It has recently been demonstrated that people often fail to detect between-view changes in their visual environment. This phenomenon, called ‘change blindness’ (CB), occurs whenever the perceptual transient that usually accompanies a change is somehow blocked, or made less salient. In the well-known flicker paradigm, the transient is blocked by inserting a blank screen between the original and changed scenes. We tested whether transients that do not involve the appearance or disappearance of visual objects would also produce CB. Therefore we tested whether the appearance or disappearance of color information, and increments or decrements in luminance, could cause CB. In three experiments, subjects searched for changes in natural scenes. We found that both color transients and luminance transients significantly reduced change detection (by ∼30%) relative to a no-transient condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckM RLevinD T, 2003“The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and post-change objects”Perception & Psychophysics65458–468
2.
BlackmoreS JBrelstaffGNelsonKTrosciankoT, 1995“Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes”Perception241075–1081
3.
ColeG GKentridgeR WHeywoodC A, 2005“Object onset and parvocellular guidance of attentional allocation”Psychological Science16270–274
4.
Fernandez-DuqueDThorntonI, 2000“Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?”Visual Cognition7323–344
5.
Fernandez-DuqueDThorntonI, 2003“Explicit mechanisms do not account for implicit localization and identification of change: An empirical reply to Mitroff et al (2002)”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29846–858
6.
FolkC LRemingtonR WJohnstonJ C, 1992“Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181030–1044
7.
GellatlyAColeGBlurtonA, 1999“Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance251609–1624
8.
GrimesJ, 1996“On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades”, in Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. Volume 2: Perception Ed. AtkinsK (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 89–110
9.
HollingworthAHendersonJ M, 2000“Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes”Visual Cognition7213–235
10.
JonidesJYantisS, 1988“Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention”Perception & Psychophysics43346–354
11.
KempRPikeGWhitePMusselmanA, 1996“Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues”Perception2537–52
12.
LevinD TSimonsD J, 1997“Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review4501–506
13.
LivingstoneMHubelD, 1988“Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: Anatomy, physiology and perception”Science240740–749
14.
LuSZhouK, 2005“Stimulus driven attentional capture by equiluminant color change”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review12567–572
15.
McConkieG WZolaD, 1979“Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?”Perception & Psychophysics25221–224
16.
MondySColtheartV, 2000“Detection and identification of change in naturalistic scenes”Visual Cognition7281–296
17.
O'ReganJ KRensinkR AClarkJ J, 1999“Change blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’”Nature39834
18.
PosnerM ISnyderC R RDavidsonB J, 1980“Attention and the detection of signals”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General109160–174
RensinkR A, 2002“Change detection”Annual Review of Psychology53245–277
21.
RensinkR AO'ReganJ KClarkJ J, 1997“To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes”Psychological Science8368–373
22.
ShapleyR, 1995“Parallel neural pathways and visual function”, in The Cognitive Neurosciences Ed. GazzanigaM S (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 315–324
23.
SimonsD J, 2000“Attentional capture and inattentional blindness”Trends in Cognitive Sciences4147–155
24.
SimonsD JChabrisC F, 1999“Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events”Perception281059–1074
25.
SimonsD JFranconeriS LReimerR L, 2000“Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption”Perception291143–1154
26.
SimonsD JLevinD T, 1997“Change blindness”Trends in Cognitive Sciences1261–267
27.
SimonsD JLevinD T, 1998“Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review5644–649
28.
SimonsD JLevinD T, 2003“What makes change blindness interesting?”, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivationvolume 42, Eds IrwinD ERossB H (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) pp 295–322
29.
SnowdenR J, 2002“Visual attention to color: Parvocellular guidance of attentional resources?”Psychological Science13180–184
30.
TheeuwesJ, 1995“Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not”Perception & Psychophysics57637–644
31.
TurattoMBettellaSUmiltàCBridgemanB, 2003“Perceptual conditions necessary to induce change blindness”Visual Cognition10233–255
32.
WatanabeK, 2003“Differential effect of distractor timing on localizing versus identifying changes”Cognition88243–257
33.
WayandJ WLevinD TVarakinD A, 2005“Inattentional blindness for a noxious multimodal stimulus”American Journal of Psychology118339–352
