This demonstration uses one of the most famous human faces, the portrait of Mona Lisa, La Gioconda, by Leonardo da Vinci. Usually, we have a very accurate and stable representation of the exact configuration of such a familiar face. Typically, we are able to rapidly recognise even subtle configural changes. However, here we show that an exposure to specific alterations performed on a familiar face substantially reduces this ability even over a time period as long as 80 min. This demonstration illustrates the flexibility of the perceptual system and adaptation to new information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BahrickH PBahrickP OWittlingerR P, 1975“Fifty years of memory for names and faces: a cross-sectional approach”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General10454–75
2.
BruceV, 1994“Stability from variation: the case of face recognition. The M.D. Vernon memorial lecture”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology A475–28
CarbonC CLederH, 2005a“Face adaptation: Changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes?”Advances in Experimental Psychology11–7
5.
CarbonC CLederH, 2005b“When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces”Perception341117–1134
6.
CareyS, 1992“Becoming a face expert”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London33595–103
7.
CliffordC W GRhodesG, 2005Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High Level Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
8.
FaulknerT FRhodesGPalermoRPellicanoEFergusonD, 2002“Recognizing the un-real McCoy: priming and the modularity of face recognition”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review9327–334
9.
HaigN D, 1984“The effect of feature displacement on face recognition”Perception13505–512
10.
HosieJ AEllisH DHaigN D, 1988“The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces”Perception17461–474
11.
LederHBruceV, 2000“When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology A53513–536
12.
LederHCarbonC C, 2004“Part-to-whole effects and configural processing in faces”Psychology and Science46531–543
13.
LederHCarbonC C, 2006“Face-specific configural processing of relational information”British Journal of Psychology9719–29
MoradiFKochCShimojoS, 2005“Face adaptation depends on seeing the face”Neuron45169–175
16.
RhodesGJefferyLWatsonT LCliffordC W GNakayamaK, 2003“Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects”Psychological Science14558–566
17.
TarrM JGauthierI, 2000“FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise”Nature Neuroscience3764–769
18.
WebsterM AMacLinO H, 1999“Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review6647–653
19.
YamamotoSKashikuraK, 1999“Speed of face recognition in humans: an event-related potentials study”NeuroReport103531–3534
