Every image of a scene produced in accord with the rules of linear perspective has an associated projection centre. Only if observed from that position does the image provide the stimulus which is equivalent to the one provided by the original scene. According to the perspective-transformation hypothesis, observing the image from other vantage points should result in specific transformations of the structure of the conveyed scene, whereas according to the vantage-point compensation hypothesis it should have little effect. Geometrical analyses illustrating the transformation theory are presented. An experiment is reported to confront the two theories. The results provide little support for the compensation theory and are generally in accord with the transformation theory, but also show systematic deviations from it, possibly due to cue conflict and asymmetry of visual angles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsK R, 1972“Perspective and the viewpoint”Leonardo5209–217.
2.
CuijpersR HKappersA M LKoenderinkJ J, 2000“Large systematic deviations in visual parallelism”Perception291467–1482.
3.
CuijpersR HKappersA M LKoenderinkJ J, 2002“Visual perception of collinearity”Perception & Psychophysics64392–404.
4.
CuttingJ E, 1987“Rigidity in cinema seen from front row, side aisle”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13323–334.
5.
CuttingJ E, 1988“Affine distortions of pictorial space: Some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that la Gournerie (1859) might have made”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14305–311.
6.
CuttingJ E, 1993“On the efficacy of cinema, or what the visual system did not evolve to do”, in Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments2nd edition, Ed. EllisS R, (London: Taylor & Francis) pp 486–495.
7.
DeręgowskiJ B, 1989“Geometric restitution of perspective: Bartel's method”Perception18595–600.
8.
DeręgowskiJ BParkerD M, 1988“On a changing perspective illusion within Vermeer's The Music Lesson”Perception1713–21.
9.
DeręgowskiJ BParkerD M, 1992“Three-space inference from two-space simulation”Perception & Psychophysics51397–403.
10.
DeręgowskiJ BParkerD M, 1995“Viewing angle and the perceived orientation of pictorial elements: Geometric or representational effects?”Perception241139–1153.
11.
DeręgowskiJ BShepherdJ WSlavenG A, 1997“Sex differences on Bartel's task: An investigation into perception of real and depicted distances”British Journal of Psychology88637–652.
12.
ten DoesschateG, 1964Perspective. Fundamentals, Controversials, History (Amsterdam: Nieuwkoop B de Graaf).
13.
DuberyF.WillatsJ., 1983Perspective and Other Drawing Systems (London: Herbert Press).
14.
EllisS RSmithS.McGreevyM W, 1987“Distortion of perceived visual direction out of pictures”Perception & Psychophysics42535–544.
15.
FarberJ.RosinskiR R, 1978“Geometric transformations of pictured space”Perception7269–282.
16.
FieldJ V, 1997The Invention of Infinity. Mathematics and Art in the Renaissance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
17.
GeattiL.FortunatiL., 1993“The Flagellation of Christ by Piero della Francesca: A study of its perspective”, in The Visual Mind: Art and Mathematics Ed. EmmerM. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 207–214.
18.
GoldsteinE B, 1979“Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: Evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance578–87.
19.
GoldsteinE B, 1987“Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13256–266.
20.
GoldsteinE B, 1988“Geometry or not geometry? Perceived orientation and spatial layout in pictures viewed at an angle”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14312–314.
21.
GoldsteinE B, 1993“Perceived orientation, spatial layout and the geometry of pictures”, in Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments2nd edition, Ed. EllisS R, (London: Taylor & Francis) pp 480–485.
22.
GoldsteinE B, 2001“Pictorial perception and art”, in Blackwell Handbook of Perception Ed. GoldsteinE B, (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 344–378.
23.
de la GournerieJ, 1859Traité de perspective lineaire (Paris: Dalmont et Dunod).
24.
GreenR., 1983“Determining the preferred viewpoint in linear perspective”Leonardo1697–102.
25.
HaberR N, 1980“Perceiving space from pictures: A theoretical analysis”, in What Then Are Pictures? The Psychology of Representational Art Ed. HagenM A, (New York: Academic Press) pp 3–31.
26.
HaberR N, 1983“Stimulus information and processing mechanisms in visual space perception”, in Human and Machine Vision Eds BeckJ.HopeB.RosenfeldA. (New York: Academic Press) pp 157–235.
27.
HagenM., 1974“Picture perception: Toward a theoretical model”Psychological Bulletin81471–497.
28.
HalloranT O, 1989“Picture perception is array-specific: Viewing angle versus apparent orientation”Perception & Psychophysics45467–482.
29.
HalloranT O, 1993“The frame turns also: Factors in differential rotation in pictures”Perception & Psychophysics54496–508.
30.
JerisonH J, 1967“Apparent motion of a vista: An illusion of perspective”American Journal of Psychology80448–453.
31.
JuricevicI.KennedyJ M, 2006“Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General135448–461.
32.
KubovyM., 1986The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
33.
LevinC AHaberR N, 1993“Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance”Perception & Psychophysics54250–259.
34.
de MeyM, 1995“Masaccio's bag of tricks”, in Understanding Images. Finding Meaning in Digital Imagery Ed. MarcheseF T, (Berlin: Springer) pp 143–170.
35.
PirenneM H, 1970Optics, Painting, Photography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
36.
RogersS., 1995“Perceiving pictorial space”, in Perception of Space and Motion. Handbook of Perception and Cognition2nd edition, Eds EpsteinW.RogersS. (New York: Academic Press) pp 119–163.
37.
RosinskiR RFarberJ., 1980“Compensation for viewing point in the perception of pictured space”, in The Perception of Picturesvolume 1: Alberti's Window: The Projective Model of Pictorial Information Ed. HagenM A, (New York: Academic Press) pp 137–176.
38.
RosinskiR RMulhollandT.DegelmanD.FarberJ., 1980“Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation”Perception & Psychophysics28521–526.
39.
SedgwickH A, 1980“The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation”, in The Perception of Picturesvolume 1: Alberti's Window: The Projective Model of Pictorial Information Ed. HagenM A, (New York: Academic Press) pp 34–90.
40.
SedgwickH A, 1986“Space perception”, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performancevolume 1, Eds BoffK RKaufmanL.ThomasJ P, (New York: John Wiley and Sons) pp 21–1–21–57.
41.
SedgwickH A, 1993“The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures”, in Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments Ed. EllisS R, (London: Taylor & Francis) pp 460–479.
42.
ShepardR N, 1992Mind Sights (New York: W H Freeman).
43.
SteckM., 1943Johann Heinrich Lambert. Schriften zur Perspektive (Berlin: Dr Georg Lüttke).
44.
TodorovićD., 2005“Geometric and perceptual effects of the location of the observer vantage point for linear-perspective images”Perception34521–544.
45.
TodorovićD., 2006“Geometric basis of perception of gaze direction”Vision Research463549–3562.
46.
ToyeR C, 1986“The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of scenes”Perception & Psychophysics4085–92.
47.
VishwanathD.GirshickA RBanksM S, 2005“Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place”Nature Neuroscience81401–1410.
48.
WagnerM., 1985“The metric of visual space”Perception & Psychophysics38483–495.
49.
WallachH., 1976“The apparent rotation of pictorial scenes”, in Vision and Artefact Ed. HenleM. (New York: Springer) pp 65–69.
50.
WittkowerR.CarterB A R, 1953“The perspective of Piero della Francesca's ‘Flagellation”’Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes16292–302.
51.
YangT.KubovyM., 1999“Weakening the robustness of perspective: Evidence for a modified theory of compensation in picture perception”Perception & Psychophysics61456–467.
