology3039–78.
10.
CousineauD.ShiffrinR M, 2004“Termination of a visual search with large display size effects”Spatial Vision17327–352.
11.
DickM., 1989Parallel and Serial Processes in Motion DetectionUnpublished PhD thesis, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel.
12.
DickM.UllmanS.SagiD., 1987“Parallel and serial processes in motion detection”Science237400–402.
13.
DriverJ.McLeodP.DienesZ., 1992“Are direction and speed coded independently by the visual system? Evidence from visual search”Spatial Vision6133–147.
14.
DuncanJ.HumphreysG W, 1989“Visual search and stimulus similarity”Psychological Review96433–458.
FrithU., 1974“A curious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema”Perception & Psychophysics16113–116.
17.
GrzywaczN MWatamaniukS NMcKeeS P, 1995“Temporal coherence theory for the detection and measurement of visual motion”Vision Research353183–3203.
18.
HansenC HHansenR D, 1988“Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect”Journal of Personality & Social Psychology54917–924.
19.
HarrisJ MMcKeeS PWatamaniukS N, 1998“Visual search for motion-in-depth: Stereomotion does not “pop out’ from disparity noise”Nature Neuroscience1(2) 165–168.
20.
HershlerO.HochsteinS., 2005“At first sight: A high-level pop-out effect for faces”Vision Research451707–1724.
21.
HershlerO.HochsteinS., 2006““With a careful look: Still no low-level confound to face pop-out”Vision Research463028–3035.
22.
HorowitzT STreismanA., 1994“Attention and apparent motion”Spatial Vision8193–219.
23.
IvryR BCohenA., 1990“Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16317–331.
24.
IvryR BCohenA., 1992“Asymmetry in visual search for targets defined by differences in movement speed”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181045–1057.
25.
LippO VDerakshanN.WatersA MLogiesS., 2004““Snakes and cats in the flower bed: Fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals”Emotion4233–250.
26.
McLeodP.DriverJ.CrispJ., 1988“Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel”Nature332154–155.
27.
MacmillanN ACreelmanC D, 2004Detection Theory: A User's Guide2nd edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
28.
MalinowskiP.HubnerR., 2001““The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: Evidence for learned basic features”Perception & Psychophysics63458–463.
29.
MatsunoT.TomonagaM., 2006““Visual search for moving and stationary items in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens)”Behavioural Brain Research172219–232.
30.
MorvanC.WexlerM., 2005“Reference frames in early motion detection”Journal of Vision5131–138.
31.
von MühlenenALlerasA., 2003““Looming motion with random dot patterns attracts attention”, paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
32.
von MühlenenAMüllerH J, 1999“Visual search for motion—form conjunctions: Selective attention to movement direction”Journal of General Psychology126289–317.
33.
von MühlenenAMüllerH J, 2000““Perceptual integration of motion and form information: Evidence of parallel-continuous processing”Perception & Psychophysics62517–531.
34.
von MühlenenAMüllerH J, 2001“Visual search for motion—form conjunctions: Is form discriminated within the motion system?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27707–718.
35.
NagyA LSanchezR R, 1990“Critical color differences determined with a visual search task”Journal of the Optical Society of America A71209–1217.
36.
NakayamaK.SilvermanG H, 1986“Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions”Nature320264–265.
37.
NewellF NWallravenC.HuberS., 2004“The role of characteristic motion in object categorization”Journal of Vision4118–129.
38.
OhmanA.FlyktA.EstevesF., 2001“Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130466–478.
39.
PelliD G, 1997“The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies”Spatial Vision10437–442.
40.
PintoY.OliversC NTheeuwesJ., 2006“When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3259–72.
41.
PurcellD GStewartA LSkovR B, 1996“It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd”Perception251091–1108.
42.
RosenholtzR., 2001“Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries?”Perception & Psychophysics63476–489.
43.
RoydenC SWolfeJ MKlempenN L, 2001“Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields”Perception & Psychophysics63436–444.
44.
ShiraiN.YamaguchiM K, 2004“Asymmetry in the perception of motion-in-depth”Vision Research441003–1011.
45.
TakeuchiT., 1997“Visual search of expansion and contraction”Vision Research372083–2090.
46.
ThorntonT.GildenD L, 2001“Attentional limitations in the sensing of motion direction”Cognitive Psychology4323–52.
47.
TreismanA., 1985“Preattentive processing in vision”Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing31156–177.
48.
TreismanA.GeladeG., 1980“A feature-integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297–136.
49.
TreismanA.GormicanS., 1988“Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries”Psychological Review9515–48.
50.
TreismanA.SoutherJ., 1985“Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114285–310.
51.
VanRullenR., 2006“On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces”Vision Research463017–3027; author reply 3028–3035.
52.
ViswanathanL.MingollaE., 2002“Dynamics of attention in depth: Evidence from multi-element tracking”Perception311415–1437.
53.
WangQ.CavanaghP.GreenM., 1994“Familiarity and pop-out in visual search”Perception & Psychophysics56495–500.
54.
WatamaniukS N, 1992“Visible persistence is reduced by fixed-trajectory motion but not by random motion”Perception21791–802.
55.
WatsonD GHumphreysG W, 1999“Segmentation on the basis of linear and local rotational motion: Motion grouping in visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2570–82.
56.
WilliamsD WSekulerR., 1984“Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions”Vision Research2455–62.
57.
WolfeJ M, 1994“Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1202–238.
58.
WolfeJ M, 1998“Visual search”, in Attention Ed. PashlerH. (Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
59.
WolfeJ M, 2001“Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction”Perception & Psychophysics63381–389.
60.
WolfeJ MHorowitzT S, 2004“What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?”Nature Reviews Neuroscience5495–501.
